• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国乳腺外科医师学会保乳整形术分类系统可独立预测延迟性伤口愈合风险。

The American Society of Breast Surgeons classification system for oncoplastic breast conserving surgery independently predicts the risk of delayed wound healing.

机构信息

Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4001, Basel, Switzerland.

University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4001, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;49(10):107032. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107032. Epub 2023 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107032
PMID:37619374
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OBCS) aims to provide safe and satisfying surgery for breast cancer patients. The American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) classification system is based on volumetric displacement cut-offs (level I for <20% of breast volume; level II for 20-50%). It aims to facilitate communication among treating physicians and patients. Here, we investigate whether the extent of OBCS as classified by ASBrS independently predicts postoperative complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database included patients with stage I-III breast cancer who underwent OBCS between 03/2011 and 12/2020 at a Swiss university hospital. Outcomes included short-term (≤30 days) complications and chronic (>30 days) pain after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors.

RESULTS

In total, 439 patients were included, 314 (71.5%) received ASBrS level I surgery, and 125 (28.5%) underwent ASBrS level II surgery. ASBrS level II was found to be an independent predictor of delayed wound healing (odds ratio [OR] 9.75, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.96-32.10). However, ASBrS level did not predict chronic postoperative pain (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.20, 95%CI 0.85-1.70), as opposed to age (IRR 1.19, 95%CI 1.11-1.27 per 5 years decrease), and weight disorders (underweight [BMI <18.5] vs. normal weight [BMI 18.5 < 25]: IRR 4.02, 95%CI 1.70-9.54; obese [BMI ≥30] vs. normal weight: IRR 2.07, 95%CI 1.37-3.13).

CONCLUSION

ASBrS level II surgery predicted delayed wound healing, warranting close clinical follow-up and prompt treatment to avoid delays in adjuvant therapy.

摘要

介绍

肿瘤整形保乳术(OBCS)旨在为乳腺癌患者提供安全且满意的手术。美国乳腺外科学会(ASBrS)分类系统基于体积位移截断值(I 级<20%的乳房体积;II 级为 20-50%)。其目的是促进治疗医生和患者之间的沟通。在这里,我们研究 ASBrS 分类的 OBCS 范围是否独立预测术后并发症。

材料和方法

本研究回顾性分析了 2011 年 3 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在瑞士一家大学医院接受 OBCS 的 I-III 期乳腺癌患者的前瞻性维护数据库。结果包括短期(≤30 天)并发症和术后慢性(>30 天)疼痛。使用多变量逻辑回归模型确定独立预测因子。

结果

共纳入 439 例患者,其中 314 例(71.5%)接受 ASBrS Ⅰ级手术,125 例(28.5%)接受 ASBrS Ⅱ级手术。ASBrS Ⅱ级被发现是延迟伤口愈合的独立预测因子(优势比 [OR] 9.75,95%置信区间 [CI] 2.96-32.10)。然而,ASBrS 分级并不能预测慢性术后疼痛(发病率比 [IRR] 1.20,95%CI 0.85-1.70),而年龄(每减少 5 岁增加 1.19,95%CI 1.11-1.27)和体重障碍(体重过轻 [BMI <18.5] 与正常体重 [BMI 18.5 <25]:IRR 4.02,95%CI 1.70-9.54;肥胖 [BMI ≥30] 与正常体重:IRR 2.07,95%CI 1.37-3.13)。

结论

ASBrS Ⅱ级手术预测延迟伤口愈合,需要密切临床随访和及时治疗,以避免辅助治疗延迟。

相似文献

1
The American Society of Breast Surgeons classification system for oncoplastic breast conserving surgery independently predicts the risk of delayed wound healing.美国乳腺外科医师学会保乳整形术分类系统可独立预测延迟性伤口愈合风险。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;49(10):107032. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107032. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
2
Association of relative resection volume with patient-reported outcomes applying different levels of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery - A retrospective cohort study.相对切除体积与应用不同水平肿瘤整形保乳术的患者报告结局的相关性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep;50(9):108478. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108478. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
3
A Consensus Definition and Classification System of Oncoplastic Surgery Developed by the American Society of Breast Surgeons.美国乳腺外科学会制定的肿瘤整形手术共识定义和分类系统。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(11):3436-3444. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07345-4. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
4
The impact of delayed wound healing on patient-reported outcomes after breast cancer surgery.乳腺癌手术后伤口愈合延迟对患者报告结局的影响。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Nov;75(11):4125-4132. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.06.106. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
5
Outcomes of Volume Replacement Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Using Chest Wall Perforator Flaps: Comparison with Volume Displacement Oncoplastic Surgery and Total Breast Reconstruction.应用胸壁穿支皮瓣进行容积置换保乳整形术的疗效:与容积移位保乳整形术和全乳重建术的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jul;146(1):14-27. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006911.
6
Comparison of clinicopathologic, cosmetic and quality of life outcomes in 700 oncoplastic and conventional breast-conserving surgery cases: A single-centre retrospective study.700 例保乳手术中肿瘤整形与传统保乳手术的临床病理、美容和生活质量结局比较:单中心回顾性研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;45(2):118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
7
Outcomes in volume replacement and volume displacement techniques in oncoplastic breast conserving surgery: A systematic review.在肿瘤整形保乳术中,容量置换和容量移位技术的结果:系统评价。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Nov;74(11):2846-2855. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
8
The impact of age on patient-reported outcomes after oncoplastic versus conventional breast cancer surgery.年龄对肿瘤整形与传统乳腺癌手术后患者报告结局的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jun;187(2):437-446. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06126-6. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
9
Comparison of surgical and oncological outcomes between oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery versus conventional breast-conserving surgery for treatment of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 31 studies.对比保乳术与传统保乳术治疗乳腺癌的手术和肿瘤学结局:31 项研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun;42:101779. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101779. Epub 2022 May 10.
10
Simultaneous Symmetry Procedure in Patients Undergoing Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery: An Evaluation of Patient Desire and Revision Rates.保乳手术同期乳房整形术:患者意愿及返修率评估。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(10):6135-6139. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13893-7. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Outcomes in Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery.优化肿瘤整形保乳手术的治疗效果
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 7;14(13):4806. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134806.
2
Oncoplastic surgery in the USA: a review of where we started, where we are today and where we are headed.美国的肿瘤整形手术:回顾我们的起点、现状及未来走向。
Gland Surg. 2024 May 30;13(5):749-759. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-363. Epub 2024 May 16.
3
Evolution of breast conserving surgery-current implementation of oncoplastic techniques in breast conserving surgery: a literature review.
保乳手术的进展——保乳手术中肿瘤整形技术的当前应用:文献综述
Gland Surg. 2024 Mar 27;13(3):412-425. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-454. Epub 2024 Mar 14.