Department of Animal Sciences, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.
College of Agriculture, Communities, and the Environment, Kentucky State University, Frankfort, KY 40601.
J Dairy Sci. 2023 Dec;106(12):8611-8626. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22898. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
We evaluated the effects of supplementing bacterial direct-fed microbial (DFM) on performance, apparent total-tract digestibility, rumen fermentation, and immune parameters of lactating dairy cows. One hundred fourteen multiparous Holstein cows (41 ± 7 DIM) were used in a randomized complete block design with an experiment comprising 14 d of a covariate (pre-experimental sample and data collection) and 91 d of an experimental period. Cows were blocked based on energy-corrected milk (ECM) yield during the covariate period and the following treatments were randomly assigned within each block: (1) control (CON), corn silage-based total mixed ration without DFM; (2) PRO-A, basal diet top-dressed with a mixture of Lactobacillus animalis and Propionibacterium freudenreichii at 3 × 10 cfu/d; and 3) PRO-B, basal diet top-dressed with a mixture of L. animalis, P. freudenreichii, Bacillus subtilis, and Bacillus licheniformis at 11.8 × 10 cfu/d. Milk yield, dry matter intake (DMI), and body weight were measured daily, while milk samples for component analysis were taken on 2 consecutive days of each week of data collection. Feces, urine, rumen, and blood samples were taken during the covariate period, wk 4, 7, 10, and 13 for estimation of digestibility, N-partitioning, rumen fermentation, plasma nutrient status and immune parameters. Treatments had no effect on DMI and milk yield. Fat-corrected milk (3.5% FCM) and milk fat yield were improved with PRO-B, while milk fat percent and feed efficiency (ECM/DMI) tended to increase with PRO-B compared with PRO-A and CON. Crude fat digestibility was greater with PRO-B compared with CON. Feeding CON and PRO-A resulted in higher total volatile fatty acid concentration relative to PRO-B. Percentage of neutrophils tended to be reduced with PRO-A compared with CON and PRO-B. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of anti-CD44 antibody on granulocytes tended to be higher in PRO-B compared with CON. The MFI of anti-CD62L antibody on CD8+ T cells was lower in PRO-A than PRO-B, with PRO-A also showing a tendency to be lower than CON. This study indicates the potential of DFM to improve fat digestibility with consequential improvement in fat corrected milk yield, feed efficiency and milk fat yield by lactating dairy cows. The study findings also indicate that dietary supplementation with DFM may augment immune parameters or activation of immune cells, including granulocytes and T cells; however, the overall effects on immune parameters are inconclusive.
我们评估了补充细菌直接饲喂微生物(DFM)对泌乳奶牛生产性能、表观全肠道消化率、瘤胃发酵和免疫参数的影响。采用随机完全区组设计,将 114 头经产荷斯坦奶牛(41±7DIM)分为 14 天的协变量(预实验样本和数据收集)和 91 天的实验期。根据协变量期间的能量校正乳(ECM)产量对奶牛进行分组,然后在每个组内随机分配以下处理:(1)对照组(CON),不含 DFM 的玉米青贮全混合日粮;(2)PRO-A,在基础日粮上添加 3×10cfu/d 的乳杆菌和丙酸杆菌混合物;(3)PRO-B,在基础日粮上添加 11.8×10cfu/d 的枯草芽孢杆菌、地衣芽孢杆菌和乳酸杆菌混合物。每天测量牛奶产量、干物质摄入量(DMI)和体重,同时在数据收集的每两周连续两天采集牛奶样品进行成分分析。在协变量期间、第 4、7、10 和 13 周采集粪便、尿液、瘤胃液和血液样本,以估计消化率、氮分配、瘤胃发酵、血浆营养状况和免疫参数。处理对 DMI 和牛奶产量没有影响。与 PRO-A 和 CON 相比,PRO-B 提高了脂肪校正奶(3.5%FCM)和牛奶脂肪产量,而牛奶脂肪百分率和饲料效率(ECM/DMI)有增加的趋势。与 CON 相比,PRO-B 提高了粗脂肪消化率。与 PRO-B 相比,CON 和 PRO-A 导致总挥发性脂肪酸浓度升高。与 CON 和 PRO-B 相比,PRO-A 导致中性粒细胞百分比降低。与 CON 和 PRO-B 相比,PRO-B 中粒细胞上抗 CD44 抗体的平均荧光强度(MFI)升高。CD8+T 细胞上抗 CD62L 抗体的 MFI 在 PRO-A 中低于 PRO-B,PRO-A 也有低于 CON 的趋势。本研究表明,DFM 有可能通过提高泌乳奶牛的脂肪消化率来提高脂肪校正奶产量、饲料效率和牛奶脂肪产量。研究结果还表明,日粮中添加 DFM 可能会增强免疫参数或免疫细胞(包括粒细胞和 T 细胞)的激活,但对免疫参数的整体影响尚无定论。