Room R
Cancer Res. 1979 Jul;39(7 Pt 2):2830-3.
Quantitative information on alcohol consumption patterns derives from four possible sources: indirect measures, observational studies, aggregate consumption statistics, and sample surveys of general populations. The potentials and problems of each method are briefly discussed, with primary attention to the various traditions of survey questioning and data analysis. While medically oriented epidemiologists have often used only an overall drinking volume measure, social scientists have pointed to the importance also of variability in characterizing drinking, particularly in relation to social and casualty as opposed to chronic health problems with drinking. The dimensions of drinking patterns which might be relevant to hypothesized linkages of alcohol and cancer are discussed. It is suggested that measurement will need to extend beyond volume of drinking and may indeed involve studies of new kinds of dimensions in the patterning of drinking.
间接测量、观察性研究、总消费量统计以及普通人群的样本调查。本文简要讨论了每种方法的潜力和问题,主要关注调查提问和数据分析的各种传统。虽然以医学为导向的流行病学家通常只使用总体饮酒量指标,但社会科学家指出,在描述饮酒情况时,饮酒差异也很重要,特别是相对于与饮酒相关的慢性健康问题而言,在社交和意外伤害方面。本文讨论了可能与酒精和癌症的假设联系相关的饮酒模式维度。建议测量需要超越饮酒量,实际上可能涉及对饮酒模式中新型维度的研究。