Biomed Instrum Technol. 2023;57(3):87-97. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-57.3.87. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
The Medical Device Regulation (MDR) of the European Union (EU) places greater emphasis on the usability of medical devices, with the goal of eliminating or reducing the risk of infection to patients. As this goal also is applicable to sterile packaging, ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607-1:2019 introduced a usability evaluation requirement for aseptic presentation of terminally sterilized medical devices. In an effort to reduce contamination risks, this requirement focuses specifically on the sterile barrier system (SBS). However, research is limited on evaluating the usability of SBSs and their performance, from an aseptic presentation standpoint, in clinical settings. To address this research gap, we assessed 14 sterile medical devices with five different SBS configurations to elucidate how SBS configuration (type, size, and number of SBS layers) and user satisfaction levels affect usability. A total of 40 experienced clinical nurses participated in 280 individual trials (20 per SBS configuration), which were conducted in a simulated operating room. Ultraviolet fluorescent powder was used to simulate the contamination process and to evaluate the success or failure of the aseptic presentation. Pouch and tray configurations exhibited the best overall performance, while vent bags performed poorly and were considered less acceptable. Double SBS configurations outperformed single SBS configurations. The study highlighted the importance of appropriate SBS symbols to identify SBS layers, which is another patient safety-related requirement of the EU MDR. The current work also includes an analysis of the powder contamination method used in conducting the usability evaluation.
欧盟医疗器械法规 (MDR) 更加注重医疗器械的可用性,旨在消除或降低患者感染的风险。由于这一目标也适用于无菌包装,ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607-1:2019 为最终灭菌医疗器械的无菌提供引入了可用性评估要求。为了降低污染风险,该要求特别关注无菌屏障系统 (SBS)。然而,从无菌提供的角度评估 SBS 的可用性及其性能的研究有限,在临床环境中。为了解决这一研究差距,我们评估了 14 种具有五种不同 SBS 配置的无菌医疗器械,以阐明 SBS 配置(类型、大小和 SBS 层的数量)和用户满意度如何影响可用性。总共 40 名有经验的临床护士参与了 280 次单独试验(每种 SBS 配置 20 次),这些试验在模拟手术室中进行。紫外线荧光粉用于模拟污染过程,并评估无菌提供的成功或失败。袋和托盘配置表现出最佳的整体性能,而通风袋表现不佳,被认为不太可接受。双 SBS 配置优于单 SBS 配置。该研究强调了适当的 SBS 符号来识别 SBS 层的重要性,这是欧盟 MDR 中另一个与患者安全相关的要求。目前的工作还包括对用于进行可用性评估的粉末污染方法的分析。