Razak Abdul, Lei Donna, McDonald Courtney A, Hunt Rod W, Miller Suzanne L, Malhotra Atul
Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Monash Newborn, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2023 Oct 5;12(10):651-664. doi: 10.1093/stcltm/szad048.
Neonatal cell therapy applications are increasing; however, data on allogeneic cell therapy are limited.
To summarize evidence on allogeneic cell therapy in term and preterm neonates.
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Ovid Medline, and various registries were searched for studies investigating the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of allogeneic cell therapy in neonates. Two authors independently selected the articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias.
Twelve published (153 infants) and 21 ongoing studies were included. These studies predominantly sourced allogeneic cells from umbilical cord blood (UCB). Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) were the main cell type used (134 of 153 infants); others included UCB-derived total nucleated cells (TNCs) and human amnion epithelial cells (hAECs). Applications included bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD; 113 infants), Krabbe disease (13 infants), intraventricular haemorrhage (10 infants), perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (10 infants), hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (6 infants), and necrotizing enterocolitis (1 infant). Nine out of 12 studies did not report any serious adverse events (SAEs) related to cell administration. Three studies reported SAEs, such as graft versus host disease (GVHD) in 5 infants (UCB-derived TNCs for Krabbe disease); and transient cardiorespiratory compromise in 1 infant (hAECs for BPD). Data on efficacy outcomes were limited.
The safety and feasibility of allogeneic cell therapy applications in neonates are available, mainly from the use of MSCs. Further safety data for other cell types are required, and the risk of GVHD in different settings needs to be determined. Efficacy studies are largely lacking for all cell types.
The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42023397876), the international prospective register for systematic reviews (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO).
新生儿细胞治疗的应用正在增加;然而,关于同种异体细胞治疗的数据有限。
总结足月儿和早产儿同种异体细胞治疗的证据。
检索Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、Embase、Ovid Medline以及各种注册库,以查找研究同种异体细胞治疗在新生儿中的安全性、可行性和有效性的研究。两位作者独立选择文章、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。
纳入了12项已发表的研究(153名婴儿)和21项正在进行的研究。这些研究主要从脐带血(UCB)中获取同种异体细胞。间充质基质细胞(MSC)是主要使用的细胞类型(153名婴儿中的134名);其他包括UCB来源的全有核细胞(TNC)和人羊膜上皮细胞(hAEC)。应用包括支气管肺发育不良(BPD;113名婴儿)、克拉伯病(13名婴儿)、脑室内出血(10名婴儿)、围产期动脉缺血性中风(10名婴儿)、缺氧缺血性脑病(6名婴儿)和坏死性小肠结肠炎(1名婴儿)。12项研究中有9项未报告与细胞给药相关的任何严重不良事件(SAE)。三项研究报告了SAE,例如5名婴儿发生移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)(用于克拉伯病的UCB来源的TNC);1名婴儿发生短暂的心肺功能不全(用于BPD的hAEC)。疗效结果的数据有限。
新生儿同种异体细胞治疗应用的安全性和可行性是有数据的,主要来自MSC的使用。需要其他细胞类型的进一步安全性数据,并且需要确定不同情况下GVHD的风险。所有细胞类型的疗效研究大多缺乏。
该方案已在国际系统评价前瞻性注册库PROSPERO(注册号CRD42023397876)(https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO)注册。