• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高出血风险患者中使用生物可降解聚合物或耐久性聚合物支架:一项随机、开放标签临床试验。

Biodegradable-Polymer or Durable-Polymer Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk: A Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland (M.V.).

Poland Miedziowe Centrum Zdrowia Lubin, Poland (A.W.).

出版信息

Circulation. 2023 Sep 26;148(13):989-999. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065448. Epub 2023 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065448
PMID:37624364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10516164/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited information is available on the comparative efficacy and safety of different stent platforms in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing an abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy duration after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of the biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent in patients at high bleeding risk receiving 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI.

METHODS

The Bioflow-DAPT Study is an international, randomized, open-label trial conducted at 52 interventional cardiology hospitals in 18 countries from February 24, 2020, through September 20, 2021. Patients with a clinical indication to PCI because of acute or chronic coronary syndrome who fulfilled 1 or more criteria for high bleeding risk were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomized to receive either biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents or durable-polymer, slow-release zotarolimus-eluting stents after successful lesion preparation, followed by 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy and thereafter single antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was the composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year, and was powered for noninferiority, with an absolute margin of 4.1% at 1-sided 5% alpha.

RESULTS

A total of 1948 patients at high bleeding risk were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (969 patients) or durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (979 patients). At 1 year, the primary outcome was observed in 33 of 969 patients (3.6%) in the biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent group and in 32 of 979 patients (3.4%) in the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the 1-sided 95% CI, 1.8; upper boundary of the 1-sided 97.5% CI, 2.1; <0.0001 for noninferiority for both tests).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients at high risk for bleeding who received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, the use of biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents was noninferior to the use of durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents with regard to the composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT04137510.

摘要

背景

在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后接受缩短双联抗血小板治疗时间的高出血风险患者中,不同支架平台的疗效和安全性的比较信息有限。本研究旨在比较生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物佐他莫司洗脱支架在接受 1 个月双联抗血小板治疗的高出血风险患者中的安全性和有效性。

方法

Bioflow-DAPT 研究是一项国际性、随机、开放标签试验,于 2020 年 2 月 24 日至 2021 年 9 月 20 日在 18 个国家的 52 家介入心脏病学医院进行。有因急性或慢性冠状动脉综合征而有 PCI 临床指征且符合 1 项或多项高出血风险标准的患者有资格入组。在成功准备病变后,患者被随机分配接受生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架或耐用聚合物、缓慢释放佐他莫司洗脱支架,随后接受 1 个月双联抗血小板治疗,然后接受单联抗血小板治疗。主要结局是 1 年时由心脏原因引起的死亡、心肌梗死或支架血栓形成的复合终点,该研究采用非劣效性设计,单侧 5%alpha 水平的绝对差值为 4.1%。

结果

共有 1948 例高出血风险患者被随机分配(1:1)接受生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架(969 例)或耐用聚合物佐他莫司洗脱支架(979 例)。在 1 年时,生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架组 969 例患者中有 33 例(3.6%)发生主要结局,耐用聚合物佐他莫司洗脱支架组 979 例患者中有 32 例(3.4%)发生主要结局(风险差,0.2 个百分点;单侧 95%CI 的上限为 1.8;单侧 97.5%CI 的上限为 2.1;两个检验均<0.0001,非劣效性)。

结论

在接受 PCI 后接受 1 个月双联抗血小板治疗的高出血风险患者中,与耐用聚合物佐他莫司洗脱支架相比,使用生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架在心脏原因引起的死亡、心肌梗死或支架血栓形成的复合终点方面不劣效。

注册信息

网址:https://www.

临床试验

gov;独特标识符:NCT04137510。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2800/10516164/ea3db92f5db4/cir-148-0989-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2800/10516164/7f087bbbd2a3/cir-148-0989-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2800/10516164/ea3db92f5db4/cir-148-0989-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2800/10516164/7f087bbbd2a3/cir-148-0989-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2800/10516164/ea3db92f5db4/cir-148-0989-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Biodegradable-Polymer or Durable-Polymer Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk: A Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial.高出血风险患者中使用生物可降解聚合物或耐久性聚合物支架:一项随机、开放标签临床试验。
Circulation. 2023 Sep 26;148(13):989-999. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065448. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
2
Comparison of Ultrathin- Versus Thin-Strut Stents in Patients With High Bleeding Risk PCI: Results From the COMPARE 60/80 HBR Trial: An Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled Trial.高出血风险 PCI 患者中使用超薄-与薄壁支架的比较:来自 COMPARE 60/80 HBR 试验的结果:一项开放标签、随机、对照试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Oct;17(10):e014042. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.014042. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
3
Polymer-based or Polymer-free Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk.高出血风险患者中使用聚合物基或无聚合物支架。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1208-1218. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910021. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
4
Very thin strut biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents in allcomers with coronary artery disease (BIO-RESORT): a three-arm, randomised, non-inferiority trial.非常薄的支撑物可生物降解聚合物依维莫司洗脱和西罗莫司洗脱支架与全人群冠心病使用耐用聚合物佐他莫司洗脱支架(BIO-RESORT):一项三臂、随机、非劣效试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2607-2617. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31920-1. Epub 2016 Oct 30.
5
Ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent for percutaneous coronary revascularisation (BIOSCIENCE): a randomised, single-blind, non-inferiority trial.超薄支架可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉血运重建(BIOSCIENCE):一项随机、单盲、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2014 Dec 13;384(9960):2111-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61038-2. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
6
Comparison of Durable-Polymer Zotarolimus-Eluting and Biodegradable-Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 3-Year Clinical Outcomes in the Randomized SORT OUT VI Trial.比较载有雷帕霉素的可降解聚合物涂层与载有紫杉醇的可降解聚合物涂层冠状动脉支架在冠状动脉疾病患者中的应用:随机 SORT OUT VI 试验 3 年的临床结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 13;10(3):255-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.007. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
7
Comparison of 3- to 6-Month Versus 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Intervention Using the Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents With Ultrathin Struts: The HOST-IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial.使用当代超薄支架药物洗脱支架进行冠状动脉介入治疗后3至6个月与12个月双重抗血小板治疗的比较:HOST-IDEA随机临床试验
Circulation. 2023 May 2;147(18):1358-1368. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064264. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
8
Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (BIOSTEMI): a single-blind, prospective, randomised superiority trial.生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的比较(BIOSTEMI):一项单盲、前瞻性、随机优效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 5;394(10205):1243-1253. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31877-X. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
9
Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.用于经皮冠状动脉血运重建的超薄支柱可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架对比:BIOSCIENCE试验的2年结果
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Mar 15;5(3):e003255. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003255.
10
Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (COMPARE II): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.无聚合物可降解聚合物雷帕霉素洗脱支架与持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架(COMPARE II):一项随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):651-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61852-2. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Procedural and Antithrombotic Therapy Optimization in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Narrative Review.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动患者的手术及抗栓治疗优化:一篇叙述性综述
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Apr 8;12(4):142. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12040142.
2
30-Day DAPT in Patients at High Bleeding Risk Undergoing PCI With Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Ultra-Thin Stent.接受可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱超薄支架PCI的高出血风险患者的30天双联抗血小板治疗
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 May;105(6):1502-1509. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31481. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
3
The optimal timing for intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Design and Rationale of the BIOFLOW-DAPT Trial: a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety of the Orsiro Mission Stent Compared to the Resolute Onyx Stent in Subjects at High Risk for Bleeding in Combination with 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.BIOFLOW-DAPT 试验的设计和原理:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心研究,旨在评估与 Resolute Onyx 支架相比,Orsiro Mission 支架在高出血风险患者中联合使用 1 个月双联抗血小板治疗的安全性。
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2023 Oct;16(5):1135-1143. doi: 10.1007/s12265-023-10400-x. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
2
Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: BIOFLOW V Final 5-Year Outcomes.超亲生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架比较:BIOFLOW V 研究 5 年最终结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Sep 26;15(18):1852-1860. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.07.027.
3
ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的最佳干预时机:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 9;11:1389017. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1389017. eCollection 2024.
4
48-Month Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in an All-Comers Population with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Chronic Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent.接受西罗莫司洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征和慢性冠状动脉综合征所有患者人群的48个月临床结局及预后因素
J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 3;13(11):1573. doi: 10.3390/jpm13111573.
3- or 1-Month DAPT in Patients at High Bleeding Risk Undergoing Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation.高出血风险患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中应用依维莫司洗脱支架后 3 或 1 个月的双重抗血小板治疗。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep 13;14(17):1870-1883. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.016.
4
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after PCI in Patients at High Bleeding Risk.高出血风险患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的双联抗血小板治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 28;385(18):1643-1655. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108749. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
5
Target Lesion Failure With Current Drug-Eluting Stents: Evidence From a Comprehensive Network Meta-Analysis.当前药物洗脱支架的靶病变失败:来自综合网络荟萃分析的证据。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec 28;13(24):2868-2878. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.014.
6
Validation of high bleeding risk criteria and definition as proposed by the academic research consortium for high bleeding risk.学术研究联盟针对高出血风险所提出的高出血风险标准及定义的验证
Eur Heart J. 2020 Oct 7;41(38):3743-3749. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa671.
7
Trial Design Principles for Patients at High Bleeding Risk Undergoing PCI: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中高出血风险患者的试验设计原则:美国心脏病学会科学专家小组。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Sep 22;76(12):1468-1483. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.085.
8
Polymer-based or Polymer-free Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk.高出血风险患者中使用聚合物基或无聚合物支架。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1208-1218. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910021. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
9
Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a consensus document from the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk.定义经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的高出血风险:来自高出血风险学术研究联合会的共识文件。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 14;40(31):2632-2653. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz372.
10
Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018).心肌梗死的第四次全球定义(2018年)。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 14;40(3):237-269. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy462.