• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慈善捐赠中的动机弱化激励和动机挤出。

Demotivating incentives and motivation crowding out in charitable giving.

机构信息

Department of Economics, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 11;114(28):7301-7306. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616921114. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1616921114
PMID:28655844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5514700/
Abstract

Research has shown that extrinsic incentives can crowd out intrinsic motivation in many contexts. Despite this, many nonprofits offer conditional thank-you gifts, such as mugs or tote bags, in exchange for donations. In collaboration with a nonprofit, this study implements a direct mail field experiment and demonstrates that thank-you gifts reduced donation rates in a fundraising campaign. Attention-based multiattribute choice models suggest that this is because prospective donors shift attention to the salient gift offer, causing them to underweight less salient intrinsic motives. Attention to the gift may also cause individuals to adopt a more cost-benefit mindset, further de-emphasizing intrinsic motives. Consistent with these hypotheses, crowding out was driven by those who donated higher amounts in the previous year (i.e., those who likely had higher intrinsic motivation). In a complementary online experiment, thank-you gifts also reduced donation rates but only when the gift was visually salient. This corroborates the mediating role of attention in crowding out. Taken together, the laboratory and field results demonstrate that this fundraising technique can be demotivating in some contexts and that this may occur through an attention-based mechanism.

摘要

研究表明,在许多情况下,外在激励会挤出内在动机。尽管如此,许多非营利组织仍提供有条件的感谢礼物,如杯子或手提袋,以换取捐款。本研究与一家非营利组织合作,实施了一项直邮现场实验,证明感谢礼物会降低筹款活动中的捐款率。基于注意力的多属性选择模型表明,这是因为潜在捐赠者将注意力转移到明显的礼物上,导致他们对不太明显的内在动机重视不足。对礼物的关注也可能导致个人采用更注重成本效益的思维方式,进一步淡化内在动机。这些假设得到了验证,挤出效应是由那些在前一年捐款较多的人(即那些可能有更高内在动机的人)驱动的。在一项补充的在线实验中,感谢礼物也降低了捐款率,但只有当礼物在视觉上很明显时才会如此。这证实了注意力在挤出效应中的中介作用。综上所述,实验室和现场实验结果表明,这种筹款技术在某些情况下可能会产生负面影响,而这可能是通过基于注意力的机制发生的。

相似文献

1
Demotivating incentives and motivation crowding out in charitable giving.慈善捐赠中的动机弱化激励和动机挤出。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 11;114(28):7301-7306. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616921114. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
2
Behavioral economics. Avoiding overhead aversion in charity.行为经济学。避免慈善中的管理费用厌恶。
Science. 2014 Oct 31;346(6209):632-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1253932.
3
The Interactive Effect of Incentive Salience and Prosocial Motivation on Prosocial Behavior.激励显著性与亲社会动机对亲社会行为的交互影响。
Psychol Sci. 2024 Apr;35(4):390-404. doi: 10.1177/09567976241234560. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
4
Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations.对税收和自愿捐赠的神经反应揭示了慈善捐赠的动机。
Science. 2007 Jun 15;316(5831):1622-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1140738.
5
Another reason for the counterintuitive effects of thank-you gifts on charitable giving.感谢礼物对慈善捐赠产生违反直觉效果的另一个原因。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 29;13:908556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.908556. eCollection 2022.
6
An experimental test of fundraising appeals targeting donor and recipient benefits.针对捐赠者和受赠者利益的筹款呼吁的实验测试。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1339-1348. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01095-8. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
7
Framing charitable donations as exceptional expenses increases giving.将慈善捐赠视为特殊支出会增加捐赠。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2015 Jun;21(2):130-9. doi: 10.1037/xap0000047. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
8
Blood donors' helping behavior is driven by warm glow: more evidence for the blood donor benevolence hypothesis.献血者的助人行为是由温暖的光芒驱动的:更多支持献血者仁慈假设的证据。
Transfusion. 2012 Oct;52(10):2189-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03557.x. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
9
The Psychology of (In)Effective Altruism.(无效)利他主义的心理学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Jul;25(7):596-607. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 May 4.
10
When Payment Undermines the Pitch.当薪酬破坏了推销。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Oct;27(10):1388-1397. doi: 10.1177/0956797616638841. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
VCP's nuclear journey: Initiated by interacting with KPNB1 to repair DNA damage.VCP的核内进程:通过与核转运蛋白β1相互作用启动以修复DNA损伤。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 May 13;122(19):e2416045122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2416045122. Epub 2025 May 8.
2
Manipulating attention facilitates cooperation.操控注意力有助于合作。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Mar 17;3(1):39. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00206-9.
3
The more the better? Synergies of prosocial interventions and effects on behavioural spillovers.越多越好?亲社会干预的协同作用及其对行为溢出效应的影响。
J Environ Econ Manage. 2024 Nov;128:None. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2024.103061.
4
Examining the replicability of online experiments selected by a decision market.检验由决策市场挑选出的在线实验的可重复性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Feb;9(2):316-330. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02062-9. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
5
Get the happiness out-An online experiment on the causal effects of positive emotions on giving.获得幸福——积极情绪对捐赠的因果影响的在线实验。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 23;18(8):e0290283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290283. eCollection 2023.
6
No good deed goes unpunished: the social costs of prosocial behaviour.善有恶报:亲社会行为的社会成本。
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Jul 21;3:e40. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.35. eCollection 2021.
7
Lateral reading and monetary incentives to spot disinformation about science.横向阅读和货币激励以发现有关科学的虚假信息。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 5;12(1):5678. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09168-y.
8
Strategies to increase downloads of COVID-19 exposure notification apps: A discrete choice experiment.增加 COVID-19 接触通知应用程序下载量的策略:离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 1;16(11):e0258945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258945. eCollection 2021.
9
An experimental test of fundraising appeals targeting donor and recipient benefits.针对捐赠者和受赠者利益的筹款呼吁的实验测试。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1339-1348. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01095-8. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Behavioral economics. Avoiding overhead aversion in charity.行为经济学。避免慈善中的管理费用厌恶。
Science. 2014 Oct 31;346(6209):632-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1253932.
2
The attentional drift-diffusion model extends to simple purchasing decisions.注意力漂移扩散模型可扩展到简单的购买决策。
Front Psychol. 2012 Jun 13;3:193. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00193. eCollection 2012.
3
Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving.测试慈善捐赠中的利他主义和社会压力。
Q J Econ. 2012;127(1):1-56. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr050.
4
Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions.多选项漂移扩散模型预测了基于价值的决策中视觉注视点与选择之间的关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13852-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101328108. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
5
Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.视觉注视与简单选择中的价值计算和比较。
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Oct;13(10):1292-8. doi: 10.1038/nn.2635. Epub 2010 Sep 12.
6
Effort for payment. A tale of two markets.为报酬付出努力。两个市场的故事。
Psychol Sci. 2004 Nov;15(11):787-93. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00757.x.