Walcott Rebecca, Schmidt Carly, Kaminsky Marina, Singh Roopal Jyoti, Anderson Leigh, Desai Sapna, de Hoop Thomas
American Institutes for Research, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
State of Washington, Olympia, WA, USA.
Gates Open Res. 2023 Jul 20;7:111. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.14771.1. eCollection 2023.
Interventions with women's groups are increasingly seen as an important strategy for advancing women's empowerment, health, and economic outcomes in low- and middle-income countries, with the potential to increase the resiliency of members and their communities during widespread covariate shocks, such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This evidence synthesis compiles evidence from past shocks on women's group activities and the extent to which women's groups mitigate the effects of shocks on members and communities. We reviewed 90 documents from academic databases, organizational reports, and additional gray literature, and included literature diverse in geography, type of women's group, and shock. The literature suggests that covariate shocks tend to disrupt group activities and reduce group resources, but linkages to formal institutions can mitigate this impact by extending credit beyond the shock-affected resource pool. Evidence was largely supportive of women's groups providing resilience to members and communities, though findings varied according to shock severity, group purpose and structure, and outcome measures. Further, actions to support individual resilience during a shock, such as increased payment flexibility, may run counter to group resilience. The findings of the evidence synthesis are largely consistent with emerging evidence about women's groups and COVID-19 in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. We finalize the paper with a discussion on policy implications, including the importance of sustainable access to financial resources for women's group members; equity considerations surrounding the distribution of group benefits and burdens; and the potential for meaningful partnerships between women's groups and local governments and/or non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to enhance community response amidst crises.
在低收入和中等收入国家,与妇女团体开展的干预措施越来越被视为促进妇女赋权、健康和经济成果的重要战略,有可能在诸如2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)等广泛的协变量冲击期间增强成员及其社区的复原力。本证据综述汇编了以往冲击对妇女团体活动的影响,以及妇女团体在多大程度上减轻冲击对成员和社区的影响的证据。我们查阅了学术数据库、组织报告和其他灰色文献中的90份文件,纳入了地理、妇女团体类型和冲击类型各异的文献。文献表明,协变量冲击往往会扰乱团体活动并减少团体资源,但与正规机构的联系可以通过将信贷扩展到受冲击影响的资源池之外来减轻这种影响。尽管研究结果因冲击严重程度、团体目的和结构以及结果衡量标准而异,但证据在很大程度上支持妇女团体为成员和社区提供复原力。此外,在冲击期间支持个人复原力的行动,如增加支付灵活性,可能与团体复原力背道而驰。证据综述的结果在很大程度上与南亚和撒哈拉以南非洲关于妇女团体和COVID-19的新证据一致。我们在论文结尾讨论了政策影响,包括妇女团体成员可持续获得财政资源的重要性;围绕团体利益和负担分配的公平考虑;以及妇女团体与地方政府和/或非政府组织(NGO)之间建立有意义的伙伴关系以增强危机期间社区应对能力的潜力。