• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喉咽反流病的门诊临床标志物:一项相关性研究。

Outpatient Clinical Markers for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Correlational Study.

作者信息

Paramasivam Praveen Kumar, Sahu Pankaj Kumar, Bishnoi Tapasya, Dutta Angshuman, Yadav Mukesh Kumar, Marlapudi Sudheer Kumar

机构信息

Department of ENT, Command Hospital Airforce Bangalore, Cambridge Layout, AGARAM Post, Bangalore, Karnataka 560007 India.

出版信息

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Sep;75(3):2042-2048. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03805-2. Epub 2023 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1007/s12070-023-03805-2
PMID:37636640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10447725/
Abstract

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is the result of retrograde flow of gastric contents to the laryngopharynx which comes in contact with tissues of the upper aerodigestive tract. Due to ill defined criteria for diagnosis & followup, LPRD patients are underdiagnosed & undertreated. Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and the Reflux Finding Score (RFS) are two clinical methods which can be utilised especially in the outpatient setup. This study was done with the aim to assess various laryngoscopic findings in patients with LPRD diagnosed symptomatically and examine the correlation between the RSI & RFS by comparing these two indices. This prospective analytical study was conducted at a tertiary care centre in Bangalore in the Department of ENT for a period of 24 months between Dec 2020 to Dec 2022. The study included patients aged 18 to 60 years diagnosed with LPRD based on symptoms as per RSI score (> 13). RSI & RFS were assessed on diagnosis and patients were followed up for 1, 3 & 6 months for assessment. Total 96 patients were enrolled, with mean age of be 42.49 ± 11.33 years. Prevalence was found to be more in females (61.5%). The most common symptom according to RSI was frequent throat clearing & globus sensation (sensation of something sticking in throat) and most common finding according to RFS was erythema/hyperemia. The mean score of RSI and RFI was found to reduce with treatment at different intervals in follow-up visits. There was a significant strength of association between the RSI and RFS at baseline, 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month of follow-up (r = 0.568, r = 0.684, r = 0.774, r = 0.736 respectively) ( < 0.001).The RFS and RSI showed statistically significant strong relationships between total scores and sign and symptom characteristics. On follow-up, there was a significant reduction in the RSI which was also correlated with a reduction in RFS.

摘要

喉咽反流病(LPRD)是胃内容物逆向流动至喉咽并与上呼吸道消化道组织接触的结果。由于诊断和随访标准不明确,LPRD患者存在诊断不足和治疗不足的情况。反流症状指数(RSI)和反流发现评分(RFS)是两种临床方法,尤其可用于门诊环境。本研究旨在评估有症状诊断的LPRD患者的各种喉镜检查结果,并通过比较这两个指标来检查RSI与RFS之间的相关性。这项前瞻性分析研究于2020年12月至2022年12月期间在班加罗尔的一家三级医疗中心的耳鼻喉科进行,为期24个月。该研究纳入了年龄在18至60岁之间、根据RSI评分(>13)基于症状诊断为LPRD的患者。在诊断时评估RSI和RFS,并对患者进行1、3和6个月的随访以进行评估。共纳入96例患者,平均年龄为42.49±11.33岁。发现女性患病率更高(61.5%)。根据RSI,最常见的症状是频繁清嗓和咽异感症(感觉有东西卡在喉咙里),根据RFS,最常见的发现是红斑/充血。在随访的不同时间间隔,发现RSI和RFI的平均评分随着治疗而降低。在随访的基线、第1个月、第3个月和第6个月,RSI和RFS之间存在显著的关联强度(r分别为0.568、0.684、0.774、0.736)(<0.001)。RFS和RSI在总分与体征和症状特征之间显示出统计学上显著的强关系。在随访中,RSI有显著降低,这也与RFS的降低相关。

相似文献

1
Outpatient Clinical Markers for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Correlational Study.喉咽反流病的门诊临床标志物:一项相关性研究。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Sep;75(3):2042-2048. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03805-2. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
2
Comparison of Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) with Reflux Finding Score (RFS) and Its Effectiveness in Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease (LPRD).反流症状指数(RSI)与反流发现评分(RFS)的比较及其在喉咽反流病(LPRD)诊断中的有效性
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):1809-1813. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01814-z. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
3
Characteristics of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Patients with Chronic Cough Induced by Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.胃食管反流病所致慢性咳嗽患者的喉咽反流特征
Ear Nose Throat J. 2023 Oct 13:1455613231205393. doi: 10.1177/01455613231205393.
4
[A pilot study on diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux disease by pH monitoring in laryngopharynx].[一项通过咽喉pH监测诊断喉咽反流病的初步研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Mar 25;88(12):805-8.
5
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: Outcome of Patients After Treatment in Otolaryngology Clinics.喉咽反流病:耳鼻喉科诊所患者的治疗结果
Cureus. 2020 Dec 21;12(12):e12195. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12195.
6
Screening Test for LPRD: History Versus Video Laryngoscopy.喉咽反流病的筛查测试:病史与视频喉镜检查对比
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Dec;72(4):422-427. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01828-7. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
7
Role of Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score in Diagnosing Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Prospective Study.反流症状指数和反流发现评分在诊断喉咽反流中的作用:一项前瞻性研究。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun;75(2):777-783. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03482-1. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
8
Reflux Finding Score and Reflux Symptom Index Potential Indicators for Diagnosis and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.反流发现评分和反流症状指数:喉咽反流疾病诊断与管理的潜在指标
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Aug;76(4):3239-3244. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04657-0. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
9
Clinical Evaluation of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and its Response to Proton Pump Inhibitors.喉咽反流的临床评估及其对质子泵抑制剂的反应
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun;75(2):409-415. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03219-6. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
10
[The prevalence and relationship between laryngopharyngeal reflux disease, anxiety and depression in otolaryngology outpatients].[耳鼻喉科门诊患者中喉咽反流病、焦虑与抑郁之间的患病率及关系]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 7;55(3):241-248. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2020.03.010.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease in Indian Population.印度人群中喉咽反流病的患病率
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):1877-1881. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01882-1. Epub 2020 May 20.
2
Do laryngoscopic findings reflect the characteristics of reflux in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux?喉镜检查结果是否反映了喉咽反流患者的反流特征?
Clin Otolaryngol. 2018 Feb;43(1):137-143. doi: 10.1111/coa.12914. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
3
Laryngopharyngeal reflux: diagnosis, treatment, and latest research.喉咽反流:诊断、治疗及最新研究
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Apr;18(2):184-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1352504. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
4
Prevalence of laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms: comparison between health checkup examinees and patients with otitis media.咽喉反流症状的流行率:健康体检者与中耳炎患者的比较。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Apr;146(4):562-6. doi: 10.1177/0194599811434049. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
5
Prospective, observational study using rabeprazole in 455 patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.前瞻性、观察性研究,使用雷贝拉唑治疗 455 例咽喉反流病患者。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Jun;268(6):863-9. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1475-9. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
6
Reflux symptom index versus reflux finding score.反流症状指数与反流发现评分
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007 Jun;116(6):436-40. doi: 10.1177/000348940711600608.
7
Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice, and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.喉咽反流:美国耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科学会言语、嗓音和吞咽障碍委员会的立场声明
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Jul;127(1):32-5. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2002.125760.
8
The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS).反流发现评分(RFS)的有效性和可靠性。
Laryngoscope. 2001 Aug;111(8):1313-7. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200108000-00001.