Suppr超能文献

吉布森-库克法与宏导管法在囊性纤维化新生儿筛查项目及诊断不明确的囊性纤维化筛查阳性受试者中的比较。

Comparison between Gibson-Cooke and Macroduct Methods in the Cystic Fibrosis Neonatal Screening Program and in Subjects Who Are Cystic Fibrosis Screen-Positive with an Inconclusive Diagnosis.

作者信息

Dolce Daniela, Fevola Cristina, Camera Erica, Orioli Tommaso, Lucenteforte Ersilia, Malanima Marco Andrea, Taccetti Giovanni, Terlizzi Vito

机构信息

Cystic Fibrosis Regional Reference Center, Department of Paediatric Medicine, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Viale Gaetano Pieraccini 24, 50139 Florence, Italy.

Unit of Medical Statistics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Neonatal Screen. 2023 Jul 25;9(3):41. doi: 10.3390/ijns9030041.

Abstract

The sweat test (ST) is the current diagnostic gold standard for cystic fibrosis (CF). Many CF centres have switched from the Gibson-Cooke method to the Macroduct system-based method. We used these methods simultaneously to compare CF screening outcomes. STs using both methods were performed simultaneously between March and December 2022 at CF Centre in Florence. We included newborns who underwent newborn bloodspot screening (NBS), newborns undergoing transfusion immediately after birth, and children with CF screen-positive, inconclusive diagnosis (CFSPID). We assessed 72 subjects (median age 4.4 months; range 0-76.7): 30 (41.7%) NBS-positive, 18 (25.0%) newborns who underwent transfusion, and 24 (33.3%) children with CFSPID. No significant differences were found between valid sample numbers, by patient ages and groups ( = 0.10) and between chloride concentrations ( = 0.13), except for sweat chloride (SC) measured by the Gibson-Cooke and Macroduct methods in CFSPID group (29.0, IQR: 20.0-48.0 and 22.5, IQR: 15.5-30.8, respectively; = 0.01). The Macroduct and Gibson-Cooke methods showed substantial agreement with the SC values, except for CFSPID, whose result may depend on the method of sweat collection. In case of invalid values with Macroduct, the test should be repeated with Gibson-Cooke method.

摘要

汗液试验(ST)是目前囊性纤维化(CF)的诊断金标准。许多CF中心已从吉布森 - 库克方法转向基于Macroduct系统的方法。我们同时使用这些方法来比较CF筛查结果。2022年3月至12月期间,在佛罗伦萨的CF中心同时采用这两种方法进行了汗液试验。我们纳入了接受新生儿血斑筛查(NBS)的新生儿、出生后立即接受输血的新生儿以及CF筛查阳性但诊断不确定(CFSPID)的儿童。我们评估了72名受试者(中位年龄4.4个月;范围0 - 76.7岁):30名(41.7%)NBS阳性,18名(25.0%)接受输血的新生儿,以及24名(33.3%)CFSPID儿童。在有效样本数量方面,按患者年龄和组分类( = 0.10)以及在氯化物浓度方面( = 0.13)均未发现显著差异,但CFSPID组中通过吉布森 - 库克方法和Macroduct方法测得的汗液氯化物(SC)除外(分别为29.0,IQR:20.0 - 48.0和22.5,IQR:15.5 - 30.8; = 0.01)。Macroduct方法和吉布森 - 库克方法显示出与SC值有实质性一致性,但CFSPID除外,其结果可能取决于汗液采集方法。如果Macroduct方法得出无效值,则应使用吉布森 - 库克方法重复测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b54/10443242/0358da177156/IJNS-09-00041-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验