Suppr超能文献

理解线下和线上肿瘤运动项目的实施:基于参与者观点的混合方法研究

Understanding In-Person and Online Exercise Oncology Programme Delivery: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Participant Perspectives.

机构信息

Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2023 Aug 3;30(8):7366-7383. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30080534.

Abstract

Alberta Cancer Exercise (ACE) is an exercise oncology programme that transitioned from in-person to online delivery during COVID-19. The purpose of this work was to understand participants' experiences in both delivery modes. Specifically, survivors' exercise facilitators and barriers, delivery mode preference, and experience with programme elements targeting behaviour change were gathered. A retrospective cohort design using explanatory sequential mixed methods was used. Briefly, 57 participants completed a survey, and 19 subsequent, optional interviews were conducted. Most participants indicated preferring in-person programmes (58%), followed by online (32%), and no preference (10%). There were significantly fewer barriers to (i.e., commute time) ( < 0.01), but also fewer facilitators of (i.e., social support) ( < 0.01), exercising using the online programme. Four themes were generated from the qualitative data surrounding participant experiences in both delivery modes. Key differences in barriers and facilitators highlighted a more convenient experience online relative to a more socially supportive environment in-person. For future work that includes solely online delivery, focusing on building social support and a sense of community will be critical to optimising programme benefits. Beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, results of this research will remain relevant as we aim to increase the reach of online exercise oncology programming to more underserved populations of individuals living with cancer.

摘要

艾伯塔癌症运动(ACE)是一个运动肿瘤学项目,在 COVID-19 期间从面对面模式转变为在线模式。这项工作的目的是了解参与者在两种交付模式下的体验。具体来说,收集了幸存者的运动促进因素和障碍、交付模式偏好,以及针对行为改变的项目要素的体验。采用解释性顺序混合方法的回顾性队列设计。简而言之,57 名参与者完成了一项调查,随后进行了 19 次可选访谈。大多数参与者表示更喜欢面对面的项目(58%),其次是在线项目(32%),没有偏好(10%)。使用在线项目锻炼的障碍明显减少(即通勤时间)(<0.01),但促进因素也较少(即社会支持)(<0.01)。从定性数据中生成了四个主题,这些主题围绕参与者在两种交付模式下的体验。在障碍和促进因素方面的关键差异表明,与面对面环境相比,在线模式的体验更加便利。对于未来仅包括在线交付的工作,专注于建立社会支持和社区意识对于优化项目效益至关重要。超越 COVID-19 大流行,本研究的结果仍然具有相关性,因为我们旨在增加在线运动肿瘤学项目的覆盖面,以惠及更多癌症患者的弱势群体。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验