Suppr超能文献

生物标志物引导的肾脏保护脓毒症集束化治疗的可行性评估:脓毒症中限制急性肾损伤进展试验

Feasibility Assessment of a Biomarker-Guided Kidney-Sparing Sepsis Bundle: The Limiting Acute Kidney Injury Progression In Sepsis Trial.

作者信息

Gómez Hernando, Zarbock Alexander, Pastores Stephen M, Frendl Gyorgy, Bercker Sven, Asfar Pierre, Conrad Steven A, Creteur Jaques, Miner James, Mira Jean Paul, Motsch Johan, Quenot Jean-Pierre, Rimmelé Thomas, Rosenberger Peter, Vinsonneau Christophe, Birch Bob, Heskia Fabienne, Textoris Julien, Molinari Luca, Guzzi Louis M, Ronco Claudio, Kellum John A

机构信息

Program for Critical Care Nephrology, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2023 Aug 21;5(8):e0961. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000961. eCollection 2023 Aug.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a biomarker-guided implementation of a kidney-sparing sepsis bundle (KSSB) of care in comparison with standard of care (SOC) on clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.

DESIGN

Adaptive, multicenter, randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Five University Hospitals in Europe and North America.

PATIENTS

Adult patients, admitted to the ICU with an indwelling urinary catheter and diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock, without acute kidney injury (acute kidney injury) stage 2 or 3 or chronic kidney disease.

INTERVENTIONS

A three-level KSSB based on Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGOs) recommendations guided by serial measurements of urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 used as a combined biomarker [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7].

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The trial was stopped for low enrollment related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Nineteen patients enrolled in five sites over 12 months were randomized to the SOC ( = 8, 42.0%) or intervention ( = 11, 58.0%). The primary outcome was feasibility, and key secondary outcomes were safety and efficacy. Adherence to protocol in patients assigned to the first two levels of KSSB was 15 of 19 (81.8%) and 19 of 19 (100%) but was 1 of 4 (25%) for level 3 KSSB. Serious adverse events were more frequent in the intervention arm (4/11, 36.4%) than in the control arm (1/8, 12.5%), but none were related to study interventions. The secondary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, dialysis, or progression of greater than or equal to 2 stages of acute kidney injury within 72 hours after enrollment and was reached by 3 of 8 (37.5%) patients in the control arm, and 0 of 11 (0%) patients in the intervention arm. In the control arm, two patients experienced progression of acute kidney injury, and one patient died.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the COVID-19 pandemic impeded recruitment, the actual implementation of a therapeutic strategy that deploys a KDIGO-based KSSB of care guided by risk stratification using urinary [TIMP2]•[IGFBP7] seems feasible and appears to be safe in patients with sepsis.

摘要

目的

确定与标准治疗(SOC)相比,生物标志物引导实施的肾脏保护脓毒症综合治疗方案(KSSB)在脓毒症患者临床结局方面的可行性、安全性和有效性。

设计

适应性、多中心、随机临床试验。

地点

欧洲和北美的五家大学医院。

患者

成年患者,因留置导尿管入住重症监护病房,诊断为脓毒症或脓毒性休克,无急性肾损伤(AKI)2期或3期或慢性肾脏病。

干预措施

基于肾脏病改善全球预后(KDIGO)建议的三级KSSB,通过连续测量尿金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂-2和胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白7作为联合生物标志物[TIMP2]•[IGFBP7]进行指导。

测量指标和主要结果

由于与2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行相关的入组率低,试验提前终止。在12个月内,五个地点的19名患者被随机分配至SOC组(n = 8,42.0%)或干预组(n = 11,58.0%)。主要结局是可行性,关键次要结局是安全性和有效性。分配至KSSB前两级的患者方案依从率分别为19例中的15例(81.8%)和19例中的19例(100%),但KSSB三级的依从率为4例中的1例(25%)。干预组严重不良事件的发生率(4/11,36.4%)高于对照组(1/8,12.5%),但均与研究干预措施无关。次要有效性结局是入组后72小时内死亡、透析或急性肾损伤进展≥2期的复合结局,对照组8例患者中有3例(37.5%)达到该结局,干预组11例患者中无1例(0%)达到该结局。在对照组中,2例患者出现急性肾损伤进展,1例患者死亡。

结论

尽管COVID-19大流行阻碍了入组,但采用基于KDIGO的KSSB并以尿[TIMP2]•[IGFBP7]进行风险分层指导的治疗策略实际实施起来似乎可行,且对脓毒症患者似乎是安全的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d21/10443738/138abce000e6/cc9-5-e0961-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验