Suppr超能文献

多组分家庭基础物理治疗与髋部骨折后常规护理的恢复比较。

Multicomponent Home-based Physical Therapy Versus Usual Care for Recovery After Hip Fracture.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Dec;104(12):2011-2018. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 Aug 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the effect of 2 home-based 16-week multi-component physical therapy interventions on functional recovery compared to usual care after hip fracture.

DESIGN

Cross-study comparison using participants from the Community Ambulation Project (CAP; a randomized controlled trial) were compared to the Baltimore Hip Studies-seventh cohort (BHS-7; an observational cohort study) at 3 different time points (CAP: 15, 31, 55 weeks; BHS-7: 8, 26, and 52 weeks).

SETTING

General community PARTICIPANTS: Combined convenience sample of hip-fracture patients 8-26 weeks post admission from a prospective cohort study and randomized controlled trial. (N=549) INTERVENTIONS: CAP participants were randomized to one of 2 interventions (PUSH: specific multi-component intervention; PULSE: non-specific multi-component intervention) after standard rehabilitation; BHS-7 participants received usual care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean function (as measured by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and gait speed) was estimated in each cohort as quadratic functions of time using data from 3 post-fracture assessments in both studies (CAP: 15, 31, 55 weeks; BHS-7: 8, 26, and 52 weeks).

RESULTS

The harmonized samples included 101 PUSH, 100 PULSE, and 128 BHS-7 participants that had different demographic and clinical characteristics. Mean baseline SPPB scores (meters per second) were PUSH: 5.5 (SD=2.2), PULSE: 5.5 (SD=2.4), and BHS-7: 4.6 (SD=2.5); and mean gait speeds were 0.60 m/s (SD=0.20) for PUSH, 0.59 m/s (SD=0.17) for PULSE, and 0.46 m/s SD=(0.21) for BHS-7, respectively. Estimated between-group differences for SPPB improvement from 75 days to 1-year post admission were 0.7 (P=.04) in PUSH vs BHS-7; and 0.9 (P=.01) in PULSE vs BHS-7. Mean differences in change in gait speed were 0.08 (P=.002) for PUSH vs BHS-7; and 0.06 (P=.02) PULSE vs BHS-7 (P=.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this cross-study comparison that combined participants from 2 separate studies, with different designs and samples, suggest that home-based multi-component physical therapy programs were associated with greater functional improvement after hip fracture compared to usual care.

摘要

目的

比较两种基于家庭的 16 周多组分物理治疗干预措施与髋部骨折后常规护理相比在功能恢复方面的效果。

设计

使用社区活动项目(CAP;一项随机对照试验)的参与者进行跨研究比较,并与巴尔的摩髋部研究第七队列(BHS-7;一项观察队列研究)在 3 个不同时间点(CAP:15、31、55 周;BHS-7:8、26 和 52 周)进行比较。

地点

一般社区

参与者

前瞻性队列研究和随机对照试验中入院后 8-26 周的髋部骨折患者的综合便利样本(N=549)。

干预措施

CAP 参与者在标准康复后随机分配到 2 种干预措施之一(PUSH:特定多组分干预;PULSE:非特定多组分干预);BHS-7 参与者接受常规护理。

主要观察指标

使用两项研究中 3 次骨折后评估的数据,在每个队列中,使用短体物理表现电池(SPPB)和步速的平均功能(以 SPPB 和步速表示)作为时间的二次函数进行估计(CAP:15、31、55 周;BHS-7:8、26 和 52 周)。

结果

协调样本包括 101 名 PUSH、100 名 PULSE 和 128 名 BHS-7 参与者,他们具有不同的人口统计学和临床特征。平均基线 SPPB 评分(米/秒)为 PUSH:5.5(SD=2.2),PULSE:5.5(SD=2.4),BHS-7:4.6(SD=2.5);平均步速分别为 PUSH:0.60m/s(SD=0.20),PULSE:0.59m/s(SD=0.17),BHS-7:0.46m/s(SD=0.21)。从入院后 75 天到 1 年的 SPPB 改善的估计组间差异为:PUSH 与 BHS-7 相比为 0.7(P=.04);PULSE 与 BHS-7 相比为 0.9(P=.01)。步态速度变化的平均差异为:PUSH 与 BHS-7 相比为 0.08(P=.002);PULSE 与 BHS-7 相比为 0.06(P=.02)(P=.02)。

结论

这项跨研究比较的结果结合了来自两项不同设计和样本的独立研究的参与者,表明与常规护理相比,基于家庭的多组分物理治疗方案与髋部骨折后更大的功能改善相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6418/10840126/b85311cd3124/nihms-1928391-f0001.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Physical Therapy Management of Older Adults With Hip Fracture.老年人髋部骨折的物理治疗管理。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Feb;51(2):CPG1-CPG81. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2021.0301.
8
Non-pharmacological treatments for pain relief: TENS and acupuncture.非药物止痛治疗:经皮电神经刺激和针灸。
Joint Bone Spine. 2017 Dec;84(6):657-661. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验