• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西一家三级转诊医院用于评估分娩情况的罗布森十组分类系统。

The Robson ten-group classification system for appraising deliveries at a tertiary referral hospital in Brazil.

作者信息

Ferreira Elton C, Pacagnella Rodolfo C, Costa Maria L, Cecatti Jose G

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;129(3):236-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.026. Epub 2015 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.026
PMID:25704253
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the distribution of women according to the Robson 10-group classification system (RTGCS) and the occurrence of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) by mode of delivery at a tertiary referral hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted of all women admitted to the Women's Hospital at the University of Campinas (Campinas, Brazil) for delivery between January 2009 and July 2013. Women were grouped according to RTGCS. Mode of delivery and SMM (defined as need for admission to the intensive care unit) were assessed.

RESULTS

Among 12 771 women, 5957 (46.6%) delivered by cesarean. Overall, 3594 (28.1%) women were in group 1 (nulliparous, single pregnancy, cephalic, term, spontaneous labor), 2328 (18.2%) in group 5 (≥1 previous cesarean, single pregnancy, cephalic, term), and 2112 (16.5%) in group 3 (multiparous excluding previous cesarean, single pregnancy, cephalic, term, spontaneous labor). Group 5 contributed the most cesarean deliveries (1626 [27.3%]), followed by group 2 (nulliparous, single pregnancy, cephalic, term, induced labor or cesarean before labor; 1049 [17.6%]). SMM was more common among women undergoing cesarean delivery than among those delivering vaginally in groups 1-5.

CONCLUSION

The RTGCS allowed the identification of groups with the highest frequency of cesarean delivery and an assessment of SMM. This should be considered in related health policies.

摘要

目的

根据罗布森10组分类系统(RTGCS)评估三级转诊医院中按分娩方式划分的女性分布情况以及严重孕产妇发病(SMM)的发生率。

方法

对2009年1月至2013年7月间入住坎皮纳斯大学妇女医院(巴西坎皮纳斯)分娩的所有女性进行回顾性横断面研究。根据RTGCS对女性进行分组。评估分娩方式和SMM(定义为需要入住重症监护病房)。

结果

在12771名女性中,5957名(46.6%)通过剖宫产分娩。总体而言,3594名(28.1%)女性属于第1组(初产妇,单胎妊娠,头位,足月,自然分娩),2328名(18.2%)属于第5组(既往有≥1次剖宫产史,单胎妊娠,头位,足月),2112名(16.5%)属于第3组(经产妇,不包括既往剖宫产史,单胎妊娠,头位,足月,自然分娩)。第5组剖宫产分娩最多(1626例[27.3%]),其次是第2组(初产妇,单胎妊娠,头位,足月,引产或临产前剖宫产;1049例[17.6%])。在第1 - 5组中,SMM在剖宫产分娩的女性中比经阴道分娩的女性更常见。

结论

RTGCS有助于识别剖宫产分娩频率最高的组并评估SMM。在相关卫生政策中应予以考虑。

相似文献

1
The Robson ten-group classification system for appraising deliveries at a tertiary referral hospital in Brazil.巴西一家三级转诊医院用于评估分娩情况的罗布森十组分类系统。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;129(3):236-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.026. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
2
[Ratio of transfer cesarean section after trial of labor and maternal-fetal adverse outcomes based on Robson classifications].[基于罗布森分类法的试产后剖宫产率与母胎不良结局]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 25;54(8):512-515. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.08.002.
3
Robson Ten Group Classification System applied to women with severe maternal morbidity.应用于严重孕产妇发病妇女的罗布森十组分类系统。
Birth. 2015 Mar;42(1):38-47. doi: 10.1111/birt.12155.
4
Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital.在一家三级医院使用罗布森十组分类法确定降低剖宫产率的产科目标。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Jun;189:91-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.030. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
5
Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital.三级教学医院中按罗伯逊十组分类的剖宫产分娩变化趋势。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Dec;91(12):1422-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01529.x. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
6
Mode of delivery and outcomes by birth weight among spontaneous and induced singleton cephalic nulliparous labors.自然分娩与引产的单胎头位初产妇分娩方式及出生体重与结局的关系
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Apr;129(1):22-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.10.029. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
7
Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth.使用罗布森分类法评估巴西的剖宫产率:分娩支付来源的作用。
Reprod Health. 2016 Oct 17;13(Suppl 3):128. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0228-7.
8
Evaluation of cesarean delivery rates at three university hospital labor units using the Robson classification system.应用罗伯逊分类系统评价 3 所大学附属医院产房的剖宫产率。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Jul;146(1):118-125. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12842. Epub 2019 May 21.
9
Cesarean delivery in the United States 2005 through 2014: a population-based analysis using the Robson 10-Group Classification System.2005 年至 2014 年美国的剖宫产术:使用 Robson 10 组分类系统的基于人群的分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;219(1):105.e1-105.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
10
Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term.与足月自然发动分娩相比,未临产剖宫产相关的孕产妇发病率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;102(3):477-82. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00570-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cesarean delivery in a tertiary institution of the Republic of Moldova: analysis using the Robson classification.摩尔多瓦共和国一家三级医疗机构的剖宫产情况:采用罗布森分类法进行分析
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Oct 5;4(4):100408. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100408. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Cesarean sections in Brazil's teaching hospitals: an analysis using Robson Classification.巴西教学医院的剖宫产手术:一项使用罗布森分类法的分析
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 Feb 26;45:e16. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2021.16. eCollection 2021.
3
Gestational Risk as a Determining Factor for Cesarean Section according to the Robson Classification Groups.
根据罗伯逊分类法,妊娠风险是剖宫产的决定因素。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021 Feb;43(2):84-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718446. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
4
Improving the Management of High-Risk Pregnancies with the Use of the Robson Classification.利用罗伯逊分类法改善高危妊娠管理。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020 Aug;42(8):448-453. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713910. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
5
A Brazilian multicentre study evaluating pregnancies induced by cabergoline in patients harboring prolactinomas.一项评估卡麦角林诱导泌乳素瘤患者妊娠的巴西多中心研究。
Pituitary. 2020 Apr;23(2):120-128. doi: 10.1007/s11102-019-01008-z.
6
Monitoring caesarean births using the Robson ten group classification system: A cross-sectional survey of private for-profit facilities in urban Bangladesh.使用 Robson 十组分类系统监测剖宫产分娩:孟加拉国城市私立营利性医疗机构的横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 8;14(8):e0220693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220693. eCollection 2019.
7
Pregnancy outcomes of women with previous caesarean sections: Secondary analysis of World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health.有剖宫产史的妇女的妊娠结局:世界卫生组织母婴健康多国调查的二次分析。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 5;9(1):9748. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46153-4.