Pölzl Gerhard, Altenberger Johann, Comín-Colet Josep, Delgado Juan F, Fedele Francesco, García-González Martín Jesús, Gustafsson Finn, Masip Josep, Papp Zoltán, Störk Stefan, Ulmer Hanno, Maier Sarah, Vrtovec Bojan, Wikström Gerhard, Zima Endre, Bauer Axel
Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Cardiac Rehabilitation Center Grossgmain, Pensionsversicherungsanstalt, Teaching Hospital of Paracelsus Medical Private University, Salzburg, Austria.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 Nov;25(11):2007-2017. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3006. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
The LeoDOR trial explored the efficacy and safety of intermittent levosimendan therapy in the vulnerable phase following a hospitalization for acute heart failure (HF).
In this prospective multicentre, double-blind, two-armed trial, patients with advanced HF were randomized 2:1 at the end of an index hospitalization for acute HF to intermittent levosimendan therapy or matching placebo for 12 weeks. All patients had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤30% during index hospitalization. Levosimendan was administered according to centre preference either as 6 h infusion at a rate of 0.2 μg/kg/min every 2 weeks, or as 24 h infusion at a rate of 0.1 μg/kg/min every 3 weeks. The primary efficacy assessment after 14 weeks was based on a global rank score consisting of three hierarchical groups. Secondary clinical endpoints included the composite risk of tiers 1 and 2 at 14 and 26 weeks, respectively. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the planned number of patients could not be recruited. The final modified intention-to-treat analysis included 145 patients (93 in the combined levosimendan arm, 52 in the placebo arm), which reduced the statistical power to detect a 20% risk reduction in the primary endpoint to 60%. Compared with placebo, intermittent levosimendan had no significant effect on the primary endpoint: the mean rank score was 72.55 for the levosimendan group versus 73.81 for the placebo group (p = 0.863). However, there was a signal towards a higher incidence of the individual clinical components of the primary endpoint in the levosimendan group versus the placebo group both after 14 weeks (hazard ratio [HR] 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-7.68; p = 0.021) and 26 weeks (HR 1.64, 95% CI 0.87-3.11; p = 0.122).
Among patients recently hospitalized with HF and reduced LVEF, intermittent levosimendan therapy did not improve post-hospitalization clinical stability.
LeoDOR试验探讨了急性心力衰竭(HF)住院后脆弱期间歇性左西孟旦治疗的疗效和安全性。
在这项前瞻性多中心、双盲、双臂试验中,晚期HF患者在急性HF指数住院结束时按2:1随机分组,接受间歇性左西孟旦治疗或匹配安慰剂治疗12周。所有患者在指数住院期间左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤30%。左西孟旦根据中心偏好,每2周以0.2μg/kg/min的速率进行6小时输注,或每3周以0.1μg/kg/min的速率进行24小时输注。14周后的主要疗效评估基于由三个等级组组成的总体排名分数。次要临床终点分别为14周和26周时1级和2级的综合风险。由于新冠疫情,未能招募到计划数量的患者。最终的改良意向性分析纳入了145例患者(左西孟旦联合治疗组93例,安慰剂组52例),这将检测主要终点风险降低20%的统计效力降低至60%。与安慰剂相比,间歇性左西孟旦对主要终点无显著影响:左西孟旦组的平均排名分数为72.55,而安慰剂组为73.81(p = 0.863)。然而,在14周后(风险比[HR]2.94,95%置信区间[CI]1.12 - 7.68;p = 0.021)和26周后(HR 1.64,95%CI 0.87 - 3.11;p = 0.122),左西孟旦组主要终点的各个临床组成部分的发生率均有高于安慰剂组的趋势。
在近期因HF住院且LVEF降低的患者中,间歇性左西孟旦治疗未能改善出院后的临床稳定性。