Huabbangyang Thongpitak, Sangketchon Chunlanee, Noimo Gotchagorn, Pinthong Korawee, Saungun Ketvipa, Bunta Kaiwit, Saumok Chomkamol
Department of Disaster and Emergency Medical Operation, Faculty of Science and Health Technology, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 May 25;11(1):e41. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.2002. eCollection 2023.
Although the 2020 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines recommend that sodium bicarbonate (SB) be avoided during routine cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) a limited number of studies have examined the effects of SB injection during prolonged CPR (>15 min) in prehospital setting. The present study aimed to examine the effects of prehospital SB use during prolonged CPR on patients' outcome.
In this retrospective cross-sectional study adult patients aged >18 years who experienced a non-traumatic, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) were compared regarding three outcomes, namely return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), ROSC > 20 minute, and survival to discharge, based on receiving or not-receiving SB during CPR.
330 patients were divided into two equal groups of 165. The two groups had similar conditions regarding gender distribution (p = 0.729); mean age (p = 0.741); underlying diseases (p = 0.027); etiology of arrest (p = 0.135); the initial rhythm (p = 0.324); receiving normal saline solution (p = 1.000), epinephrine (p = 0.848), and atropine during CPR (p = 0.054); and using defibrillation (p = 0.324). Those who received SB had 0.80 times greater likelihood for sustained ROSC (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.47-1.37, p = 0.415), 0.93 times greater likelihood for ROSC at the scene (adjusted OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.55-1.59, p = 0.798), and 0.34 times greater likelihood for survival to discharge (adjusted OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.10-1.17, p = 0.087).
The present study demonstrated that prehospital SB use by EMS during prolonged CPR did not improve ROSC rate at the scene, sustained ROSC, and survival to discharge.
尽管2020年美国心脏协会(AHA)指南建议在常规心肺复苏(CPR)期间避免使用碳酸氢钠(SB),但在院前环境中,仅有少数研究探讨了在长时间心肺复苏(>15分钟)期间注射SB的效果。本研究旨在探讨在长时间心肺复苏期间院前使用SB对患者预后的影响。
在这项回顾性横断面研究中,比较了年龄>18岁的成年非创伤性院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的三个预后指标,即自主循环恢复(ROSC)、ROSC>20分钟以及出院存活情况,比较依据为心肺复苏期间是否接受SB治疗。
330例患者被平均分为两组,每组165例。两组在性别分布(p = 0.729)、平均年龄(p = 0.741)、基础疾病(p = 0.027)、心脏骤停病因(p = 0.135)、初始心律(p = 0.324)、心肺复苏期间接受生理盐水(p = 1.000)、肾上腺素(p = 0.848)和阿托品治疗(p = 0.054)以及使用除颤治疗(p = 0.324)等方面情况相似。接受SB治疗的患者实现持续性ROSC的可能性高0.80倍(调整后的优势比(OR)= 0.80,95%置信区间:0.47 - 1.37,p = 0.415),现场实现ROSC的可能性高0.93倍(调整后的OR = 0.93,95%置信区间:0.55 - 1.59,p = 0.798),出院存活的可能性高0.34倍(调整后的OR = 0.34,95%置信区间:0.10 - 1.17,p = 0.087)。
本研究表明,急救医疗服务人员在长时间心肺复苏期间院前使用SB并不能提高现场ROSC率、持续性ROSC以及出院存活率。