• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症患者30天生存的院前预后因素;一项回顾性队列研究。

Pre-hospital Prognostic Factors of 30-Day Survival in Sepsis Patients; a Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Huabbangyang Thongpitak, Klaiangthong Rossakorn, Jaibergban Fahsai, Wanphen Chanathip, Faikhao Thanakorn, Banjongkit Passakorn, Kuchapan Ratchaporn

机构信息

Department of Disaster and Emergency Medical Operation, Faculty of Science and Health Technology, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Jul 13;11(1):e48. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.2029. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.22037/aaem.v11i1.2029
PMID:37609537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10440748/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

According to excising findings, if the emergency management system (EMS) operation will be developed, the survival outcome of sepsis patients might improve. This study aimed to evaluate the pre-hospital associated factors of survival in sepsis patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients diagnosed with sepsis, coded with the Thailand emergency medical triage protocol and criteria-based dispatch symptom group 17. Information on the 30-day survival rate of patients was obtained from the electronic medical records. Pre-hospital factors associated with 30-day survival were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and were reported using odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

300 patients diagnosed with sepsis were enrolled. Among them, 232 (77.3%) survived within 30 days. Non-survived cases had significantly older age (p = 0.019), lower oxygen saturations (92.5% vs. 95.0%; p = 0.003), higher heart rate (p = 0.001), higher respiratory rate (p < 0.001), lower level of consciousness (p < 0.001), higher disease severity based on qSOFA score (p = 0.001), and higher need for invasive airway management (p = 0.001) and supplementary oxygen (p = 0.001). The survival rate improved by 3.5% with every 1% increase in pre-hospital oxygen saturation (adjusted OR = 1.035, 95% CI: 1.005-1.066, p = 0.020) and the survival probabilities of patients who responded to voice (adjusted OR = 0.170, 95% CI: 0.050-0.579, p = 0.005), those who responded to pain (adjusted OR = 0.130, 95% CI: 0.036-0.475, p = 0.002), and those who were unresponsive (adjusted OR = 0.086, 95% CI: 0.026-0.278, p-value < 0.001) were lower than patients who were alert.

CONCLUSION

The 30-day survival rate of patients with sepsis managed by the EMS team was 77.3%. Pre-hospital oxygen saturation and level of consciousness were associated with the survival of patients with sepsis who were managed in the pre-hospital setting.

摘要

引言

根据切除结果,如果能改进应急管理系统(EMS)的运作,脓毒症患者的生存结局可能会得到改善。本研究旨在评估脓毒症患者院前与生存相关的因素。

方法

本回顾性队列研究针对诊断为脓毒症的患者进行,这些患者按照泰国急诊医疗分诊协议和基于标准的调度症状组17进行编码。患者30天生存率的信息从电子病历中获取。使用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析来分析与30天生存相关的院前因素,并以比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)进行报告。

结果

共纳入300例诊断为脓毒症的患者。其中,232例(77.3%)在30天内存活。未存活病例的年龄显著更大(p = 0.019),氧饱和度更低(92.5%对95.0%;p = 0.003),心率更高(p = 0.001),呼吸频率更高(p < 0.001),意识水平更低(p < 0.001),基于快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分的疾病严重程度更高(p = 0.001),以及对有创气道管理(p = 0.001)和补充氧气(p = 0.001)的需求更高。院前氧饱和度每增加1%,生存率提高3.5%(调整后的OR = 1.035,95% CI:1.005 - 1.066,p = 0.020),对声音有反应(调整后的OR = 0.170, 95% CI: 0.050 - 0.579, p = 0.005)、对疼痛有反应(调整后的OR = 0.130, 95% CI: 0.036 - 0.475, p = 0.002)和无反应(调整后的OR = 0.086, 95% CI: 0.026 - 0.278, p值< 0.001)的患者的生存概率低于清醒患者。

结论

由EMS团队管理的脓毒症患者的30天生存率为77.3%。院前氧饱和度和意识水平与院前环境中管理脓毒症患者的生存相关。

相似文献

1
Pre-hospital Prognostic Factors of 30-Day Survival in Sepsis Patients; a Retrospective Cohort Study.脓毒症患者30天生存的院前预后因素;一项回顾性队列研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Jul 13;11(1):e48. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.2029. eCollection 2023.
2
Survival Rates and Factors Related to the Survival of Traffic Accident Patients Transported by Emergency Medical Services.交通事故患者由紧急医疗服务运送后的生存率及相关生存因素
Open Access Emerg Med. 2021 Dec 18;13:575-586. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S344705. eCollection 2021.
3
Prevalence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Emergency Department Discharge Among Patients With Sepsis.脓毒症患者急诊出院的患病率、特征和结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2147882. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47882.
4
Risk factors of sepsis among patients with qSOFA<2 in the emergency department.急诊 qSOFA<2 的患者发生脓毒症的危险因素。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:699-706. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.035. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
5
[A multicenter confirmatory study about precision and practicability of Sepsis-3].关于脓毒症-3(Sepsis-3)精准度与实用性的多中心验证性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;29(2):99-105. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.02.002.
6
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.
7
[The features and treatment of Xixia "May 17th" explosion accident].[西夏“5·17”爆炸事故的特点与处理]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Dec;30(12):1196-1199. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.012.018.
8
[Clinical investigation on the risk factors for prognosis in patients with septic shock].[脓毒性休克患者预后危险因素的临床研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Sep;31(9):1078-1082. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.09.004.
9
qSOFA is a useful prognostic factor for 30-day mortality in infected patients fulfilling the SIRS criteria for sepsis.qSOFA 是感染患者中符合脓毒症 SIRS 标准的 30 天死亡率的有用预后因素。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Mar;38(3):512-516. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.05.037. Epub 2019 May 21.
10
Predictors of Mortality in Elderly and Very Elderly Emergency Patients with Sepsis: A Retrospective Study.老年和超高龄脓毒症急诊患者死亡率的预测因素:一项回顾性研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 6;21(6):210-218. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.7.47405.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing bloodstream infection diagnostics: a novel filtration and targeted next-generation sequencing approach for precise pathogen identification.增强血流感染诊断:一种用于精确病原体鉴定的新型过滤和靶向新一代测序方法。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Mar 20;16:1538265. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1538265. eCollection 2025.
2
A Look at Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Journal in 2023.2023年《学术急诊医学杂志档案》概览
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 10;12(1):e21. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2250. eCollection 2024.
3
An early warning model for predicting major adverse kidney events within 30 days in sepsis patients.一种用于预测脓毒症患者30天内主要不良肾脏事件的早期预警模型。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 26;10:1327036. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1327036. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Reduced oxygen saturation entropy is associated with poor prognosis in critically ill patients with sepsis.氧饱和度嫡降低与脓毒症危重症患者预后不良相关。
Physiol Rep. 2022 Dec;10(24):e15546. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15546.
2
Predictive Factors of Outcome in Cases of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Traffic Accident Injuries in Thailand; a National Database Study.泰国交通事故伤所致院外心脏骤停病例结局的预测因素;一项全国性数据库研究
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 16;10(1):e64. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1700. eCollection 2022.
3
Is Prehospital Assessment of qSOFA Parameters Associated with Earlier Targeted Sepsis Therapy? A Retrospective Cohort Study.院前qSOFA参数评估与早期脓毒症靶向治疗相关吗?一项回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 17;11(12):3501. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123501.
4
Perception and Satisfaction of Patients' Relatives Regarding Emergency Medical Service Response Times: A Cross-Sectional Study.患者亲属对紧急医疗服务响应时间的认知与满意度:一项横断面研究。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2022 Apr 13;14:155-163. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S360114. eCollection 2022.
5
Early prediction of survival at different time intervals in sepsis patients: A visualized prediction model with nomogram and observation study.脓毒症患者不同时间间隔生存率的早期预测:一种基于列线图和观察性研究的可视化预测模型
Tzu Chi Med J. 2021 May 11;34(1):55-61. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_3_21. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
6
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
7
Sepsis and septic shock in emergency departments of Mexico: a multicenter point prevalence study.墨西哥急诊科的脓毒症和脓毒性休克:一项多中心时点患病率研究。
Gac Med Mex. 2020;156(6):486-492. doi: 10.24875/GMM.M21000492.
8
Severe sepsis and septic shock in patients transported by prehospital services versus walk in patients to the emergency department.院前服务转运与自行来诊患者的严重脓毒症和感染性休克患者到急诊科的比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;45:173-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.08.021. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
9
Epidemiology and patient predictors of infection and sepsis in the prehospital setting.院前环境中感染和脓毒症的流行病学和患者预测因素。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jul;46(7):1394-1403. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06093-4. Epub 2020 May 28.
10
Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、地区和国家脓毒症发病率和死亡率,1990-2017 年:全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.