• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Surgical Outcomes of Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy at a Hospital in a Sparsely Populated Area.人口稀少地区一家医院机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的手术结果
Yonago Acta Med. 2023 Aug 12;66(3):375-379. doi: 10.33160/yam.2023.08.010. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
A comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single surgeon's robotic experience in a high-volume center.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:高容量中心单外科医生的机器人手术经验。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9186-9193. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09402-8. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
3
ROBOTIC ASSISTED VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下远端胰腺切除术:一项回顾性研究。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2023 Dec 8;36:e1783. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020230065e1783. eCollection 2023.
4
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术:法国单中心前瞻性经验及成本效益分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3562-3569. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6080-9. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
5
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: multicentre analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:多中心分析。
Br J Surg. 2021 Mar 12;108(2):188-195. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa039.
6
[Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective single-center study].[机器人辅助与腹腔镜下远端胰腺切除术:一项回顾性单中心研究]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 1;57(2):102-107. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2019.02.006.
7
Postoperative outcomes and costs of laparoscopic versus robotic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity-matched analysis.腹腔镜与机器人辅助胰体尾切除术的术后结果和费用:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2095-2105. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10728-8. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
8
Which method of distal pancreatectomy is cost-effective among open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery?在开放手术、腹腔镜手术或机器人手术中,哪种远端胰腺切除术方法具有成本效益?
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2018 Oct;7(5):345-352. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2018.09.03.
9
Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: a case-matched cost-analysis between robot-assisted surgery and direct manual laparoscopy.微创远端胰腺切除术:机器人辅助手术与直接手动腹腔镜手术的病例匹配成本分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):651-662. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08332-1. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
10
Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: Laparoscopic versus robotic approach-A cohort study.微创远端胰腺切除术:腹腔镜与机器人手术入路——一项队列研究
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 4;5(4):e712. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.712. eCollection 2022 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Use and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery in the European E-MIPS registry.在欧洲 E-MIPS 注册中心使用微创胰腺手术的情况和结果。
HPB (Oxford). 2023 Apr;25(4):400-408. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.07.015. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
2
Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: An International, Retrospective, Cohort Study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下胰体尾切除术治疗可切除胰腺癌患者的国际回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 May;30(5):3023-3032. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-13054-2. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
3
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis including patient subgroups.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:一项包括患者亚组的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4131-4143. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09894-y. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
4
Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy: A Novel Standard of Care? Benchmark Values for Surgical Outcomes From 16 International Expert Centers.机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术:一种新的护理标准?来自16个国际专家中心的手术结果基准值。
Ann Surg. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):253-259. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005601. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
5
A comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single surgeon's robotic experience in a high-volume center.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:高容量中心单外科医生的机器人手术经验。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9186-9193. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09402-8. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
6
The current status and future directions of robotic pancreatectomy.机器人胰腺切除术的现状与未来方向
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021 Mar 4;5(4):467-476. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12446. eCollection 2021 Jul.
7
Robotic distal pancreatectomy reduces pancreatic fistula in patients without visceral obesity as compared to open distal pancreatectomy: A propensity score matching retrospective cohort study.机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术与开腹远端胰腺切除术相比,可减少非肥胖型内脏患者的胰瘘:一项倾向评分匹配回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2021 Jun;90:105960. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105960. Epub 2021 May 12.
8
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: multicentre analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:多中心分析。
Br J Surg. 2021 Mar 12;108(2):188-195. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa039.
9
The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After.国际研究小组(ISGPS)术后胰瘘定义与分级的2016年更新:11年后
Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
10
A comparison between robotic-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的比较。
Int J Med Robot. 2017 Mar;13(1). doi: 10.1002/rcs.1733. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

人口稀少地区一家医院机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的手术结果

Surgical Outcomes of Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Versus Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy at a Hospital in a Sparsely Populated Area.

作者信息

Sakamoto Teruhisa, Kishino Mikiya, Murakami Yuki, Miyatani Kozo, Shishido Yuji, Hanaki Takehiko, Matsunaga Tomoyuki, Yamamoto Manabu, Tokuyasu Naruo, Fujiwara Yoshiyuki

机构信息

Division of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago 683-8504, Japan.

出版信息

Yonago Acta Med. 2023 Aug 12;66(3):375-379. doi: 10.33160/yam.2023.08.010. eCollection 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.33160/yam.2023.08.010
PMID:37621978
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10444586/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) has a better or comparable surgical outcome when compared with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). However, whether the surgical outcome for these procedures in local, low-volume hospitals are comparable with those of the typically larger centers described in published reports remains unclear.

METHODS

This study enrolled 48 patients who underwent either RDP or LDP between August 2012 and April 2023. Data were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the short-term surgical outcomes of RDP versus LDP in our hospital, which is a low-volume center.

RESULTS

The use of stapling with reinforcement in RDP was significantly higher than in LDP, and the postoperative hospital stay for RDP was significantly shorter than for LDP. Except for these two variables, there were no statistically significant differences between RDP and LDP in preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative patient characteristics.

CONCLUSION

RDP can be performed as safely and effectively as LDP in a low-volume hospital located in a sparsely populated area.

摘要

背景

与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术(LDP)相比,机器人远端胰腺切除术(RDP)具有更好或相当的手术效果。然而,在当地的小容量医院进行这些手术的结果是否与已发表报告中描述的典型大型中心的结果相当仍不清楚。

方法

本研究纳入了2012年8月至2023年4月期间接受RDP或LDP手术的48例患者。对数据进行回顾性分析,以评估在我们这家小容量中心医院中RDP与LDP的短期手术结果。

结果

RDP中使用带加强的吻合器的比例显著高于LDP,且RDP的术后住院时间显著短于LDP。除这两个变量外,RDP和LDP在术前、术中和术后患者特征方面无统计学显著差异。

结论

在人口稀少地区的小容量医院中,RDP可以像LDP一样安全有效地进行。