• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SuperPATH——证据现状与进一步研究:一项范围综述与质量评估

SuperPATH-Current Status of Evidence and Further Investigations: A Scoping Review and Quality Assessment.

作者信息

Ramadanov Nikolai

机构信息

Center of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Brandenburg Medical School, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 19;12(16):5395. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165395.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12165395
PMID:37629436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10455631/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

SuperPATH is a novel minimally invasive technique for hip replacement that is gaining increasing attention. The aim of this review was to determine the nature, extent, and quality of current research evidence on SuperPATH and to identify areas for further investigations.

METHODS

A bibliometric search was conducted in PubMed up to 1 August 2023 using the search term "SuperPATH". Data extraction and quality assessment were performed for relevant articles.

RESULTS

The bibliometric search yielded 51 articles on SuperPATH, 9 of which were meta-analyses, 11 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 4 were prospective non-RCTs, 12 were retrospective comparative studies, 11 were case series, and 4 were other article types. Most articles were published between 2015 and 2023, with a steady increase in publications per year. The articles originated from 13 countries, of which China was the most productive (35%). The quality assessment of the meta-analyses showed that 22.2% were of moderate quality, 66.7% were of low quality, and 11.1% were of critically low quality. The quality assessment of the RCTs showed that 36.4% had a low risk of bias (RoB), 27.2% revealed some concerns, and 36.4% had a high RoB. All studies were evaluated for content and taken into account in the formulation of recommendations and conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

The SuperPATH evidence varies from low to high quality. There is a steady increase in SuperPATH publications in the English-language literature and an uneven distribution of the article origins, with most articles coming from China. Consistent terminology should be used in the future, referring to the surgical approach as the direct superior approach (DSA) and to the surgical technique as SuperPATH. This review provides further concrete suggestions for future investigations and recommendations to improve study quality.

摘要

背景

SuperPATH是一种用于髋关节置换的新型微创技术,正受到越来越多的关注。本综述的目的是确定当前关于SuperPATH的研究证据的性质、范围和质量,并确定需要进一步研究的领域。

方法

截至2023年8月1日,在PubMed中使用搜索词“SuperPATH”进行文献计量检索。对相关文章进行数据提取和质量评估。

结果

文献计量检索产生了51篇关于SuperPATH的文章,其中9篇是荟萃分析,11篇是随机对照试验(RCT),4篇是前瞻性非RCT,12篇是回顾性比较研究,11篇是病例系列,4篇是其他文章类型。大多数文章发表于2015年至2023年之间,每年的发表量稳步增加。文章来自13个国家,其中中国的发文量最多(35%)。荟萃分析的质量评估显示,22.2%为中等质量,66.7%为低质量,11.1%为极低质量。RCT的质量评估显示,36.4%的偏倚风险(RoB)较低,27.2%存在一些问题,36.4%的RoB较高。对所有研究进行了内容评估,并在制定建议和结论时予以考虑。

结论

SuperPATH的证据质量参差不齐。英文文献中关于SuperPATH的出版物稳步增加,文章来源分布不均,大多数文章来自中国。未来应使用一致的术语,将手术入路称为直接上方入路(DSA),将手术技术称为SuperPATH。本综述为未来的研究提供了进一步的具体建议,并为提高研究质量提出了建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42e5/10455631/e07cf5c62944/jcm-12-05395-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42e5/10455631/22002ed2e407/jcm-12-05395-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42e5/10455631/f94c25f0ecf2/jcm-12-05395-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42e5/10455631/e07cf5c62944/jcm-12-05395-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42e5/10455631/22002ed2e407/jcm-12-05395-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42e5/10455631/f94c25f0ecf2/jcm-12-05395-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42e5/10455631/e07cf5c62944/jcm-12-05395-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
SuperPATH-Current Status of Evidence and Further Investigations: A Scoping Review and Quality Assessment.SuperPATH——证据现状与进一步研究:一项范围综述与质量评估
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 19;12(16):5395. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165395.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Comparison of short-term outcomes between direct anterior approach (DAA) and SuperPATH in total hip replacement: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.直接前入路(DAA)与 SuperPATH 在全髋关节置换术中短期疗效的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 May 20;16(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02315-7.
4
Direct anterior approach vs. SuperPATH vs. conventional approaches in total hip replacement: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.直接前入路与 SuperPATH 入路和传统入路在全髋关节置换术中的比较:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Dec;107(8):103058. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103058. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
5
Evaluation of Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.全髋关节置换术手术入路的比较疗效和安全性评价:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2253942. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53942.
6
Comparison of short-term outcomes between SuperPATH approach and conventional approaches in hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.髋关节置换术中 SuperPATH 入路与传统入路的短期疗效比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Sep 17;15(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01884-3.
7
An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Total Hip Arthroplasty through SuperPATH versus Conventional Approaches.经 SuperPATH 与传统入路行全髋关节置换术的随机对照试验的更新荟萃分析
Orthop Surg. 2022 May;14(5):807-823. doi: 10.1111/os.13239. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
8
Hemiarthroplasty through SuperPATH versus hemiarthroplasty through conventional approaches in patients with femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经 SuperPATH 入路与传统入路行人工股骨头置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的系统评价和 Meta 分析:随机对照试验研究
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 21;13(1):22861. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50206-0.
9
Direct and indirect comparisons in network meta-analysis of SuperPATH, direct anterior and posterior approaches in total hip arthroplasty.直接和间接比较在 SuperPATH、全髋关节置换术直接前入路和后入路的网络荟萃分析中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 6;12(1):16778. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20242-3.
10
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the SuperPATH Approach in Hip Arthroplasty.髋关节置换中 SuperPATH 入路的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jul 21;2021:5056291. doi: 10.1155/2021/5056291. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-related Predictors for the Functional Outcome of SuperPATH Hemiarthroplasty versus Conventional Approach Hemiarthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.患者相关因素对 SuperPATH 半髋关节置换术与传统半髋关节置换术功能结局的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Apr;16(4):791-801. doi: 10.1111/os.14006. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
2
Hemiarthroplasty through SuperPATH versus hemiarthroplasty through conventional approaches in patients with femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经 SuperPATH 入路与传统入路行人工股骨头置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的系统评价和 Meta 分析:随机对照试验研究
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 21;13(1):22861. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50206-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally invasive surgery supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPath) arthroplasty.经皮辅助小切口囊外全髋关节置换术(SuperPath)。
Acta Biomed. 2023 Jun 14;94(3):e2023069. doi: 10.23750/abm.v94i3.13922.
2
Comparison of the early clinical efficacy of the SuperPath approach versus the modified Hardinge approach in total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial.SuperPath 入路与改良 Hardinge 入路治疗老年股骨颈骨折全髋关节置换术的早期临床疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 19;18(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03713-9.
3
Evaluation of Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
全髋关节置换术手术入路的比较疗效和安全性评价:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2253942. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53942.
4
The Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted Total Hip Approach Does Not Provide Any Clinical Advantage Over the Conventional Posterior Approach for THA in a Randomized Clinical Trial.在一项随机临床试验中,经囊外入路微创全髋关节置换术并不比传统后路入路具有任何临床优势。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jun 1;481(6):1116-1125. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002449. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
5
SuperPath® vs. direct anterior approach : A retrospective comparison between two minimally invasive approaches in total hip arthroplasty.SuperPath® 与直接前入路:全髋关节置换术中两种微创入路的回顾性比较。
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2022 Dec;51(12):986-995. doi: 10.1007/s00132-022-04310-0. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
6
Direct and indirect comparisons in network meta-analysis of SuperPATH, direct anterior and posterior approaches in total hip arthroplasty.直接和间接比较在 SuperPATH、全髋关节置换术直接前入路和后入路的网络荟萃分析中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 6;12(1):16778. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20242-3.
7
The Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted Total Hip (SuperPATH) Approach Revisited: Technique Improvements after the Perioperative Experience of 344 Cases.再探经皮辅助髋关节囊上入路全髋关节置换术(SuperPATH):344例围手术期经验后的技术改进
Life (Basel). 2022 Jun 30;12(7):981. doi: 10.3390/life12070981.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis on SuperPATH approach versus conventional approaches for hip arthroplasty.系统评价和荟萃分析:SuperPATH 入路与传统入路髋关节置换术的比较。
Hip Int. 2023 Jul;33(4):655-663. doi: 10.1177/11207000221099862. Epub 2022 Jun 5.
9
An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Total Hip Arthroplasty through SuperPATH versus Conventional Approaches.经 SuperPATH 与传统入路行全髋关节置换术的随机对照试验的更新荟萃分析
Orthop Surg. 2022 May;14(5):807-823. doi: 10.1111/os.13239. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
10
Efficacy of Supercapsular Percutaneously-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Elderly With Femoral Neck Fractures: A Meta-analysis.经皮辅助双极半髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2022 Feb 16;13:21514593221074176. doi: 10.1177/21514593221074176. eCollection 2022.