Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Aurobindo College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Odontology. 2024 Apr;112(2):364-371. doi: 10.1007/s10266-023-00847-4. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
This study aimed to analyse the effect of root-end resection on the sealing ability of orthograde apical plugs of three root-end filling materials (MTA Repair HP, Biodentine, MTA Plus) using the bacterial leakage method and compare it with the retrograde root-end filling technique. Eighty-four extracted mandibular premolar teeth with single root and single straight canals were selected and randomly divided into two main experimental groups (n = 36) depending on the apical plug placement technique and a control: Group I: orthograde technique, followed by root-end resection; Group II: retrograde root-end filling technique; one control Group III (n = 12): obturation with gutta-percha, followed by root-end resection. Experimental groups were further subdivided into three subgroups A, B, and C (n = 12) depending on the three different root-end filling materials used. An apical plug of 3 mm thickness was obtained in both the experimental groups. The apical sealing ability was evaluated with the dual-chamber bacterial leakage method. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis test. By the end of 30 days, the occurrence of turbidity indicating bacterial leakage was 75% in MTA Repair HP, 83.3% in Biodentine, and 91.7% in MTA Plus samples. This trend of turbidity was similar in both orthograde and retrograde technique. The control group showed turbidity in all the samples (100%). More MTA Repair HP samples (25%) survived the 30 days observation period with no bacterial leakage compared to Biodentine (16.7%) and MTA Plus (8.3%). The sealing ability of already set root-end filling materials placed through the orthograde technique did not deteriorate after root-end resection. Also among three root-end filling materials, MTA Repair HP presented the lowest bacterial microleakage followed by Biodentine and MTA Plus, respectively.
本研究旨在分析根管倒充填技术与三种根管充填材料(MTA Repair HP、Biodentine、MTA Plus)的顺行根尖段封闭能力的差异,使用细菌渗漏法,并将其与逆行根管充填技术进行比较。选择 84 颗具有单根和单一直根管的下颌前磨牙,根据根尖段封闭材料的放置技术随机分为两组(n=36),实验组:顺行技术,随后进行根尖切除;实验组 2:逆行根管充填技术;对照组 3(n=12):牙胶尖根管充填,随后进行根尖切除。实验组根据使用的三种不同的根管充填材料进一步分为三个亚组 A、B 和 C(n=12)。在两组实验中都获得了 3mm 厚的根尖段封闭。采用双室细菌渗漏法评估根尖封闭能力。采用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析检验进行统计学分析。30 天后,MTA Repair HP 样本中发生浑浊的细菌渗漏发生率为 75%,Biodentine 为 83.3%,MTA Plus 为 91.7%。这种浑浊趋势在顺行和逆行技术中相似。对照组所有样本均出现浑浊(100%)。与 Biodentine(16.7%)和 MTA Plus(8.3%)相比,有更多的 MTA Repair HP 样本(25%)在 30 天观察期内没有细菌渗漏而存活下来。在顺行技术中放置的已凝固的根尖封闭材料的封闭能力在根尖切除后没有恶化。在三种根尖封闭材料中,MTA Repair HP 表现出最低的细菌微渗漏,其次是 Biodentine 和 MTA Plus。