Wüthrich B, Arrendal H
Clin Allergy. 1979 Mar;9(2):191-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1979.tb01541.x.
A comparison was made of clinical signs and provocation tests with the RAST for allergy to dog in eight and cat in twenty patients. Twenty-two had high IgE levels and all gave positive reactions to provocation tests. A commercially available dog epithelium extract gave more positive RASTs than five other dog allergen preparations, and there were no positive reactions to dog serum. The RAST was negative in patients with a low degree of sensitivity. All twenty patients allergic to cat gave positive intracutaneous test reactions and in the RAST the cat epithelial allergen showed 90% agreement with the in vivo findings.
对8名对狗过敏和20名对猫过敏患者的临床症状、激发试验与放射性变应原吸附试验(RAST)进行了比较。22名患者IgE水平较高,且对激发试验均呈阳性反应。一种市售的狗上皮提取物比其他五种狗过敏原制剂产生更多阳性RAST结果,且对狗血清无阳性反应。敏感性较低的患者RAST结果为阴性。所有20名对猫过敏的患者皮内试验反应均为阳性,在RAST中,猫上皮过敏原与体内试验结果的符合率为90%。