• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院前qSOFA参数评估与早期脓毒症靶向治疗相关吗?一项回顾性队列研究。

Is Prehospital Assessment of qSOFA Parameters Associated with Earlier Targeted Sepsis Therapy? A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Dankert André, Kraxner Jochen, Breitfeld Philipp, Bopp Clemens, Issleib Malte, Doehn Christoph, Bathe Janina, Krause Linda, Zöllner Christian, Petzoldt Martin

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, German Military Hospital Hamburg, Lesserstrasse 180, 22049 Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 17;11(12):3501. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123501.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11123501
PMID:35743570
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9224632/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine whether prehospital qSOFA (quick sequential organ failure assessment) assessment was associated with a shortened 'time to antibiotics' and 'time to intravenous fluid resuscitation' compared with standard assessment.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who were referred to our Emergency Department between 2014 and 2018 by emergency medical services, in whom sepsis was diagnosed during hospitalization. Two multivariable regression models were fitted, with and without qSOFA parameters, for 'time to antibiotics' (primary endpoint) and 'time to intravenous fluid resuscitation'.

RESULTS

In total, 702 patients were included. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that antibiotics and intravenous fluids were initiated earlier if infections were suspected and emergency medical services involved emergency physicians. A heart rate above 90/min was associated with a shortened time to antibiotics. If qSOFA parameters were added to the models, a respiratory rate ≥ 22/min and altered mentation were independent predictors for earlier antibiotics. A systolic blood pressure ≤ 100 mmHg and altered mentation were independent predictors for earlier fluids. When qSOFA parameters were added, the explained variability of the model increased by 24% and 38%, respectively (adjusted R² 0.106 versus 0.131 for antibiotics and 0.117 versus 0.162 for fluids).

CONCLUSION

Prehospital assessment of qSOFA parameters was associated with a shortened time to a targeted sepsis therapy.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定与标准评估相比,院前快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)是否与缩短“抗生素使用时间”和“静脉液体复苏时间”相关。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2014年至2018年间由紧急医疗服务机构转诊至我院急诊科、住院期间被诊断为脓毒症的患者。针对“抗生素使用时间”(主要终点)和“静脉液体复苏时间”,拟合了两个多变量回归模型,一个包含qSOFA参数,另一个不包含。

结果

总共纳入了702例患者。多元线性回归分析表明,如果怀疑感染且紧急医疗服务涉及急诊医生,则抗生素和静脉输液的开始时间会更早。心率高于90次/分钟与抗生素使用时间缩短相关。如果将qSOFA参数添加到模型中,呼吸频率≥22次/分钟和意识改变是抗生素使用更早的独立预测因素。收缩压≤100 mmHg和意识改变是液体复苏更早的独立预测因素。添加qSOFA参数后,模型的可解释变异性分别增加了24%和38%(抗生素使用时间的调整R²为0.106对0.131,液体复苏时间的调整R²为0.117对0.162)。

结论

院前评估qSOFA参数与缩短脓毒症靶向治疗时间相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f8f/9224632/09164062fb28/jcm-11-03501-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f8f/9224632/95fa878e6f89/jcm-11-03501-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f8f/9224632/7ce3080a3325/jcm-11-03501-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f8f/9224632/404d4020cbac/jcm-11-03501-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f8f/9224632/09164062fb28/jcm-11-03501-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f8f/9224632/95fa878e6f89/jcm-11-03501-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f8f/9224632/7ce3080a3325/jcm-11-03501-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f8f/9224632/404d4020cbac/jcm-11-03501-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f8f/9224632/09164062fb28/jcm-11-03501-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Is Prehospital Assessment of qSOFA Parameters Associated with Earlier Targeted Sepsis Therapy? A Retrospective Cohort Study.院前qSOFA参数评估与早期脓毒症靶向治疗相关吗?一项回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 17;11(12):3501. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123501.
2
Triage of Septic Patients Using qSOFA Criteria at the SAMU Regulation: A Retrospective Analysis.在急救调度中心使用qSOFA标准对脓毒症患者进行分诊:一项回顾性分析。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Jan-Feb;22(1):84-90. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1347733. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
3
The role of the quick sequential organ failure assessment score (qSOFA) and modified early warning score (MEWS) in the pre-hospitalization prediction of sepsis prognosis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分(qSOFA)和改良早期预警评分(MEWS)在脓毒症预后的院前预测中的作用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;41:158-162. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.09.049. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
4
qSOFA Has Poor Sensitivity for Prehospital Identification of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.qSOFA对院前严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的识别敏感性较差。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Jul-Aug;21(4):489-497. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2016.1274348. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
5
Relationship between the prehospital quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and prognosis in patients with sepsis or suspected sepsis: a population-based ORION registry.院前快速序贯器官衰竭评估与脓毒症或疑似脓毒症患者预后的关系:一项基于人群的ORION注册研究
Acute Med Surg. 2021 Aug 12;8(1):e675. doi: 10.1002/ams2.675. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
6
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.
7
Use of prehospital qSOFA in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with suspected infection: A retrospective cohort study.应用院前 qSOFA 预测疑似感染患者院内死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2019 May 7;14(5):e0216560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216560. eCollection 2019.
8
Prognostic value of prehospital quick sequential organ failure assessment score among patients with suspected infection.院前快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分对疑似感染患者的预后价值。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;26(5):329-333. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000570.
9
Quick sequential organ failure assessment compared to systemic inflammatory response syndrome for predicting sepsis in emergency department.快速序贯器官衰竭评估与全身炎症反应综合征对急诊科脓毒症的预测比较。
J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
Use of CRB-65 and quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment to predict site of care and mortality in pneumonia patients in the emergency department: a retrospective study.应用CRB-65和快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估预测急诊科肺炎患者的治疗地点和死亡率:一项回顾性研究
Crit Care. 2016 Jun 1;20(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1351-0.

引用本文的文献

1
A program to improve sepsis management in the Emergency Department: a multicenter prospective study in France.一项旨在改善急诊科脓毒症管理的项目:法国的一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1007/s11739-025-03877-8.
2
The performance of screening tools and use of blood analyses in prehospital identification of sepsis patients and patients suitable for non-conveyance - an observational study.在院前鉴别脓毒症患者和不适合转运患者中,筛选工具的表现和血液分析的使用 - 一项观察性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01098-4.
3
Sepsis incidence, suspicion, prediction and mortality in emergency medical services: a cohort study related to the current international sepsis guideline.

本文引用的文献

1
Time-to-antibiotics and clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a prospective nationwide multicenter cohort study.抗生素使用时间与脓毒症和感染性休克患者临床结局的相关性:一项前瞻性全国多中心队列研究。
Crit Care. 2022 Jan 13;26(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03883-0.
2
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):e1063-e1143. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337.
3
Early Care of Adults With Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department and Out-of-Hospital Environment: A Consensus-Based Task Force Report.
急诊医疗服务中的脓毒症发病率、疑似病例、预测和死亡率:与当前国际脓毒症指南相关的队列研究。
Infection. 2024 Aug;52(4):1325-1335. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02181-5. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
4
Pre-hospital Prognostic Factors of 30-Day Survival in Sepsis Patients; a Retrospective Cohort Study.脓毒症患者30天生存的院前预后因素;一项回顾性队列研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Jul 13;11(1):e48. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.2029. eCollection 2023.
急诊科和院外环境中疑似脓毒症成年患者的早期护理:基于共识的特别工作组报告
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;78(1):1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
4
Description of Emergency Medical Services, treatment of cardiac arrest patients and cardiac arrest registries in Europe.描述欧洲的紧急医疗服务、心脏骤停患者的治疗和心脏骤停登记处。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 19;28(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00798-7.
5
Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model.计算开发临床预测模型所需的样本量。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m441.
6
Accuracy of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score to Predict Sepsis Mortality in 121 Studies Including 1,716,017 Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在纳入1,716,017例个体的121项研究中,快速序贯器官功能衰竭评估评分预测脓毒症死亡率的准确性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Crit Care Explor. 2019 Sep 17;1(9):e0043. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000043. eCollection 2019 Sep.
7
Screening strategies to identify sepsis in the prehospital setting: a validation study.在院前环境中识别脓毒症的筛查策略:一项验证研究。
CMAJ. 2020 Mar 9;192(10):E230-E239. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190966.
8
Use of prehospital qSOFA in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with suspected infection: A retrospective cohort study.应用院前 qSOFA 预测疑似感染患者院内死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2019 May 7;14(5):e0216560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216560. eCollection 2019.
9
ED Door-to-Antibiotic Time and Long-term Mortality in Sepsis.ED 门到抗生素时间与脓毒症的长期死亡率。
Chest. 2019 May;155(5):938-946. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
10
Pre-hospital qSOFA as a predictor of sepsis and mortality.院前 qSOFA 作为脓毒症和死亡率的预测指标。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;37(7):1273-1278. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.09.025. Epub 2018 Sep 18.