Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia.
Curr Oncol. 2023 Aug 21;30(8):7777-7788. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30080564.
To evaluate the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spine metastases and the associated factors in Australia. The Victorian Radiotherapy Minimum Dataset, which captures all episodes of radiotherapy delivered in the state of Victoria, was accessed to evaluate the patterns and trends of SBRT for spine metastases. The primary outcome was SBRT use and associated factors. There were 6244 patients who received 8861 courses of radiotherapy for spine metastases between 2012 and 2017. Of these, 277 (3%) courses were SBRT, which increased from 0.4% in 2012 to 5% in 2017 (P-trend < 0.001). There was a higher proportion of SBRT use in patients with prostate cancer (6%) and melanoma (4%) compared to other cancers (2-3%) ( < 0.001). Patients from the highest socioeconomic quintiles (5%) were more likely to be treated with SBRT compared to patients from the lowest socioeconomic quintiles (3%) ( < 0.001). There was a higher proportion of SBRT use in private radiotherapy centres (6%) compared to public radiotherapy centres (1%) ( < 0.001). No spine SBRT was delivered in regional centres. In multivariate analyses, the year of treatment, age, primary cancers and radiotherapy centres were independently associated with SBRT use. : This is the first Australian population-based study quantifying the increasing use of spine SBRT; however, the overall use of spine SBRT remains low. We anticipate an ongoing increase in spine SBRT, as spine SBRT gradually becomes the standard-of-care treatment for painful spine metastases.
评估澳大利亚脊柱转移瘤立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)的应用及相关因素。通过访问维多利亚放射治疗最低数据集(该数据集捕获了维多利亚州提供的所有放射治疗病例),评估了脊柱转移瘤 SBRT 的模式和趋势。主要结局是 SBRT 的应用及相关因素。2012 年至 2017 年间,有 6244 名患者接受了 8861 次脊柱转移瘤放射治疗。其中 277 例(3%)为 SBRT,2012 年为 0.4%,2017 年增至 5%(P<0.001)。与其他癌症(2%-3%)相比,前列腺癌(6%)和黑色素瘤(4%)患者的 SBRT 使用率更高(<0.001)。来自最高社会经济五分位数(5%)的患者比来自最低社会经济五分位数(3%)的患者更有可能接受 SBRT 治疗(<0.001)。与公立放疗中心(1%)相比,私立放疗中心(6%)的 SBRT 使用率更高(<0.001)。区域中心未进行脊柱 SBRT 治疗。多变量分析显示,治疗年份、年龄、原发癌和放疗中心与 SBRT 的应用独立相关。这是第一项澳大利亚基于人群的研究,定量评估了脊柱 SBRT 的应用日益增加;然而,脊柱 SBRT 的总体应用仍然较低。随着脊柱 SBRT 逐渐成为治疗疼痛性脊柱转移瘤的标准治疗方法,我们预计脊柱 SBRT 的应用将持续增加。