Disaster and Development Centre, Northumbria University, UK.
Disasters. 2010 Jan;34(1):240-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01127.x.
This article explores the relationship between microcredit and vulnerability reduction for women-headed households in'multiple disasters'. Here multiple disasters are understood as disasters that occur in one specific place and cause severe devastation. The case study covers the super-cyclone in 1999, floods in 2001 and 2003, and drought in 2002 in Orissa, India. The study entailed eight months fieldwork and interviews with several governmental and non-governmental officials and 12 women-headed households from different social castes. The findings suggest that microcredit is a useful tool to replace women's livelihood assets that have been lost in multiple disasters. But inefficient microcredit delivery can cause microdebts and exacerbate caste, class and gender inequalities. It is posited that microcredit delivery cannot achieve vulnerability reduction for women in multiple disasters unless it is complemented by effective financial services, integrated policy planning and disaster management between government, non-governmental organisations and the community.
本文探讨了小额信贷与“多重灾害”中女性户主家庭脆弱性降低之间的关系。这里的“多重灾害”是指在一个特定地点发生并造成严重破坏的灾害。案例研究涵盖了印度奥里萨邦 1999 年的超级气旋、2001 年和 2003 年的洪水以及 2002 年的干旱。该研究历时 8 个月,对几名政府和非政府官员以及 12 名来自不同社会种姓的女性户主家庭进行了采访。研究结果表明,小额信贷是一个有用的工具,可以替代在多重灾害中失去的女性生计资产。但小额信贷的低效发放可能会导致小额债务,并加剧种姓、阶级和性别不平等。本文认为,除非小额信贷发放得到有效的金融服务、政府、非政府组织和社区之间的综合政策规划和灾害管理的补充,否则小额信贷的发放无法实现多重灾害中女性的脆弱性降低。