• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索福利友好型猪肉养殖中的消费者行为与偏好:一项多变量分析

Exploring Consumer Behavior and Preferences in Welfare-Friendly Pork Breeding: A Multivariate Analysis.

作者信息

Pugliese Michela, Previti Annalisa, De Pascale Angelina, Alibrandi Angela, Zirilli Agata, Biondi Vito, Passantino Annamaria, Monti Salvatore, Giannetto Carlo, Lanfranchi Maurizio

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Via Umberto Palatucci, 98168 Messina, Italy.

Department of Economics, University of Messina, Via dei Verdi 75, 98122 Messina, Italy.

出版信息

Foods. 2023 Aug 10;12(16):3014. doi: 10.3390/foods12163014.

DOI:10.3390/foods12163014
PMID:37628013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10453549/
Abstract

This study investigates consumer behavior and interest in "welfare-friendly" forms of pork production, considering the growing presence of animal welfare-focused breeding practices. The aim is to outline the typical profile of pork consumers and identify the key attributes influencing their purchasing decisions. A survey was conducted on a sample of 286 individuals after excluding those who only consumed beef and/or poultry or identified as vegetarians/vegans. Regression coefficients (b), 95% Confidence Intervals (95% C.I.), and -values were reported for univariate and multivariate models. Statistical significance was determined at < 0.05 (indicated in bold). The findings indicate that younger participants show greater sensitivity towards consuming meat raised using welfare-friendly methods, raising considerations about the age composition of the sample. The research's originality lies in evaluating consumer interest in pork raised with animal welfare-respecting techniques. The use of appropriate statistical tools, such as multivariate and multilayer models, allows effective solutions for multidimensional hypothesis testing problems in non-parametric permutation inference.

摘要

考虑到以动物福利为重点的养殖方式日益增多,本研究调查了消费者对“福利友好型”猪肉生产形式的行为和兴趣。目的是勾勒出猪肉消费者的典型特征,并确定影响其购买决策的关键属性。在排除仅食用牛肉和/或家禽或自称素食者/纯素食者的个体后,对286名个体进行了抽样调查。报告了单变量和多变量模型的回归系数(b)、95%置信区间(95% C.I.)和p值。统计显著性设定为p < 0.05(加粗显示)。研究结果表明,年轻参与者对食用采用福利友好型方法饲养的肉类表现出更高的敏感度,这引发了对样本年龄构成的思考。该研究的独到之处在于评估消费者对采用尊重动物福利技术饲养的猪肉的兴趣。使用适当的统计工具,如多变量和多层模型,可为非参数置换推断中的多维假设检验问题提供有效的解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05f0/10453549/8431e7df2584/foods-12-03014-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05f0/10453549/8431e7df2584/foods-12-03014-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05f0/10453549/8431e7df2584/foods-12-03014-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring Consumer Behavior and Preferences in Welfare-Friendly Pork Breeding: A Multivariate Analysis.探索福利友好型猪肉养殖中的消费者行为与偏好:一项多变量分析
Foods. 2023 Aug 10;12(16):3014. doi: 10.3390/foods12163014.
2
Willingness to Pay a Higher Price for Pork Obtained Using Animal-Friendly Raising Techniques: A Consumers' Opinion Survey.为采用动物友好型饲养技术获得的猪肉支付更高价格的意愿:一项消费者意见调查。
Foods. 2023 Nov 21;12(23):4201. doi: 10.3390/foods12234201.
3
Decoy Effect on Consumers' Purchase Behaviors in Relation to Meat Products: Comparison of Pork and Chicken.诱饵效应对消费者肉类产品购买行为的影响:猪肉与鸡肉的比较
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 13;12:679256. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679256. eCollection 2021.
4
Consumers' perceptions and willingness to purchase pork labelled 'raised without antibiotics'.消费者对标有“无抗生素养殖”猪肉的认知及购买意愿。
Appetite. 2022 Apr 1;171:105900. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105900. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
5
How do human values influence the beef preferences of consumer segments regarding animal welfare and environmentally friendly production?人类价值观如何影响消费者群体对动物福利和环保生产的牛肉偏好?
Meat Sci. 2018 Dec;146:75-86. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.07.030. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
6
Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability.消费者对具有动物福利、瘦肉精检测和可追溯性信息的食品的支付意愿。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 26;16(19):3616. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193616.
7
European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork.欧洲公民和消费者对牛肉和猪肉的态度和偏好。
Meat Sci. 2010 Feb;84(2):284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 May 8.
8
Change in Norwegian consumer attitudes towards piglet castration: increased emphasis on animal welfare.挪威消费者对仔猪去势态度的变化:对动物福利的重视日益增加。
Acta Vet Scand. 2020 May 26;62(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13028-020-00522-6.
9
Effects of demographic factors and information sources on United States consumer perceptions of animal welfare.人口因素和信息来源对美国消费者动物福利认知的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2014 Jul;92(7):3161-73. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-6874.
10
Emerging market for pork with animal welfare attribute in China: An ethical perspective.中国具有动物福利属性的猪肉新兴市场:伦理视角。
Meat Sci. 2023 Jan;195:108994. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108994. Epub 2022 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Dietary supplementation of grape seed proanthocyanidins improves growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in growing-finishing pigs.在生长育肥猪日粮中添加葡萄籽原花青素可改善其生长性能、胴体性状和肉质。
Anim Nutr. 2024 Nov 20;20:200-210. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2024.10.006. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Consumer animal welfare and healthy perception of fresh sausages' fiber fat replaced and elaborated with meat from non-castrated male pigs.消费者对用未阉割公猪肉替代并制作的新鲜香肠的动物福利和健康认知。
Food Sci Nutr. 2024 Jul 4;12(9):6720-6734. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4278. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Automatic Quality Assessment of Pork Belly via Deep Learning and Ultrasound Imaging.

本文引用的文献

1
How COVID-19 changed Italian consumers' behavior.新冠疫情如何改变了意大利消费者的行为。
Glob Financ J. 2022 Feb;51:100680. doi: 10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100680. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
2
Between the farm and the fork: job quality in sustainable food systems.从农场到餐桌:可持续食品系统中的工作质量。
Agric Human Values. 2023;40(1):317-358. doi: 10.1007/s10460-022-10362-x. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
3
Food consumption and the Covid-19 pandemic: The role of sustainability in purchasing choices.食品消费与新冠疫情:可持续性在购买选择中的作用。
基于深度学习与超声成像的猪肚自动质量评估
Animals (Basel). 2024 Jul 27;14(15):2189. doi: 10.3390/ani14152189.
4
Willingness to Pay a Higher Price for Pork Obtained Using Animal-Friendly Raising Techniques: A Consumers' Opinion Survey.为采用动物友好型饲养技术获得的猪肉支付更高价格的意愿:一项消费者意见调查。
Foods. 2023 Nov 21;12(23):4201. doi: 10.3390/foods12234201.
5
Consumer Preferences for Cured Meat Products from the Autochthonous Black Slavonian Pig.消费者对源自本土黑斯拉夫尼亚猪的腌制肉制品的偏好。
Foods. 2023 Oct 5;12(19):3666. doi: 10.3390/foods12193666.
J Agric Food Res. 2022 Dec;10:100385. doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100385. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
4
Gender and Age Effects on Public Attitudes to, and Knowledge of, Animal Welfare in China.性别与年龄对中国公众动物福利态度及认知的影响
Animals (Basel). 2022 May 26;12(11):1367. doi: 10.3390/ani12111367.
5
Linking Animal Welfare and Antibiotic Use in Pig Farming-A Review.养猪业中动物福利与抗生素使用的关联——综述
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jan 17;12(2):216. doi: 10.3390/ani12020216.
6
Current Consumer Perceptions of Animal Welfare across Different Farming Sectors on the Island of Ireland.爱尔兰岛不同养殖部门当前消费者对动物福利的认知
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jan 13;12(2):185. doi: 10.3390/ani12020185.
7
Problematic use of the internet during the COVID-19 pandemic: Good practices and mental health recommendations.新冠疫情期间互联网的问题使用:良好实践和心理健康建议。
Compr Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;112:152279. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152279. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
8
Towards reduced meat consumption: A systematic literature review of intervention effectiveness, 2001-2019.迈向减少肉类消费:2001-2019 年干预有效性的系统文献综述。
Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105739. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105739. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
9
Psychological factors and consumer behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.心理因素与 COVID-19 大流行期间的消费者行为。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 16;16(8):e0256095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256095. eCollection 2021.
10
The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Food Consumers' Awareness of Antimicrobial Resistance, OneHealth, and Animal Welfare Information on Food Labels.新冠疫情对食品消费者对抗菌素耐药性、一体化健康以及食品标签上动物福利信息的认知的影响
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Jun 29;8:678509. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.678509. eCollection 2021.