• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦小肠梗阻患者管理的医院间差异。

Inter-hospital variation in management of patients with small bowel obstruction in Denmark.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge.

Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Diseases, Surgical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte Hospital.

出版信息

Dan Med J. 2023 Aug 16;70(9):A01230057.

PMID:37622641
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Inter-hospital variation in the management of small bowel obstruction (SBO) has been described in other countries, but the extent to which similar variations exist in Denmark remains unknown. This study aimed to compare the management of SBO between hospitals in Denmark and identify potential areas for improvement METHODS. This was a multicentre prospective study performed at six emergency hospitals. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of SBO were eligible for inclusion. The primary study endpoints were the proportion of patients undergoing operative versus non-operative management, laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery and the success rate of non-operative management.

RESULTS

A total of 316 patients were included. No differences were noted in diagnostic pathways or operative versus non-operative management. However, variations were noted in compliance with peri-operative care bundles, ranging from 63.2% to 95.8%. The surgical approach also varied, with the use of laparoscopic surgery ranging from 20.7% to 71.0% (p less-than 0.001). Variations were also noted in duration of surgery (63-124 minutes, p less-than 0.001), time to re-introduction of normal diet and length of hospital stay (3-8.5 days, p less-than 0.001). No differences were observed in 30-day or 90-day mortality rates.

CONCLUSION

The management of SBO in Denmark is relatively standardised. Future efforts should focus on improving adherence to multidisciplinary peri-operative protocols, optimising patient selection for laparoscopic surgery and standardising nutritional therapy.

FUNDING

None.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04750811.

摘要

简介

在其他国家已经描述了医院间在小肠梗阻(SBO)管理方面的差异,但丹麦是否存在类似的差异尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较丹麦各医院 SBO 的管理,并确定潜在的改进领域。

方法

这是一项在六家急诊医院进行的多中心前瞻性研究。年龄≥18 岁且诊断为 SBO 的患者符合纳入标准。主要研究终点是接受手术与非手术治疗、腹腔镜手术与开放手术以及非手术治疗成功率的患者比例。

结果

共纳入 316 例患者。在诊断途径或手术与非手术治疗方面未观察到差异。然而,在围手术期护理包的依从性方面存在差异,范围为 63.2%至 95.8%。手术方法也存在差异,腹腔镜手术的使用率为 20.7%至 71.0%(p<0.001)。手术持续时间(63-124 分钟,p<0.001)、正常饮食恢复时间和住院时间(3-8.5 天,p<0.001)也存在差异。30 天或 90 天死亡率无差异。

结论

丹麦 SBO 的管理相对标准化。未来的努力应侧重于提高多学科围手术期方案的依从性,优化腹腔镜手术患者选择,并规范营养治疗。

资助

无。

试验注册

NCT04750811。

相似文献

1
Inter-hospital variation in management of patients with small bowel obstruction in Denmark.丹麦小肠梗阻患者管理的医院间差异。
Dan Med J. 2023 Aug 16;70(9):A01230057.
2
Management and short-term outcomes of patients with small bowel obstruction in Denmark: a multicentre prospective cohort study.丹麦的小肠梗阻患者的管理和短期结局:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Apr;49(2):1121-1130. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02171-y. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
3
Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a comparison of outcomes.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗粘连性小肠梗阻:疗效比较
Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2525-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4015-7. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
4
One-year outcomes following operative or non-operative management of adhesional small bowel obstruction.粘连性小肠梗阻手术或非手术治疗后的 1 年结果。
BJS Open. 2023 Sep 5;7(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad103.
5
Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of small bowel obstruction: an analysis of clinical outcomes.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗小肠梗阻:临床结果分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4454-63. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4776-2. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
6
Laparotomy for small-bowel obstruction: first choice or last resort for adhesiolysis? A laparoscopic approach for small-bowel obstruction reduces 30-day complications.剖腹术治疗小肠梗阻:粘连松解的首选还是最后手段?腹腔镜治疗小肠梗阻可减少 30 天并发症。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3162-6. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
7
Laparoscopic Versus Open Bowel Resection in Emergency Small Bowel Obstruction: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.急诊小肠梗阻中腹腔镜与开腹肠切除术的比较:国家外科质量改进计划数据库分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Aug;25(8):625-30. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0446. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
8
Immediate postlaparotomy small bowel obstruction: a 16-year retrospective analysis.剖腹术后即刻小肠梗阻:一项16年的回顾性分析
Am Surg. 2002 Sep;68(9):780-2.
9
Acute small bowel obstruction: one-year retrospective study of admissions to inner city Royal Perth Hospital.急性小肠梗阻:对珀斯皇家医院市中心院区住院病例的一年回顾性研究
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Sep;90(9):1689-1693. doi: 10.1111/ans.16177. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
10
Decreased risk of surgery for small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery compared with open surgery: a nationwide cohort study.与开放手术相比,腹腔镜结肠癌手术后小肠梗阻手术风险降低:一项全国性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5572-5582. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4930-x. Epub 2016 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of patients admitted with malignant small bowel obstruction: a subgroup multicentre observational cohort analysis.以恶性小肠梗阻入院患者的结局:亚组多中心观察队列分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Aug 6;409(1):239. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03436-3.