• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

获得幸福——积极情绪对捐赠的因果影响的在线实验。

Get the happiness out-An online experiment on the causal effects of positive emotions on giving.

机构信息

Institute of Economics, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.

Institute of Sociology, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Aug 23;18(8):e0290283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290283. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0290283
PMID:37611005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10446232/
Abstract

Our study provides new evidence on the impact of positive emotions on voluntary contributions to public goods in a natural setting. Using a lab-in-field experiment, we induce positive incidental emotions randomly and analyze their effects on donations using a dictator game with multiple beneficiaries. Although we find no significant overall effect of positive incidental emotions on donation levels, our results show a significant shift in the allocation of donations towards the host charity. These findings shed light on the complex role of emotions in donation behavior and can provide valuable insights for organizations seeking to increase charitable giving.

摘要

我们的研究在自然环境下提供了关于积极情绪对公共物品自愿贡献影响的新证据。通过一项实验室现场实验,我们随机引发积极的偶然情绪,并使用具有多个受益人的独裁者博弈来分析它们对捐赠的影响。尽管我们没有发现积极偶然情绪对捐赠水平的总体显著影响,但我们的结果显示捐赠的分配方向明显偏向于主办慈善机构。这些发现揭示了情绪在捐赠行为中的复杂作用,并为寻求增加慈善捐赠的组织提供了有价值的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eff/10446232/8bdd466b7c6c/pone.0290283.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eff/10446232/fb255b0bd2cd/pone.0290283.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eff/10446232/27e5ba580d44/pone.0290283.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eff/10446232/8bdd466b7c6c/pone.0290283.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eff/10446232/fb255b0bd2cd/pone.0290283.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eff/10446232/27e5ba580d44/pone.0290283.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6eff/10446232/8bdd466b7c6c/pone.0290283.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Get the happiness out-An online experiment on the causal effects of positive emotions on giving.获得幸福——积极情绪对捐赠的因果影响的在线实验。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 23;18(8):e0290283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290283. eCollection 2023.
2
The relationship between charitable giving and emotional facial expressions: Results from affective computing.慈善捐赠与面部情感表达之间的关系:情感计算的结果。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 15;10(2):e23728. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23728. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
3
Voluntary or reluctant? Social influence in charitable giving: an ERP study.自愿还是被迫?慈善捐赠中的社会影响:一项 ERP 研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Mar 14;18(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsad010.
4
Multivariate pattern analysis of electroencephalography data reveals information predictive of charitable giving.多变量模式分析脑电图数据揭示了预测慈善捐赠的信息。
Neuroimage. 2021 Nov 15;242:118475. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118475. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
5
Charity preferences and perceived impact moderate charitable giving and associated neural response.慈善偏好和感知影响会调节慈善捐赠行为及其相关的神经反应。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Sep 17;160:107957. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107957. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
6
Framing in multiple public goods games and donation to charities.多种公共物品博弈中的框架构建与慈善捐赠
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 May 5;8(5):202117. doi: 10.1098/rsos.202117.
7
The influencing factor model and empirical research of TikTok charity live streaming impact users' online charitable donation.TikTok 慈善直播影响用户在线慈善捐赠的影响因素模型与实证研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 13;18(11):e0294186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294186. eCollection 2023.
8
On Reminder Effects, Drop-Outs and Dominance: Evidence from an Online Experiment on Charitable Giving.关于提醒效应、退出情况和主导性:来自慈善捐赠在线实验的证据。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 7;10(8):e0134705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134705. eCollection 2015.
9
Overcoming beneficiary race as an impediment to charitable donations: social dominance orientation, the experience of moral elevation, and donation behavior.克服受益对象的种族因素对慈善捐赠的阻碍:社会支配取向、道德升华体验与捐赠行为。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Jan;35(1):72-84. doi: 10.1177/0146167208325415. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
10
Framing charitable donations as exceptional expenses increases giving.将慈善捐赠视为特殊支出会增加捐赠。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2015 Jun;21(2):130-9. doi: 10.1037/xap0000047. Epub 2015 Apr 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Demotivating incentives and motivation crowding out in charitable giving.慈善捐赠中的动机弱化激励和动机挤出。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 11;114(28):7301-7306. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616921114. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
2
Gratitude and prosocial behavior: helping when it costs you.感恩与亲社会行为:在付出代价时提供帮助。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Apr;17(4):319-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01705.x.