• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

供体的利益与禁止买卖

Kidney donors' interests and the prohibition on sales.

机构信息

Philosophy Department, Bloomsburg University, Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Bioethics. 2023 Nov;37(9):831-837. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13218. Epub 2023 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1111/bioe.13218
PMID:37638703
Abstract

I shall argue, first, that potential kidney donors may be subject to harmful pressure to donate. This pressure may take almost any form; people have diverse interests, and anything that could set them back may qualify as pressure. Given features of the context-the high stakes, the involvement of family, and the social meaning of donation-such pressure may be especially harmful. This problem is less tractable than the more familiar worry that pressure may compromise consent. Screening may ensure donors validly consent, but it provides no protection against harmful pressure. I shall argue, second, that the use of such pressure is the predictable consequence of the prohibition on kidney sales. Potential donors have something-a transplantable kidney-that is both valuable and scarce. Many of them, informed about donation, decide against it. Those in need of a transplant may seek to persuade the unwilling. Given the prohibition, the donation cannot be made more attractive in absolute terms by, say, the addition of money. However, it can be made more attractive in relative terms. If declining the option is made worse, then, by comparison, accepting it is made better. The application of harmful pressure has the desired effect. With so much at stake, and no good alternatives, its use is predictable. I conclude that potential donors' interests should figure more prominently in the discussion of transplant policy. Those who defend the prohibition have made virtually no attempt to account for its impact on that group.

摘要

我将首先论证,潜在的肾脏捐赠者可能会受到捐赠的有害压力。这种压力可能采取任何形式;人们有不同的利益,任何可能使他们倒退的事情都可能构成压力。鉴于背景的特点——高风险、家庭的参与以及捐赠的社会意义——这种压力可能特别有害。这个问题比更熟悉的担忧更难解决,即压力可能会损害同意。筛选可以确保捐赠者有效地同意,但它不能防止有害压力。我将其次论证,这种压力的使用是禁止肾脏销售的可预见后果。潜在的捐赠者拥有有价值且稀缺的东西——可移植的肾脏。他们中的许多人在了解了捐赠后决定不捐赠。那些需要移植的人可能会试图说服不愿意的人。由于禁止销售,不能通过添加金钱等方式使捐赠在绝对意义上更具吸引力。然而,它可以在相对意义上更具吸引力。如果拒绝选择会变得更糟,那么相比之下,接受选择会变得更好。施加有害压力会产生预期的效果。由于利害关系重大,又没有其他好的选择,这种做法是可以预见的。我得出结论,潜在捐赠者的利益应该在移植政策的讨论中更加突出。那些捍卫禁令的人几乎没有试图解释其对该群体的影响。

相似文献

1
Kidney donors' interests and the prohibition on sales.供体的利益与禁止买卖
Bioethics. 2023 Nov;37(9):831-837. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13218. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
2
The prohibition of kidney sales and organ markets should remain.禁止肾脏买卖和器官市场应该继续存在。
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2008 Aug;13(4):386-94. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e3283097476.
3
Assessing elements of informed consent among living donors.评估活体供者知情同意的要素。
Clin Transplant. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(2):185-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01374.x. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
4
Join the Lone Kidney Club: incentivising live organ donation.加入独肾俱乐部:激励活体器官捐献。
J Med Ethics. 2021 Sep;47(9):618-622. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105999. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
5
Availability of transplantable organs from brain stem dead donors in intensive care units.重症监护病房中脑干死亡供体可用于移植的器官情况。
BMJ. 1991 Jan 19;302(6769):149-53. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6769.149.
6
A national program for nondirected kidney donation from living unrelated donors: the Philippine experience.一项针对非血缘关系活体供肾者的全国性计划:菲律宾的经验。
Transplant Proc. 2008 Sep;40(7):2100-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.06.033.
7
A regulated system of incentives for living kidney donation: Clearing the way for an informed assessment.规范活体肾脏捐献激励机制:为知情评估铺平道路。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Nov;22(11):2509-2514. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17129. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
8
The Consequences of Vagueness in Consent to Organ Donation.器官捐赠同意书中模糊性的后果。
Bioethics. 2017 Jul;31(6):424-431. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12335. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
9
Paying for kidneys: the case against prohibition.为肾脏付费:反对禁令的理由。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2002 Mar;12(1):17-45. doi: 10.1353/ken.2002.0004.
10
Interviews of living kidney donors to assess donation-related concerns and information-gathering practices.对活体肾捐献者进行访谈,以评估与捐献相关的关注点和信息收集做法。
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Jun 8;19(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0935-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Ending the organ trade: an ethical assessment of regulatory possibilities.终结器官交易:对监管可能性的伦理评估
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2025 Jun;43(1):150-165. doi: 10.1007/s40592-025-00232-7. Epub 2025 Mar 1.