Schubert Ann-Kristin, Wiesmann Thomas, Volberg Christian, Riecke Jenny, Schneider Alexander, Wulf Hinnerk, Dinges Hanns-Christian
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Diakoneo Diak Klinikum Schwäbisch-Hall, Schwäbisch-Hall, Germany.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023 Nov;67(10):1414-1422. doi: 10.1111/aas.14318. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
Regional anaesthesia has the benefit of reducing the need for systemic analgesia and therefore, potentially reducing undesired side effects. With the end of the sensory nerve block however, many patients report severe pain that requires therapy with opioids and often compromise the initial opioid sparing effect. This study aimed to characterise the postoperative pain profile and the phenomenon of rebound pain after axillary brachial plexus anaesthesia (RA) compared to general anaesthesia (GA).
Single-centre observational, stratified cohort study.
The study was conducted at University Hospital Marburg from May 2020 until September 2022.
One hundred thirty-two patients receiving elective hand and forearm surgery were enrolled in this study.
Group RA received ultrasound-guided brachial plexus anaesthesia via the axillary approach with 30 mL of prilocaine 1% and 10 mL ropivacaine 0.2%. Group GA received balanced or total intravenous general anaesthesia.
Primary endpoint were integrated pain scores (IPS) within 24 h postoperatively. Secondary endpoints were pain scores (NRS 0-10), morphine equivalents, patient satisfaction, quality of recovery and opioid-related side effects.
One hundred thirty-two patients were analysed of which 66 patients received brachial plexus block and 66 patients received general anaesthesia. Following RA significantly lower IPS were seen directly after surgery (p < .001) and during the post-anaesthesia care unit interval (p < .001) but equalised after 3 h at the ward. No overshoot in pain scores or increased opioid consumption could be detected. Patient satisfaction and postoperative recovery were comparable between both groups.
The IPS and NRS was initially lower in the RA group, increased with fading of the block until equal to the GA group and equal thereafter. Although various definitions of rebound pain were met during this phase, the opioid sparing effect of regional anaesthesia was not counteracted by it. The incidence of episodes with uncontrolled, severe pain did not differ between groups. We found no clinical implications of rebound pain in this setting, since the RA group did not show higher pain scores than the GA group at any time point.
German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00021764).
区域麻醉有助于减少全身镇痛的需求,因此有可能减少不良副作用。然而,随着感觉神经阻滞的结束,许多患者报告出现严重疼痛,需要使用阿片类药物进行治疗,这常常会削弱最初的阿片类药物节省效应。本研究旨在描述与全身麻醉(GA)相比,腋路臂丛神经麻醉(RA)后的术后疼痛特征和反弹痛现象。
单中心观察性分层队列研究。
该研究于2020年5月至2022年9月在马尔堡大学医院进行。
132例接受择期手部和前臂手术的患者纳入本研究。
RA组通过腋路接受超声引导下臂丛神经麻醉,使用30毫升1%的丙胺卡因和10毫升0.2%的罗哌卡因。GA组接受平衡或全静脉全身麻醉。
主要终点是术后24小时内的综合疼痛评分(IPS)。次要终点是疼痛评分(数字评分量表0 - 10)、吗啡当量、患者满意度、恢复质量和阿片类药物相关副作用。
分析了132例患者,其中66例接受臂丛神经阻滞,66例接受全身麻醉。RA组术后直接(p <.001)和在麻醉后护理单元期间(p <.001)的IPS显著较低,但在病房3小时后趋于相等。未检测到疼痛评分过度升高或阿片类药物消耗量增加。两组患者的满意度和术后恢复情况相当。
RA组的IPS和数字评分量表最初较低,随着阻滞消退而升高,直至与GA组相等,此后保持相等。尽管在此阶段符合反弹痛的各种定义,但区域麻醉的阿片类药物节省效应并未被其抵消。两组中未控制的严重疼痛发作的发生率没有差异。我们发现在这种情况下反弹痛没有临床意义,因为RA组在任何时间点的疼痛评分均未高于GA组。
德国临床试验注册中心(DRKS00021764)。