• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纤维内镜评估和荧光透视吞咽功能检查中抽吸与咽部残留量表评分之间的相关性。

Correlations between Aspiration and Pharyngeal Residue Scale Scores for Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation and Videofluoroscopy.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2019 Dec;60(12):1181-1186. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.12.1181.

DOI:10.3349/ymj.2019.60.12.1181
PMID:31769249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6881705/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine correlations among rating scales and findings suggestive of tracheal aspiration and pharyngeal residue between fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) in dysphagia patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied patients referred to our hospital for dysphagia assessment. Three raters judged the residue severity and laryngeal penetration or tracheal aspiration of FEES and VFSS. The raters applied the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) for tracheal aspiration and pixel-based circumscribed area ratio and Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity for post-swallow residue in VFSS and FEES, respectively. Anatomy-physiologic findings during FEES associated with tracheal aspiration were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 178 participants were enrolled in our study. In correlation analysis, PAS (=0.74), vallecula retention (=0.76), and pyriform sinus retention (=0.78) showed strong positive correlations between FEES and VFSS. Intra-rater agreement between VFSS and FEES was good for PAS (κ=0.65) and vallecula (κ=0.65) and pyriform sinus retention (κ=0.69). Among 72 patients who showed subglottic shelf residue, a suspected finding of aspiration, in FEES, 68 had concomitant tracheal aspiration during VFSS. Both vocal fold hypomobility and glottic gap during phonation were significantly associated with findings suggestive of tracheal aspiration during FEES (<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Quantitative and reliable aspiration and post swallow residue rating scales showed strong positive correlations and good agreement between VFSS and FEES.

摘要

目的

研究纤维内镜吞咽检查(FEES)与视频透视吞咽检查(VFSS)中提示气管吸入和咽部残留的评分与发现之间的相关性,以评估吞咽障碍患者的情况。

材料与方法

我们研究了因吞咽问题而被转诊到我院的患者。三位评估者分别对 FEES 和 VFSS 的咽部残留严重程度和喉穿透或气管吸入进行评估。评估者使用气管吸入的渗透-吸入量表(PAS)和基于像素的限定区域比以及耶鲁咽部残留严重程度,分别对 VFSS 和 FEES 的吞咽后残留进行评分。还分析了 FEES 期间与气管吸入相关的解剖生理发现。

结果

共有 178 名参与者参与了我们的研究。在相关性分析中,PAS(=0.74)、 vallecula 滞留(=0.76)和 pyriform 窦滞留(=0.78)在 FEES 和 VFSS 之间显示出强烈的正相关。PAS(κ=0.65)和 vallecula(κ=0.65)以及 pyriform 窦滞留(κ=0.69)在 VFSS 和 FEES 之间的评估者间一致性良好。在 72 名 FEES 中出现杓状软骨架残留(疑似吸入的可疑发现)的患者中,68 名患者在 VFSS 中同时出现气管吸入。声带运动不足和发声时声门间隙均与 FEES 中提示气管吸入的发现显著相关(<0.05)。

结论

定量且可靠的吸入和吞咽后残留评分在 VFSS 和 FEES 之间显示出强烈的正相关和良好的一致性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc8/6881705/ef429b7e3a04/ymj-60-1181-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc8/6881705/09caa45c9eaf/ymj-60-1181-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc8/6881705/ef429b7e3a04/ymj-60-1181-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc8/6881705/09caa45c9eaf/ymj-60-1181-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc8/6881705/ef429b7e3a04/ymj-60-1181-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Correlations between Aspiration and Pharyngeal Residue Scale Scores for Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation and Videofluoroscopy.纤维内镜评估和荧光透视吞咽功能检查中抽吸与咽部残留量表评分之间的相关性。
Yonsei Med J. 2019 Dec;60(12):1181-1186. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.12.1181.
2
Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scales Based on Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.基于吞咽功能纤维内镜评估的咽残留严重程度评定量表:一项系统评价
Dysphagia. 2016 Jun;31(3):352-9. doi: 10.1007/s00455-015-9682-6. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
3
Adding Endoscopist-Directed Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing to the Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study Increased the Detection Rates of Penetration, Aspiration, and Pharyngeal Residue.在内镜检查吞咽功能的视频荧光吞咽造影检查中增加内镜医师指导下的柔性内镜吞咽评估,可提高穿透、误吸和咽部残留的检出率。
Gut Liver. 2015 Sep 23;9(5):623-8. doi: 10.5009/gnl14147.
4
Determining the Efficacy of the Chin-Down Maneuver Following Esophagectomy With Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing.经纤维内镜吞咽功能评估后,确定食管切除术后颏下牵引手法的疗效。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jun;100(6):1076-1084. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
5
Exploring the utility of fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in young children- A comparison with videofluoroscopy.探索纤维内镜吞咽功能评估在幼儿中的效用——与视频荧光吞咽造影的比较。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Nov;138:110339. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110339. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
6
Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy: does examination type influence perception of pharyngeal residue severity?吞咽功能的纤维内镜评估与电视荧光吞咽造影检查:检查类型是否会影响对咽部残留严重程度的判断?
Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Oct;31(5):425-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01292.x.
7
The Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale: An Anatomically Defined and Image-Based Tool.耶鲁咽残留严重程度评定量表:一种基于解剖学定义和图像的工具。
Dysphagia. 2015 Oct;30(5):521-8. doi: 10.1007/s00455-015-9631-4. Epub 2015 Jun 7.
8
Correlation Between Pharyngeal Residue and Aspiration in Fiber-Optic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: An Observational Study.纤维光学吞咽评估中咽残留与误吸的相关性:一项观察性研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Mar;100(3):488-494. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.028. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
9
Risk of Aspiration Increased by Post-swallow Residue in Infant Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES).婴儿纤维胃镜吞咽功能评估(FEES)中吞咽后残留增加了吸入风险。
Laryngoscope. 2024 Mar;134(3):1431-1436. doi: 10.1002/lary.30954. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
10
Pharyngeal Residue Severity and Aspiration Risk in Stroke Patient Using Fiber-Optic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing.使用纤维光学吞咽评估对脑卒中患者的咽残留严重程度和吸入风险进行评估。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2023;75(3):158-163. doi: 10.1159/000528204. Epub 2022 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Predictors of Dysphagia in Acute and Subacute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Retrospective Observational Study.急性和亚急性创伤性颈脊髓损伤吞咽困难的临床预测因素:一项回顾性观察研究
Dysphagia. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1007/s00455-025-10865-9.
2
Acoustic Correlation with Dysphagia in Stroke Patients.中风患者吞咽困难的声学相关性
Dysphagia. 2025 May 4. doi: 10.1007/s00455-025-10830-6.
3
Swallowing function management in patients with disorders of consciousness: a scoping review.意识障碍患者吞咽功能管理:一项范围综述

本文引用的文献

1
Parameters of Instrumental Swallowing Evaluations: Describing a Diagnostic Dilemma.仪器吞咽评估参数:描述一个诊断难题。
Dysphagia. 2016 Jun;31(3):462-72. doi: 10.1007/s00455-016-9700-3. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
2
Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scales Based on Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.基于吞咽功能纤维内镜评估的咽残留严重程度评定量表:一项系统评价
Dysphagia. 2016 Jun;31(3):352-9. doi: 10.1007/s00455-015-9682-6. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
3
The Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale: An Anatomically Defined and Image-Based Tool.
Front Neurosci. 2025 Apr 16;19:1595393. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1595393. eCollection 2025.
4
Early application value of flexible laryngoscope swallowing function assessment in patients after partial laryngectomy.纤维喉镜吞咽功能评估在喉部分切除术后患者中的早期应用价值
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 19;15(1):6040. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86799-x.
5
Pharyngeal Residues Scoring through the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS): Efficacy of Training.通过耶鲁咽残留严重程度评定量表(YPRSRS)进行咽残留评分:训练效果
Dysphagia. 2025 Feb;40(1):271-281. doi: 10.1007/s00455-024-10725-y. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
6
Systematic approach to contextualize findings of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in neurogenic dysphagia- towards an integrated FEES report.神经源性吞咽困难中吞咽功能的软性内镜评估结果情境化的系统方法——迈向一份综合的功能性内镜吞咽评估报告
Neurol Res Pract. 2024 May 9;6(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s42466-024-00321-8.
7
Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for dysphagia patients during recovery stage of stroke: a randomized controlled trial.经颅磁刺激θ爆发治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者的随机对照试验
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Oct;59(5):543-553. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08023-1. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
8
Consistencies among miscellaneous scales for evaluation of post-stroke dysphagia.各种用于评估卒中后吞咽障碍的量表的一致性。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Oct;280(10):4561-4567. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08101-x. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
9
Non-Contact Assessment of Swallowing Dysfunction Using Smartphone Captured Skin Displacements.使用智能手机采集的皮肤位移对吞咽功能障碍进行非接触式评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 7;23(12):5392. doi: 10.3390/s23125392.
10
Intra and interobserver agreement of the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity Scale (DIGEST) in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES): the importance of observer-tailored training.纤维内镜吞咽功能评估(FEES)中吞咽毒性动态成像分级量表(DIGEST)的观察者内和观察者间一致性:观察者量身定制培训的重要性。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jun;280(6):2865-2876. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07840-1. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
耶鲁咽残留严重程度评定量表:一种基于解剖学定义和图像的工具。
Dysphagia. 2015 Oct;30(5):521-8. doi: 10.1007/s00455-015-9631-4. Epub 2015 Jun 7.
4
Image-based measurement of post-swallow residue: the normalized residue ratio scale.基于图像的吞咽后残留测量:标准化残留比量表。
Dysphagia. 2013 Jun;28(2):167-77. doi: 10.1007/s00455-012-9426-9. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
5
The videofluorographic swallowing study.电视荧光吞咽造影检查
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2008 Nov;19(4):769-85, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2008.06.004.
6
Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare?评估误吸与渗透情况:吞咽的视频荧光造影检查和纤维光学内镜吞咽功能检查结果有何差异?
Laryngoscope. 2007 Oct;117(10):1723-7. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318123ee6a.
7
Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy: does examination type influence perception of pharyngeal residue severity?吞咽功能的纤维内镜评估与电视荧光吞咽造影检查:检查类型是否会影响对咽部残留严重程度的判断?
Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Oct;31(5):425-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01292.x.
8
Evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia: which diagnostic tool is superior?口咽吞咽困难的评估:哪种诊断工具更具优势?
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Dec;11(6):485-9. doi: 10.1097/00020840-200312000-00014.
9
Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.吞咽功能的纤维内镜评估
Laryngoscope. 2003 Aug;113(8):1386-93. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200308000-00023.
10
Interjudge and intrajudge reliabilities in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (fees) using the penetration-aspiration scale: a replication study.使用渗透-误吸量表进行吞咽功能的纤维内镜评估(FEES)时的评判者间和评判者内信度:一项重复研究。
Dysphagia. 2002 Fall;17(4):308-15. doi: 10.1007/s00455-002-0073-4.