• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

壳聚糖和壳聚糖纳米粒作为终末冲洗液对清除玷污层和根管内牙本质矿物质含量的效果。

Efficacy of using chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles as final irrigating solutions on smear layer removal and mineral content of intraradicular dentin.

机构信息

Departments of Endodontic, Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Faculty of Dentistry, British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2023 Apr-Jun;41(2):170-177. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_89_23.

DOI:10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_89_23
PMID:37635477
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the effect of using chitosan, nano-chitosan, and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as final irrigating solutions on smear layer cleanliness and Ca/P ratio of dentin.

METHODOLOGY

Forty-eight decoronated human single-rooted teeth were used. They were divided randomly into four groups (n = 12) based on the final irrigating solution used as follows: (a) control group (IA; n = 6) normal saline, (IB; n = 6) were left unprepared; group II - 0.2% chitosan; group III - 0.2% nano-chitosan; and group IV - 17% EDTA. Samples were prepared using ProTaper Next and irrigated with 2.6% NaOCl 5 ml after each instrument using 31-gauge needle. Final rinse was used 5 ml/3 min according to the assigned group. The specimens were prepared for evaluation.

RESULTS

Best smear layer removal was observed in group IV. No statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed between the experimental groups (II, III, and IV) coronally; however, a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was observed between groups II and IV at middle and apical thirds. Intragroup comparison showed that apical third exhibited the highest mean smear layer score among all experimental groups. The highest mean Ca/P ratio was in the 0.2% nano-chitosan group, while the highest calcium loss was in the 17% EDTA group.

CONCLUSIONS

17% EDTA is a potent chelating agent that can successfully remove the smear layer but compromises the Ca/p ratio of dentin. However, 0.2% chitosan and its nanoparticles have comparable chelating effects and induce remineralization of the root canal dentin.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了使用壳聚糖、纳米壳聚糖和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)作为最终冲洗液对玷污层清洁度和牙本质 Ca/P 比值的影响。

方法

将 48 颗去冠的人单根恒牙随机分为 4 组(n = 12),根据最终冲洗液的不同分组如下:(a)对照组(IA;n = 6)生理盐水,(IB;n = 6)未预处理;组 II-0.2%壳聚糖;组 III-0.2%纳米壳聚糖;组 IV-17%EDTA。使用 ProTaper Next 预备样本,并在每次使用 31 号针头的 2.6% NaOCl 5ml 后用 31 号针头冲洗。根据分组使用 5ml/3min 进行最终冲洗。制备标本进行评估。

结果

组 IV 的玷污层去除效果最佳。实验各组(II、III 和 IV)冠部之间无统计学差异(P > 0.05);然而,中、根尖部之间组 II 和 IV 之间存在统计学差异(P < 0.05)。组内比较显示,所有实验组中,根尖部的玷污层评分最高。0.2%纳米壳聚糖组的 Ca/P 比值最高,而 17%EDTA 组的钙损失最高。

结论

17%EDTA 是一种有效的螯合剂,可成功去除玷污层,但会损害牙本质的 Ca/P 比值。然而,0.2%壳聚糖及其纳米颗粒具有相似的螯合作用,并诱导根管牙本质的再矿化。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of using chitosan and chitosan nanoparticles as final irrigating solutions on smear layer removal and mineral content of intraradicular dentin.壳聚糖和壳聚糖纳米粒作为终末冲洗液对清除玷污层和根管内牙本质矿物质含量的效果。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2023 Apr-Jun;41(2):170-177. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_89_23.
2
Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.不同终末冲洗液激活方案对弯曲根管内玷污层去除效果的影响。
J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 13.
3
A comparative scanning electron microscopy evaluation of smear layer removal with apple vinegar and sodium hypochlorite associated with EDTA.采用 EDTA 联合苹果酸和次氯酸钠清除玷污层的比较扫描电镜评价。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Nov-Dec;19(6):639-43. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011000600016.
4
Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigating solutions: a comparative scanning electron microscope evaluation.不同冲洗液去除玷污层的效果:扫描电子显微镜对比评估
Indian J Dent Res. 2014 Sep-Oct;25(5):617-22. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.147107.
5
Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.比较马来酸和乙二胺四乙酸在去除器械处理人根管内玷污层的效果:扫描电镜研究。
J Endod. 2009 Nov;35(11):1573-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.021. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
6
Canal disinfection using Nd: YAG Laser, synchronized microbubble-photodynamic activation, and carbon quantum dots on microhardness, smear layer removal, and extrusion bond strength of zirconia post to canal dentin. An invitro scanning electron microscopic analysis.采用钕:钇铝石榴石激光、同步微泡光动力激活和碳量子点对氧化锆桩根管牙本质的微硬度、清除玷污层和挤出粘结强度的影响。一项体外扫描电子显微镜分析。
Microsc Res Tech. 2024 Sep;87(9):2043-2052. doi: 10.1002/jemt.24584. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
7
Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.使用扫描电子显微镜对手动与旋转ProTaper技术联合制备的根管壁上的玷污层和碎屑进行比较评估。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Jul 1;17(7):574-81.
8
In Vitro Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris Removal and Antimicrobial Activity of Different Irrigating Solutions.不同冲洗液对玷污层和碎屑去除及抗菌活性的体外评价。
Eur Endod J. 2024 Jan 1;9(1):81-88. doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.19042. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
9
Evaluation of the smear layer removal and erosive capacity of EDTA, boric acid, citric acid and desy clean solutions: an in vitro study.乙二胺四乙酸、硼酸、柠檬酸和去垢清洁溶液去除玷污层及侵蚀能力的评估:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2015 Sep 3;15:104. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0090-y.
10
Comparison of the effect of four decalcifying agents combined with 60°C 3% sodium hypochlorite on smear layer removal.比较四种脱钙剂联合 60°C 3%次氯酸钠对清除玷污层效果的影响。
J Endod. 2012 Mar;38(3):381-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.11.013. Epub 2011 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of smear layer removal utilizing a conservative root canal instrumentation technique involving magnetically agitated irrigation with iron paramagnetic nanoparticles.利用一种保守的根管预备技术评估玷污层的去除情况,该技术涉及用铁顺磁性纳米颗粒进行磁搅拌冲洗。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 8;25(1):1130. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06431-2.
2
Comparative Assessment for the Effect of Variable Chelating Agents on Dentin Microhardness: An Study.不同螯合剂对牙本质微硬度影响的比较评估:一项研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 May;17(Suppl 1):S479-S484. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1376_24. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
3
Chitosan's Ability to Remove the Smear Layer-A Systematic Review of Ex Vivo Studies.
壳聚糖去除玷污层的能力——体外研究的系统评价
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 14;61(1):114. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010114.
4
Smear layer removal and antimicrobial efficacy of chitosan as a root canal irrigant: a systematic review of in-vitro studies.壳聚糖作为根管冲洗剂去除玷污层及抗菌效果:体外研究的系统评价
Odontology. 2025 Jan;113(1):61-79. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00999-x. Epub 2024 Sep 20.