Sung Valerie, Ching Teresa Y C, Smith Libby, Marnane Vivienne, Saetre-Turner Michelle, King Alison, Beswick Rachael, Iseli Claire E, Carew Peter
Prevention Innovation, Population Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Community Child Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Front Pediatr. 2023 Aug 8;11:1197739. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1197739. eCollection 2023.
Early identification of mild hearing loss has resulted in early hearing amplification without adequate evidence of effectiveness. This paper describes learnings from a pilot trial, combined with a qualitative study, to highlight the importance of community engagement in designing research studies to determine whether early amplification benefits young children with bilateral mild hearing loss.
PART 1 of the study is a proof-of-concept non-blinded multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of hearing device fitting vs. no fitting aimed to gather preliminary data and determine its acceptability/feasibility in children <2 years old with bilateral mild hearing loss.
PART 2 is a qualitative study to understand the barriers/enablers to RCT participation. Of 40 potentially eligible families, nine (23%) declined, three were uncontactable (7%), 26 (65%) ineligible: of these, nine (35%) did not meet hearing threshold inclusion criteria, 11 (42%) were already fitted or had made decisions on fitting hearing device, two (7%) had conductive loss and four (16%) were ineligible for other reasons. Two of 11 (18%) eligible families were randomised. With the limited sample size, outcome measures were not compared between groups. Both participants completed the trial, reported the RCT to be acceptable, and neither changed group post-enrolment.
Whilst recruitment uptake could potentially be increased by altering the eligibility criteria, better communication with and reimbursement of clinicians as recruiters, and improving awareness of the study amongst external stakeholders, the RCT methodology does not conform to family-centred practice, and potentially raises ethical concerns regarding potential adverse consequences of not offering early amplification. Parental perception of losing control over choice of management due to randomisation is not an easily modifiable factor. Alternative methodological approaches without randomisation are required to determine whether hearing amplification benefits infants with mild hearing loss. identifier [ACTRN12618001608257].
早期发现轻度听力损失导致了早期听力放大,但却没有充分的有效性证据。本文描述了一项试点试验及一项定性研究的经验教训,以强调社区参与在设计研究以确定早期放大是否有益于双侧轻度听力损失幼儿方面的重要性。
该研究的第一部分是一项概念验证性非盲多中心随机对照试验(RCT),比较听力设备佩戴与不佩戴,旨在收集初步数据并确定其在2岁以下双侧轻度听力损失儿童中的可接受性/可行性。
第二部分是一项定性研究,以了解参与RCT的障碍/促进因素。在40个潜在符合条件的家庭中,9个(23%)拒绝参与,3个无法联系到(7%),26个(65%)不符合条件:其中,9个(35%)未达到听力阈值纳入标准,11个(42%)已经佩戴或已就佩戴听力设备做出决定,2个(7%)患有传导性听力损失,4个(16%)因其他原因不符合条件。11个符合条件的家庭中有2个(18%)被随机分组。由于样本量有限,未对两组的结果指标进行比较。两名参与者均完成了试验,报告称RCT是可接受的,且入组后均未改变分组。
虽然通过改变纳入标准、更好地与作为招募者的临床医生沟通并给予补偿以及提高外部利益相关者对该研究的认识,可能会增加招募人数,但RCT方法不符合以家庭为中心的做法,并且可能引发关于不提供早期放大的潜在不良后果的伦理问题。家长因随机分组而感到失去对管理选择的控制权这一观念并非易于改变的因素。需要采用非随机化的替代方法来确定听力放大是否有益于轻度听力损失婴儿。标识符[ACTRN12618001608257]