Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 28;13(8):e075440. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075440.
Flexor tendons are traditionally repaired under either general anaesthesia (GA) or regional anaesthesia (RA), allowing for the use of an arm tourniquet to minimise blood loss and establish a bloodless surgical field. However, the use of tourniquets exposes the patient to certain risks, including skin, muscle and nerve injuries. A recent advancement in anaesthesia delivery involves the use of a wide-awake approach where no sedation nor tourniquets are used (wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT)). WALANT uses local anaesthetic with epinephrine to provide pain relief and vasoconstriction, reducing operative bleeding. Several studies revealed potential benefits for WALANT compared with GA or RA. However, there remains a paucity of high-quality evidence to support the use of WALANT. As a result of this uncertainty, the clinical practice varies considerably. We aim to evaluate the feasibility of WALANT as an alternative to GA and RA in patients undergoing surgical repair of flexor tendon injuries. This involves addressing factors such as clinician and patient support for a trial, clinical equipoise, trial recruitment and dropout and the most relevant outcomes measures for a future definitive trial.
WAFER is a multicentre, single-blinded, parallel group, randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the feasibility of WALANT versus RA and GA. The target population is patients with acute traumatic flexor tendon injuries, across 3 major hand surgery units in England involving a total of 60 participants. Outcome assessors will be blinded. The primary outcome will be the ability to recruit patients into the trial, while secondary outcomes include difference in functional outcome, patient-reported outcome measures, health-related quality of life, cost-effectiveness and complication rates.
Ethical approval was obtained from the London-City and East Research Ethics Committee (22/PR/1197). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conferences, patient information websites and social media networks.
ISRCTN identifier: 15052559.
传统上,屈肌腱修复要么在全身麻醉(GA)下进行,要么在区域麻醉(RA)下进行,使用手臂止血带以最大限度地减少失血并建立无血手术视野。然而,止血带的使用会使患者面临某些风险,包括皮肤、肌肉和神经损伤。麻醉技术的最新进展涉及到使用清醒镇静技术,即不使用镇静剂和止血带(清醒镇静无止血带(WALANT))。WALANT 使用含有肾上腺素的局部麻醉剂来提供止痛和血管收缩,减少手术出血。几项研究表明,与 GA 或 RA 相比,WALANT 具有潜在的优势。然而,目前还缺乏高质量的证据来支持 WALANT 的使用。由于这种不确定性,临床实践差异很大。我们旨在评估 WALANT 作为 GA 和 RA 替代方案在接受屈肌腱损伤手术修复的患者中的可行性。这涉及到解决一些因素,如临床医生和患者对试验的支持、临床平衡、试验招募和脱落以及未来确定性试验的最相关结局测量。
WAFER 是一项多中心、单盲、平行组、随机对照试验(RCT),旨在评估 WALANT 与 RA 和 GA 的可行性。目标人群是患有急性创伤性屈肌腱损伤的患者,涉及英格兰的 3 个主要手部外科单位,共 60 名参与者。结局评估者将被设盲。主要结局将是招募患者进入试验的能力,次要结局包括功能结局、患者报告结局测量、健康相关生活质量、成本效益和并发症发生率的差异。
伦敦市和东伦敦研究伦理委员会已获得伦理批准(22/PR/1197)。研究结果将通过同行评审出版物、会议、患者信息网站和社交媒体网络进行传播。
ISRCTN 标识符:15052559。