• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婴儿纤维胃镜吞咽功能评估(FEES)中吞咽后残留增加了吸入风险。

Risk of Aspiration Increased by Post-swallow Residue in Infant Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES).

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2024 Mar;134(3):1431-1436. doi: 10.1002/lary.30954. Epub 2023 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1002/lary.30954
PMID:37610281
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk of aspiration associated with post-swallow residue subsites in Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in bottle-fed infants <1 year of age.

METHODS

This is a retrospective matched-pairs cohort study at an academic tertiary children's hospital. FEES and Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS) trials performed within the same infant <5 days apart were paired by matching bolus consistency and bottle flow rate. Positive aspiration was defined by the "or rule" in which aspiration is positive when either FEES or VFSS within a matched pair is positive.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven FEES-VFSS matched pairs from 29 patients (16 males; mean [SD] age, 2.9 [2.8] months) were included. The rate of positive aspiration, as defined by the "or rule", was 59% (51/87). In FEES, post-swallow pyriform sinus residue was present in 16% (14/87) and anterior commissure residue 27% (31/87). Risk of positive aspiration was increased by pyriform sinus residue (odds ratio [OR] 5.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-19.3, p < 0.01) and anterior commissure residue in FEES (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-6.1, p = 0.03). In the neonate subgroup, <1 month of age, multivariate-adjusted analysis showed that anterior commissure residue had better diagnostic accuracy for aspiration than in older infants (overall 70% vs. 42%, p < 0.01; sensitivity 60% vs. 10%, p < 0.01), whereas pyriform sinus residue had worse accuracy (overall 41% vs. 70%, p = 0.02; sensitivity 13% vs. 43%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that pyriform sinus and anterior commissure residue during infant FEES were associated with fivefold and twofold increased risk of aspiration, respectively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3: Using a retrospective matched-pairs cohort, this study assesses the diagnostic accuracy of post-swallow residue in FEES for predicting aspiration. Laryngoscope, 134:1431-1436, 2024.

摘要

目的

评估在<1 岁婴儿中,使用纤维内镜吞咽评估(FEES)测量吞咽后残留部位与误吸风险的相关性。

方法

这是一项在学术性三级儿童医院进行的回顾性配对病例对照队列研究。FEES 和视频透视吞咽研究(VFSS)试验在同一婴儿<5 天内进行,通过匹配吞咽物稠度和奶瓶流速进行配对。FEES 或 VFSS 中的任一项检查阳性,即符合“或规则”,即可定义为阳性误吸。

结果

共纳入 29 例(16 例男性;平均[标准差]年龄 2.9[2.8]个月)29 例患者的 87 对 FEES-VFSS 检查。根据“或规则”,阳性误吸率为 59%(51/87)。在 FEES 中,吞咽后梨状隐窝残留率为 16%(14/87),前联合残留率为 27%(31/87)。FEES 中梨状隐窝残留(比值比[OR] 5.4,95%置信区间[CI] 1.9-19.3,p<0.01)和前联合残留(OR 2.5,95%CI 1.1-6.1,p=0.03)增加了阳性误吸的风险。在<1 个月龄的新生儿亚组中,多变量调整分析显示,前联合残留对误吸的诊断准确性优于年长婴儿(总体为 70%比 42%,p<0.01;敏感性为 60%比 10%,p<0.01),而梨状隐窝残留的准确性较差(总体为 41%比 70%,p=0.02;敏感性为 13%比 43%,p=0.02)。

结论

本研究表明,婴儿 FEES 中梨状隐窝和前联合残留分别与误吸风险增加 5 倍和 2 倍相关。

证据水平

3:本研究使用回顾性配对病例对照队列评估了 FEES 中吞咽后残留物预测误吸的诊断准确性。

相似文献

1
Risk of Aspiration Increased by Post-swallow Residue in Infant Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES).婴儿纤维胃镜吞咽功能评估(FEES)中吞咽后残留增加了吸入风险。
Laryngoscope. 2024 Mar;134(3):1431-1436. doi: 10.1002/lary.30954. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
2
Exploring the utility of fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in young children- A comparison with videofluoroscopy.探索纤维内镜吞咽功能评估在幼儿中的效用——与视频荧光吞咽造影的比较。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Nov;138:110339. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110339. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
3
Determining the Efficacy of the Chin-Down Maneuver Following Esophagectomy With Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing.经纤维内镜吞咽功能评估后,确定食管切除术后颏下牵引手法的疗效。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jun;100(6):1076-1084. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
4
Correlations between Aspiration and Pharyngeal Residue Scale Scores for Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation and Videofluoroscopy.纤维内镜评估和荧光透视吞咽功能检查中抽吸与咽部残留量表评分之间的相关性。
Yonsei Med J. 2019 Dec;60(12):1181-1186. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.12.1181.
5
Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Multidisciplinary Alternative for Assessment of Infants With Dysphagia in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.吞咽功能的纤维内镜评估:新生儿重症监护病房中吞咽困难婴儿评估的多学科替代方法
Adv Neonatal Care. 2016 Feb;16(1):37-43. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000245.
6
Concordance Between Aspiration Detected on Upper Gastrointestinal Series and Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study in Bottle-Fed Children.奶瓶喂养儿童上消化道造影检测到的误吸与视频荧光吞咽造影检查结果的一致性
Dysphagia. 2016 Aug;31(4):505-10. doi: 10.1007/s00455-016-9705-y. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
7
Static endoscopic swallow evaluation in children.儿童静态内镜吞咽评估。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Jun;130(6):1590-1594. doi: 10.1002/lary.28263. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
8
Adding Endoscopist-Directed Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing to the Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study Increased the Detection Rates of Penetration, Aspiration, and Pharyngeal Residue.在内镜检查吞咽功能的视频荧光吞咽造影检查中增加内镜医师指导下的柔性内镜吞咽评估,可提高穿透、误吸和咽部残留的检出率。
Gut Liver. 2015 Sep 23;9(5):623-8. doi: 10.5009/gnl14147.
9
Association Between Pharyngeal Pooling and Aspiration Using Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in Head and Neck Cancer Patients with Dysphagia.头颈部癌症吞咽困难患者应用纤维内镜吞咽功能评估的咽腔积液与误吸的相关性。
Dysphagia. 2020 Feb;35(1):42-51. doi: 10.1007/s00455-019-09992-x. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
10
Aspiration in the Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing Associated with an Increased Risk of Mortality in a Cohort of Patients Suspected of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.纤维内镜吞咽评估中吸入与疑诊口咽吞咽障碍患者队列死亡率增加的相关性。
Dysphagia. 2020 Apr;35(2):369-377. doi: 10.1007/s00455-019-10036-7. Epub 2019 Jul 20.