Veterinary Population Medicine Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA.
Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, Madison, WI, USA.
Prev Vet Med. 2023 Sep;218:106000. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.106000. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
The objective of this study was to evaluate risks related to introduction of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) to farmed cervid herds in Minnesota (MN), Pennsylvania (PA), and Wisconsin (WI). This was the first study to evaluate risk factors related to multiple pathways of CWD transmission to farmed cervid herds. Participating herds in this case-control study included 22 case and 49 control herds identified through participation in the respective mandatory State CWD herd program. Data was voluntarily collected from white-tailed deer (WTD) study herds using a questionnaire and state animal health agency databases. Univariable analyses identified associations between CWD-positive herds and variables representing different transmission pathways, including direct contact with infected farmed cervids (imported from a herd that later tested positive for CWD) odds ratio (OR):7.16, 95 % confidence intervals (CI):1.64-31.21 and indirect contact with infected wild cervids (access of domestic cats to pens or feed storage area) OR:4.07, 95 % CI:1.35-12.26, observed evidence of mammalian scavengers inside or outside of fenceline in the previous 12 months OR:6.55, 95 % CI:1.37-31.32, ≤ 5 km distance to nearest detected CWD-positive wild cervid OR:3.08, 95 % CI:1.01-9.39, forested area crosses the perimeter fenceline OR:3.54, 95 % CI:1.13-11.11, ≤ 0.3 m distance of water source to fenceline OR:4.71, 95 % CI:1.60-13.83, and water source shared with wild cervids (running or standing water) OR:4.17, 95 % CI:1.34-12.92. Three variables from univariable analyses that represented different biological transmission pathways were placed in a Firth's penalized maximum likelihood multivariable logistic regression to evaluate associations between transmission pathway and CWD herd infection status. For the issue of low sample size and overfitting, 95 % CIs for estimated coefficients for the three variables were computed via bootstrapping of 10,000 independent bootstrap samples. The three biological variables were significantly associated with herd CWD infection status: imported cervids from a herd that later tested positive for CWD (OR:5.63; 95 % CI:1.1-28.2), ≤ 0.3 m distance of cervid water source to perimeter fenceline (OR:4.83; 95 % CI:1.5-16.1), and ≤ 5 km distance to nearest detected CWD-positive wild cervid (OR:4.10; 95 % CI:1.1-15.2). The risk factors associated with CWD herd status identified in this study indicated the importance of transmission through direct contact pathways with infected cervid herds (introduction of cervids from herds later identified as CWD-infected) and indirect contact pathways with infected wild cervids that could be related to other animals through the perimeter fence. Further studies are needed to confirm and clarify understanding of indirect pathways to allow development of improved biosecurity practices to prevent CWD introduction to cervid herds.
本研究旨在评估慢性消耗病(CWD)引入明尼苏达州(MN)、宾夕法尼亚州(PA)和威斯康星州(WI)养殖鹿群的风险。这是第一项评估与养殖鹿群 CWD 多种传播途径相关风险因素的研究。本病例对照研究中的参与鹿群包括 22 个病例群和 49 个对照群,这些群是通过各自的强制性州 CWD 牛群计划参与确定的。通过问卷调查和州动物卫生机构数据库,从白尾鹿(WTD)研究群中自愿收集数据。单变量分析确定了 CWD 阳性群与代表不同传播途径的变量之间的关联,包括与感染的养殖鹿群的直接接触(从后来检测出 CWD 阳性的牛群中进口),比值比(OR):7.16,95%置信区间(CI):1.64-31.21,以及与感染的野生鹿群的间接接触(家猫进入围栏或饲料储存区),OR:4.07,95%CI:1.35-12.26,观察到在过去 12 个月内有哺乳动物食腐动物在围栏内或围栏外,OR:6.55,95%CI:1.37-31.32,与最近检测到的 CWD 阳性野生鹿群的距离≤5 公里,OR:3.08,95%CI:1.01-9.39,森林区域穿过围栏周边,OR:3.54,95%CI:1.13-11.11,与围栏的距离≤0.3 米,OR:4.71,95%CI:1.60-13.83,以及水源与围栏共享(流动或静止水),OR:4.17,95%CI:1.34-12.92。三个单变量分析中代表不同生物传播途径的变量被放入 Firth 的惩罚最大似然多变量逻辑回归中,以评估传播途径与 CWD 牛群感染状况之间的关联。由于样本量小和过度拟合的问题,通过对 10,000 个独立 bootstrap 样本进行 bootstrap 来计算三个变量的估计系数的 95%置信区间。三个生物变量与牛群 CWD 感染状况显著相关:从后来检测出 CWD 阳性的牛群中进口的鹿群(OR:5.63;95%CI:1.1-28.2),与鹿群水源的距离≤0.3 米与围栏周边(OR:4.83;95%CI:1.5-16.1),以及与最近检测到的 CWD 阳性野生鹿群的距离≤5 公里(OR:4.10;95%CI:1.1-15.2)。本研究中确定的与 CWD 牛群状况相关的风险因素表明,与感染鹿群(从后来确定为 CWD 感染的牛群中进口的鹿群)的直接接触途径以及与感染的野生鹿群的间接接触途径(通过围栏与其他动物接触)的传播很重要。需要进一步研究来确认和澄清对间接途径的理解,以制定改进的生物安全措施,防止 CWD 引入鹿群。