Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Arcadia University, Glenside, Pennsylvania.
JAMA. 2019 Sep 10;322(10):946-956. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.12964.
Disability persists after hip fracture in older persons. Current rehabilitation may not be sufficient to restore ability to walk in the community.
To compare a multicomponent home-based physical therapy intervention (training) with an active control on ability to walk in the community.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Parallel, 2-group randomized clinical trial conducted at 3 US clinical centers (Arcadia University, University of Connecticut Health Center, and University of Maryland, Baltimore). Randomization began on September 16, 2013, and ended on June 20, 2017; follow-up ended on October 17, 2017. Patients aged 60 years and older were enrolled after nonpathologic, minimal trauma hip fracture, if they were living in the community and walking without human assistance before the fracture, were assessed within 26 weeks of hospitalization, and were not able to walk during daily activities at the time of enrollment. A total of 210 participants were randomized and reassessed 16 and 40 weeks later.
The training intervention (active treatment) (n = 105) included aerobic, strength, balance, and functional training. The active control group (n = 105) received transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and active range-of-motion exercises. Both groups received 2 to 3 home visits from a physical therapist weekly for 16 weeks; nutritional counseling; and daily vitamin D (2000 IU), calcium (600 mg), and multivitamins.
The primary outcome (community ambulation) was defined as walking 300 m or more in 6 minutes at 16 weeks after randomization. The study was designed to test a 1-sided hypothesis of superiority of training compared with active control.
Among 210 randomized participants (mean age, 80.8 years; 161 women [76.7%]), 197 (93.8%) completed the trial (187 [89.0%] by completing the 6-minute walk test at 16 weeks and 10 [4.8%] by adjudication of the primary outcome). Among these, 22 of 96 training participants (22.9%) and 18 of 101 active control participants (17.8%) (difference, 5.1% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 16.3%]; 1-sided P = .19) became community ambulators. Seventeen training participants (16.2%) and 15 control participants (14.3%) had 1 or more reportable adverse events during the intervention period. The most common reportable adverse events reported were falls (training: 6 [5.7%], control: 4 [3.8%]), femur/hip fracture (2 in each group), pneumonia (training: 2, control: 0), urinary tract infection (training: 2, control: 0), dehydration (training: 0, control: 2), and dyspnea (training: 0, control: 2).
Among older adults with a hip fracture, a multicomponent home-based physical therapy intervention compared with an active control that included transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and active range-of-motion exercises did not result in a statistically significant improvement in the ability to walk 300 m or more in 6 minutes after 16 weeks.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01783704.
老年人髋部骨折后仍存在残疾。目前的康复治疗可能不足以恢复在社区行走的能力。
比较多组分家庭为基础的物理治疗干预(训练)与主动对照组在社区行走能力方面的差异。
设计、地点和参与者:在 3 个美国临床中心(阿卡迪亚大学、康涅狄格大学健康中心和马里兰大学巴尔的摩分校)进行的平行、2 组随机临床试验。随机分组于 2013 年 9 月 16 日开始,2017 年 6 月 20 日结束;随访于 2017 年 10 月 17 日结束。60 岁及以上患者在非病理性、轻微创伤性髋部骨折后入院,如果他们在骨折前居住在社区,并且能够在没有他人帮助的情况下行走,在住院后 26 周内进行评估,并且在入组时无法在日常活动中行走,则被纳入研究。共有 210 名患者被随机分组,在 16 周和 40 周后再次进行评估。
训练干预(主动治疗)(n=105)包括有氧运动、力量、平衡和功能训练。主动对照组(n=105)接受经皮电神经刺激和主动关节活动度练习。两组患者每周都接受 16 周的物理治疗师 2 至 3 次家访;营养咨询;以及每天服用 2000IU 维生素 D、600mg 钙和多种维生素。
主要结局(社区行走能力)定义为随机分组后 16 周时在 6 分钟内行走 300 米或以上。该研究旨在检验训练与主动对照组相比具有优越性的单侧假设。
在 210 名随机参与者中(平均年龄 80.8 岁;161 名女性[76.7%]),197 名(93.8%)完成了试验(187 名[89.0%]通过完成 16 周时的 6 分钟步行测试,10 名[4.8%]通过主要结局的裁决)。在这些参与者中,96 名训练组中有 22 名(22.9%)和 101 名主动对照组中有 18 名(17.8%)(差异,5.1%[单侧 97.5%置信区间,-∞至 16.3%];单侧 P=0.19)成为社区行走者。17 名训练组参与者(16.2%)和 15 名对照组参与者(14.3%)在干预期间有 1 次或多次报告的不良事件。最常见的报告不良事件是跌倒(训练组:6[5.7%],对照组:4[3.8%])、股骨/髋部骨折(每组 2 例)、肺炎(训练组:2 例,对照组:0 例)、尿路感染(训练组:2 例,对照组:0 例)、脱水(训练组:0 例,对照组:2 例)和呼吸困难(训练组:0 例,对照组:2 例)。
在髋部骨折的老年人中,与包括经皮电神经刺激和主动关节活动度练习的主动对照组相比,多组分家庭为基础的物理治疗干预并未在 16 周后提高 300 米或以上的行走能力。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01783704。