Naranjo Mario, Rosenzweig Erika B, Hemnes Anna R, Jacob Miriam, Desai Ankit, Hill Nicholas S, Larive A Brett, Finet J Emanuel, Leopold Jane, Horn Evelyn, Frantz Robert, Rischard Franz, Erzurum Serpil, Beck Gerald, Mathai Stephen C, Hassoun Paul M
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland USA.
Department of Pediatrics and Medicine Columbia University New York New York USA.
Pulm Circ. 2023 Aug 21;13(3):e12281. doi: 10.1002/pul2.12281. eCollection 2023 Jul.
The prevalence of acute vasodilator response (AVR) to inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) during right heart catheterization (RHC) is 12% in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH). AVR, however, is reportedly lower in other disease-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), such as connective tissue disease (CTD). The prevalence of AVR in patients on PAH therapy (prevalent cases) is unknown. We sought to determine AVR prevalence in Group 1 PH in the PVDOMICS cohort of incident and prevalent patients undergoing RHC. AVR was measured in response to 100% O and O plus iNO, with positivity defined as (1) decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) by ≥10 mmHg to a value ≤40 mmHg, with no change or an increase in cardiac output (definition 1); or (2) decrease in mPAP by ≥12% and pulmonary vascular resistance by ≥30% (definition 2). AVR rates and cumulative survival were compared between incident and prevalent patients. In 338 mainly prevalent (86%) patients, positive AVR to O-only was <2%, and 5.1% to 16.9%, based on definition 1 and 2 criteria, respectively; following O + iNO. IPAH AVR prevalence (4.1%-18.7%) was similar to prior reports. AVR positivity was 7.7% to 15.4% in mostly CTD-PAH prevalent cases, and 2.6% to 11.8% in other PAH groups. Survival was 89% in AVR responders versus 77% in nonresponders from PAH diagnosis, and 91% versus 86% from PVDOMICS enrollment (log-rank test = 0.04 and = 0.05, respectively). In conclusion, AVR in IPAH patients is similar to prior studies. AVR in non-IPAH patients was higher than previously reported. The relationship between PAH therapy, AVR response, and survival warrants further investigation.
在特发性肺动脉高压(IPAH)患者中,右心导管检查(RHC)期间对吸入一氧化氮(iNO)的急性血管扩张反应(AVR)发生率为12%。然而,据报道,在其他疾病相关的肺动脉高压(PAH)中,如结缔组织病(CTD),AVR发生率较低。接受PAH治疗的患者(现患病例)中AVR的发生率尚不清楚。我们试图确定在接受RHC的新发和现患患者的PVDOMICS队列中1组肺动脉高压(PH)患者的AVR发生率。测量对100%氧气和氧气加iNO的反应时的AVR,阳性定义为:(1)平均肺动脉压(mPAP)降低≥10 mmHg至≤40 mmHg,心输出量无变化或增加(定义1);或(2)mPAP降低≥12%且肺血管阻力降低≥30%(定义2)。比较新发和现患患者的AVR发生率和累积生存率。在338例主要为现患(86%)的患者中,仅对氧气的阳性AVR,根据定义1和2标准分别为<2%和5.1%至16.9%;在氧气+iNO之后。IPAH的AVR发生率(4.1% - 18.7%)与先前报道相似。在主要为CTD - PAH的现患病例中,AVR阳性率为7.7%至15.4%,在其他PAH组中为2.6%至11.8%。从PAH诊断起算,AVR反应者的生存率为89%,无反应者为77%;从PVDOMICS登记起算,分别为91%和86%(对数秩检验分别为=0.04和=0.05)。总之,IPAH患者的AVR与先前研究相似。非IPAH患者的AVR高于先前报道。PAH治疗、AVR反应和生存率之间的关系值得进一步研究。