Department of Surgery, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 1;118(10):1829-1840. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002478. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
Screening decreases colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, but uptake in the United States remains suboptimal. Prior studies have investigated the effect of various interventions on overall colorectal cancer screening and stool-based testing, but the effect on colonoscopy-the predominant screening test in the United States-has not been fully examined. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of behavioral interventions on screening colonoscopy uptake.
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases through January 2022 for controlled trials that assessed the effect of behavioral interventions on screening colonoscopy uptake. All titles, abstracts, and articles were screened by at least 2 independent reviewers. Odds ratios were extracted from the original article or calculated from the raw data. The primary outcome was the relative increase in screening colonoscopy completion with any behavioral intervention. We performed random-effects meta-analysis, with subgroup analysis by type of intervention.
A total of 25 studies with 30 behavioral interventions were analyzed. The most common interventions were patient navigation (n = 11) and multicomponent interventions (n = 6). Overall, behavioral interventions increased colonoscopy completion by 54% compared with controls (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-1.88). Patient navigation (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.35-2.34) and multicomponent interventions (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.17-2.89) had the strongest effect on colonoscopy completion among interventions examined in multiple studies. Significant heterogeneity was observed both overall and by intervention type. There was no evidence of publication bias.
Behavioral interventions increase screening colonoscopy completion and should be adopted in clinical practice. In particular, patient navigation and multicomponent interventions are the best-studied and most effective interventions.
筛查可降低结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率,但美国的筛查率仍不理想。先前的研究已经调查了各种干预措施对总体结直肠癌筛查和基于粪便的检测的影响,但尚未全面研究其对结肠镜检查的影响——这是美国主要的筛查检测方法。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估行为干预措施对筛查结肠镜检查参与度的影响。
我们通过至少 2 位独立审查员对 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库进行了截至 2022 年 1 月的对照试验搜索,以评估行为干预措施对筛查结肠镜检查参与度的影响。所有标题、摘要和文章均由至少 2 位独立审查员筛选。从原始文章中提取比值比或从原始数据中计算。主要结局是任何行为干预措施对筛查结肠镜检查完成率的相对增加。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析,并按干预类型进行了亚组分析。
共分析了 25 项研究中的 30 项行为干预措施。最常见的干预措施是患者导航(n=11)和多组分干预(n=6)。总体而言,与对照组相比,行为干预可使结肠镜检查完成率增加 54%(比值比[OR]1.54,95%置信区间[CI]1.26-1.88)。在多项研究中检查的干预措施中,患者导航(OR 1.78,95%CI 1.35-2.34)和多组分干预(OR 1.84,95%CI 1.17-2.89)对结肠镜检查完成率的影响最强。总体和按干预类型观察到显著的异质性。没有发现发表偏倚的证据。
行为干预措施可提高筛查结肠镜检查的完成率,应在临床实践中采用。特别是患者导航和多组分干预是研究最多且最有效的干预措施。