• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕产妇发病情况对剖宫产率的影响:利用罗布森十组分类系统探索拉丁美洲哨点医疗机构网络

The impact of maternal morbidity on cesarean section rates: exploring a Latin American network of sentinel facilities using the Robson's Ten Group Classification System.

作者信息

Sosa Claudio, de Mucio Bremen, Colomar Mercedes, Mainero Luis, Costa Maria L, Guida Jose P, Souza Renato T, Luz Adriana G, Cecatti José G, Sousa Maria H, Cruz Carmen M, Chevez Luz M, Lopez Rita, Carrillo Gema, Rizo Ulises, Saint Hillaire Erika E, Arriaga William E, Guadalupe Rosa M, Ochoa Carlos, Gonzalez Freddy, Castro Rigoberto, Stefan Allan, Moreno Amanda, Serruya Suzanne J

机构信息

Latin American Center of Perinatology, Women and Reproductive Health (CLAP/WR), Montevideo, Uruguay.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Aug 24;23(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05937-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-023-05937-3
PMID:37620835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10464484/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Latin America has the highest Cesarean Section Rates (CSR) in the world. Robson's Ten Group Classification System (RTGCS) was developed to enable understanding the CSR in different groups of women, classified according to obstetric characteristics into one of ten groups. The size of each CS group may provide helpful data on quality of care in a determined region or setting. Data can potentially be used to compare the impact of conditions such as maternal morbidity on CSR. The objective of this study is to understand the impact of Severe Maternal Morbidity (SMM) on CSR in ten different groups of RTGCS.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of childbirth information from 2018 to 2021, including 8 health facilities from 5 Latin American and Caribbean countries (Bolivia, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and the Dominican Republic), using a surveillance database (SIP-Perinatal Information System, in Spanish) implemented in different settings across Latin America. Women were classified into one of RTGCS. The frequency of each group and its respective CSR were described. Furthermore, the sample was divided into two groups, according to maternal outcomes: women without SMM and those who experienced SMM, considering Potentially Life-threatening Conditions, Maternal Near Miss and Maternal Death as the continuum of morbidity.

RESULTS

Available data were obtained from 92,688 deliveries using the Robson Classification. Overall CSR was around 38%. Group 5 was responsible for almost one-third of cesarean sections. SMM occurred in 6.7% of cases. Among these cases, the overall CSR was almost 70% in this group. Group 10 had a major role (preterm deliveries). Group 5 (previous Cesarean section) had a very high CSR within the group, regardless of the occurrence of maternal morbidity (over 80%).

CONCLUSION

Cesarean section rate was higher in women experiencing SMM than in those without SMM in Latin America. SMM was associated with higher Cesarean section rates, especially in groups 1 and 3. Nevertheless, group 5 was the major contributor to the overall CSR.

摘要

背景

拉丁美洲的剖宫产率(CSR)是全球最高的。罗布森十组分类系统(RTGCS)的开发是为了便于理解不同女性群体的剖宫产率,这些女性群体根据产科特征被分为十组中的一组。每个剖宫产组的规模可能会提供有关特定地区或环境中医疗质量的有用数据。这些数据有可能用于比较诸如孕产妇发病率等情况对剖宫产率的影响。本研究的目的是了解严重孕产妇发病率(SMM)对RTGCS十个不同组中剖宫产率的影响。

方法

对2018年至2021年的分娩信息进行二次分析,数据来自拉丁美洲和加勒比地区5个国家(玻利维亚、危地马拉、洪都拉斯、尼加拉瓜和多米尼加共和国)的8家医疗机构,使用在拉丁美洲不同地区实施的监测数据库(西班牙语的围产期信息系统SIP)。女性被分为RTGCS中的一组。描述了每组的频率及其各自的剖宫产率。此外,根据孕产妇结局将样本分为两组:无严重孕产妇发病率的女性和经历严重孕产妇发病率的女性,将潜在危及生命的情况、孕产妇接近死亡和孕产妇死亡视为发病的连续体。

结果

使用罗布森分类法从92,688例分娩中获得了可用数据。总体剖宫产率约为38%。第5组占剖宫产总数的近三分之一。6.7%的病例发生了严重孕产妇发病率。在这些病例中,该组的总体剖宫产率几乎为70%。第10组起主要作用(早产)。第5组(既往剖宫产史)在组内的剖宫产率非常高,无论是否发生孕产妇发病率(超过80%)。

结论

在拉丁美洲,经历严重孕产妇发病率的女性的剖宫产率高于未经历严重孕产妇发病率的女性。严重孕产妇发病率与较高的剖宫产率相关,尤其是在第1组和第3组。然而,第5组是总体剖宫产率的主要贡献者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93a5/10464484/686b70684054/12884_2023_5937_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93a5/10464484/686b70684054/12884_2023_5937_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93a5/10464484/686b70684054/12884_2023_5937_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of maternal morbidity on cesarean section rates: exploring a Latin American network of sentinel facilities using the Robson's Ten Group Classification System.孕产妇发病情况对剖宫产率的影响:利用罗布森十组分类系统探索拉丁美洲哨点医疗机构网络
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Aug 24;23(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05937-3.
2
Examining Cesarean Delivery Rates Using the Robson's Ten-group Classification.使用罗布森十组分类法检查剖宫产率
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Oct;66(Suppl 1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0738-1. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
3
Analysis of cesarean section rates and its indications using robson's classification at a tertiary care hospital, Manipur.在曼尼普尔邦的一家三级护理医院,使用罗布森分类法分析剖宫产率及其指征。
Indian J Public Health. 2022 Oct-Dec;66(4):434-438. doi: 10.4103/ijph.ijph_1928_21.
4
Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson's Ten Group Classification System.使用罗布森十组分类系统对剖宫产进行分析。
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Mar-Apr;37(2):567-571. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823.
5
Robson's Ten Group Classification System to Evaluate Cesarean Section Rates in Honduras: The Relevance of Labor Induction.罗伯逊的十组分类系统评估洪都拉斯的剖宫产率:引产的相关性。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Sep;44(9):830-837. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1753547. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
6
[Obstetric care and severe pregnancy complications in Latin America and the Caribbean: an analysis of information from demographic health surveys].[拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的产科护理与严重妊娠并发症:基于人口健康调查信息的分析]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2007 Jun;21(6):396-401. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892007000500008.
7
Analysis Of Caesarean Sections Rates Using Robson's Ten Group Classification System, Unit B Mchc, Ath Abbottabad.使用罗伯逊的 10 组分类系统对 B 区产科病房(阿塔巴德)剖宫产率进行分析。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2022 Jul-Sep;34(3):537-539. doi: 10.55519/JAMC-03-10986.
8
Achievement of appropriate cesarean rates using Robson's 10-Group classification system in Brazilian private practice.采用罗伯逊的 10 分组分类系统在巴西私人执业中实现适当的剖宫产率。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jul 10;23(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05803-2.
9
The Robson ten-group classification system for appraising deliveries at a tertiary referral hospital in Brazil.巴西一家三级转诊医院用于评估分娩情况的罗布森十组分类系统。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;129(3):236-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.026. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
10
Midwifery practice and maternity services: A multisite descriptive study in Latin America and the Caribbean.助产实践与孕产妇服务:拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的多地点描述性研究。
Midwifery. 2016 Sep;40:218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of laparotomy-assisted fetoscopic spina bifida repair in two centers in Latin America: rationale for this approach in this region.拉丁美洲两个中心开展剖腹术辅助胎儿脊柱裂修复手术:该地区采用此方法的基本原理。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 Jan 16;5(1):100442. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100442. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Cesarean section in Suriname using robson classification: a two-year nationwide cross-sectional study on rates, risk factors and perinatal outcomes of cesarean section.苏里南剖宫产的罗布森分类法:一项关于剖宫产率、危险因素及围产期结局的为期两年的全国性横断面研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07009-6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cesarean Delivery Uptake Trends Associated With Patient Features and Threshold for Labor Anomalies.剖宫产分娩率上升趋势与患者特征及产程异常阈值的关系
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e235436. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.5436.
2
Cesarean section in Uruguay from 2008 to 2018: country analysis based on the Robson classification. An observational study.2008 年至 2018 年乌拉圭的剖宫产术:基于 Robson 分类的国家分析。一项观察性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jun 7;22(1):471. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04792-y.
3
The Prevalence and Risk Factors for Severe Maternal Morbidities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Optimizing caesarean section use and feasibility of implementing the Robson classification system: Perspectives of healthcare providers and policymakers.
优化剖宫产的使用及实施罗布森分类系统的可行性:医疗服务提供者和政策制定者的观点
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Mar 25;12:20503121241237447. doi: 10.1177/20503121241237447. eCollection 2024.
4
Do we still need to talk about maternal morbidity and near miss?我们还需要讨论孕产妇发病和接近死亡情况吗?
Cad Saude Publica. 2023 Nov 13;39(11):e00185223. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT185223. eCollection 2023.
严重孕产妇发病的患病率及危险因素:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 17;9:861028. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.861028. eCollection 2022.
4
Using the Robson classification to assess caesarean section rates in Brazil: an observational study of more than 24 million births from 2011 to 2017.利用 Robson 分类评估巴西的剖宫产率:2011 年至 2017 年超过 2400 万例分娩的观察性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Aug 30;21(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04060-5.
5
Can pre-eclampsia explain higher cesarean rates in the different groups of Robson's classification?前置胎盘能否解释罗伯逊分类不同组别的剖宫产率更高?
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;152(3):339-344. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13370. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
6
Cesarean rates in a Chilean public hospital and the use of a new prioritization criteria: The relevance index.智利一家公立医院的剖宫产率及一种新的优先排序标准的应用:相关性指数
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Mar;45(3):578-584. doi: 10.1111/jog.13879. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
7
Exploring the Concept of Degrees of Maternal Morbidity as a Tool for Surveillance of Maternal Health in Latin American and Caribbean Settings.探讨将产妇发病程度用作拉丁美洲和加勒比地区产妇健康监测工具的概念。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8271042. doi: 10.1155/2017/8271042. Epub 2017 Oct 22.
8
What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies.在人群层面,剖宫产的最佳比率是多少?生态学研究的系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2015 Jun 21;12:57. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0043-6.
9
Robson Ten Group Classification System applied to women with severe maternal morbidity.应用于严重孕产妇发病妇女的罗布森十组分类系统。
Birth. 2015 Mar;42(1):38-47. doi: 10.1111/birt.12155.
10
The Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) - a common starting point for more detailed analysis.十组分类系统(TGCS)——更详细分析的共同起点。
BJOG. 2015 Apr;122(5):701. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13267. Epub 2015 Jan 20.