Koperski Paweł
Institute of Functional Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Żwirki i Wigury 101, 02-089 Warszawa, Poland.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Aug 9;13(16):2570. doi: 10.3390/ani13162570.
The article presents and discusses the issues of the use of free-living invertebrates to assess the ecological status of freshwater environments with different methods of biological monitoring. Invertebrates are excluded from ethical consideration in the procedures of environmental protection, which results in the killing of many more individuals during sampling than necessary. Biomonitoring is used as a routine method for environmental protection that results in the cruel death of even millions of aquatic animals annually. In many cases, the mortality of animals used in such types of activities has been shown as excessive, e.g., because the vast majority die due to unnecessary subsampling procedures. Improperly planned and conducted procedures which result in excessive mortality have or may have a negative impact on the environment and biodiversity. Their existence as sensitive beings is reduced to an information function; they become only data useful for biomonitoring purposes. The main problem when trying to determine the mortality of invertebrates due to biomonitoring activities and its impact on natural populations seems to be the lack of access to raw data presenting how many animals were killed during sampling.
本文介绍并讨论了利用自由生活的无脊椎动物,通过不同生物监测方法评估淡水环境生态状况的相关问题。在环境保护程序中,无脊椎动物未被纳入伦理考量,这导致在采样过程中被杀死的个体数量远超必要数量。生物监测被用作环境保护的常规方法,每年甚至导致数百万水生动物惨遭残酷死亡。在许多情况下,此类活动中所用动物的死亡率已被证明过高,例如,绝大多数动物因不必要的二次采样程序而死亡。规划和实施不当的程序导致过高死亡率,已经或可能对环境和生物多样性产生负面影响。它们作为敏感生物的存在被简化为一种信息功能;它们仅仅成为对生物监测目的有用的数据。在试图确定生物监测活动导致的无脊椎动物死亡率及其对自然种群的影响时,主要问题似乎是无法获取展示采样期间有多少动物被杀死的原始数据。