McGarr Gregory W, Meade Robert D, Kenny Glen P
Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Physiol Behav. 2023 Nov 1;271:114335. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2023.114335. Epub 2023 Aug 20.
Public health agencies recommend that older adults without home air-conditioning visit cooling centres to mitigate physiological strain from high ambient temperatures during heat waves. However, there is little evidence regarding their influence on self-reported environmental symptoms and mood-state after returning to the heat.
Forty adults (64-79 years) underwent a daylong laboratory-based indoor overheating simulation (9-hours, heat index: 37 °C) with (cooling, n = 20) or without (control, n = 20) a 2-hour air-conditioning intervention (hours 5-6). Mean skin and core temperature areas under the curve (AUC, hours 0-9) were used to assess cumulative thermal strain. Group differences in total symptom scores and subjective heat illness (68-item environmental symptoms questionnaire) as well as total mood disturbance and energy index (40-item profile of mood states questionnaire) were evaluated at end-heating (adjusted for pre-exposure scores).
Cooling reduced mean skin and core temperature AUCs by 4.0 [0.1, 0.8] and 1.6 [0.4, 2.8] °C·hour compared to control (both p < 0.048). However, at end-heating neither mean skin nor core temperatures differed between groups (both p > 0.999). Total symptom scores and subjective heat illness were 0.58-fold [0.44, 0.77] and 0.56-fold [0.40, 0.78] lower in the cooling compared to control group (both p < 0.001). Mood disturbance was 0.91-fold [0.83, 0.99] lower for cooling than control (p = 0.036), although energy index was not different between groups (p = 0.141).
Cooling centres can have sustained positive effects on perceived thermal strain and mood-state in older adults after returning to the heat. However, continued vigilance and use of appropriate countermeasures to mitigate physiological strain from indoor overheating should be encouraged as body temperatures can rapidly return to pre-cooling levels.
公共卫生机构建议,家中没有空调的老年人前往降温中心,以减轻热浪期间高环境温度带来的生理压力。然而,关于其对回到炎热环境后自我报告的环境症状和情绪状态的影响,证据很少。
40名成年人(64 - 79岁)在实验室进行了为期一天的室内过热模拟(9小时,热指数:37°C),其中20人接受(降温组)或20人不接受(对照组)2小时的空调干预(第5 - 6小时)。用平均皮肤温度和核心温度曲线下面积(AUC,0 - 9小时)评估累积热应激。在加热结束时(根据暴露前分数进行调整),评估两组在总症状评分和主观热疾病(68项环境症状问卷)以及总情绪障碍和能量指数(40项情绪状态剖面图问卷)方面的差异。
与对照组相比,降温使平均皮肤温度和核心温度AUC分别降低4.0 [0.1, 0.8]和1.6 [0.4, 2.8]°C·小时(均p < 0.048)。然而,在加热结束时,两组的平均皮肤温度和核心温度均无差异(均p > 0.999)。与对照组相比,降温组的总症状评分和主观热疾病分别低0.58倍[0.44, 0.77]和0.56倍[0.40, 0.78](均p < 0.001)。降温组的情绪障碍比对照组低0.91倍[0.83, 0.99](p = 0.036),尽管两组的能量指数无差异(p = 0.141)。
降温中心对老年人回到炎热环境后的热应激感知和情绪状态可产生持续的积极影响。然而,由于体温可迅速恢复到降温前水平,应鼓励持续保持警惕并采取适当对策来减轻室内过热带来的生理压力。