School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, 7000 Fannin Street, Suite 600, Houston, TX, USA.
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02601-2.
The demographic profile of practicing physicians is changing as more female medical students are graduating and practicing in the field. While the education received may not differ by gender, studies have shown that physician practice outcomes vary by provider gender. Various factors could contribute to these differences, including culture and explicit biases which may lead to implicit bias. This study aims to identify the available evidence of gender-based implicit bias throughout the delivery process of medicine.
This scoping review evaluated published literature within the PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and BioMed Central databases pertaining to physician's gender as a factor in the delivery of medicine. Arksey and O'Malley's six-stage methodology was used as a framework and reported using the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Searches occurred between May 2020 and June 2020, and the timeframe was not limited. Included articles had gender as a factor in the delivery of medicine and implicit bias. Articles were excluded if they did not include the gender of the physician. After screening by reviewers and a medical librarian, study characteristics were charted and analyzed.
The initial search resulted in 2420 records. After screening, 162 of the records were selected based on title and keyword relevance. After additional screening, 15 records were ultimately included in the review based on full-text evaluation. Records were organized into sub-topics post hoc focused on clinical qualities, diagnostics, treatment, and outcomes.
This scoping review found that gender-based implicit bias may be inadvertently acquired from culture and education. Although implicit bias is highly researched, much of the current literature focuses on the gender of the patient. This study found important gaps in the available literature regarding race and gender of the physician. Further studies could explore outcome differences between recent graduates and career physicians, for both female and male physicians.
随着越来越多的女医学生毕业并在该领域执业,执业医师的人口统计学特征正在发生变化。虽然接受的教育可能因性别而异,但研究表明,医生的实践结果因提供者的性别而异。各种因素可能导致这些差异,包括文化和明确的偏见,这可能导致隐含的偏见。本研究旨在确定在整个医学提供过程中存在的基于性别的隐性偏见的现有证据。
本范围综述评估了发表在 PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE、PsychINFO、Web of Science 和 BioMed Central 数据库中的文献,这些文献涉及医生的性别作为提供医学服务的一个因素。阿斯基和奥马利的六阶段方法被用作框架,并使用更新的系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)进行报告。搜索于 2020 年 5 月至 2020 年 6 月之间进行,并且没有时间限制。纳入的文章以性别为因素,提供了药物治疗的方法。如果文章不包括医生的性别,则将其排除在外。在经过审查员和医学图书馆员筛选后,对研究特征进行了图表和分析。
最初的搜索产生了 2420 条记录。经过筛选,根据标题和关键词相关性选择了 162 条记录。经过进一步筛选,根据全文评估最终有 15 篇文献纳入综述。记录按主题组织,重点是临床质量、诊断、治疗和结果。
本范围综述发现,基于性别的隐性偏见可能是无意中从文化和教育中获得的。虽然隐性偏见受到了广泛的研究,但目前的大部分文献都集中在患者的性别上。本研究发现,关于医生的种族和性别,现有文献存在重要差距。进一步的研究可以探索男女医生之间近期毕业生和职业医生之间的结果差异。