Suppr超能文献

当反应标准被删失时,对两个治疗组进行比较的三种序贯方法的模拟研究。

A simulation study of three sequential methods for the comparison of two treatment groups when the response criterion is censored.

作者信息

Benichou J, Chastang C

出版信息

Stat Med. 1986 Jul-Aug;5(4):375-85. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780050410.

Abstract

Three recent sequential methods, group sequential analysis (GSA), the sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) and the triangular test (TT) are well suited to randomized clinical trials with a censored response criterion, as they do not require matched pairs of patients. We undertook a simulation study to investigate their statistical properties and to compare these three methods with the fixed-sample design. Our results suggest that the three methods have the expected statistical properties for size and power; they allow an important reduction of the average number of events before stopping, except with GSA when there is no treatment difference; the triangular test (closed design) appears the optimal design, as the variance of the number of events is smaller than with the sequential probability ratio test (open design) and analysis after every twenty new events does not alter the statistical properties of these sequential methods and enhances their usefulness.

摘要

最近的三种序贯方法,即成组序贯分析(GSA)、序贯概率比检验(SPRT)和三角检验(TT),非常适合具有删失反应标准的随机临床试验,因为它们不需要患者配对。我们进行了一项模拟研究,以调查它们的统计特性,并将这三种方法与固定样本设计进行比较。我们的结果表明,这三种方法在检验水准和检验效能方面具有预期的统计特性;它们能够显著减少停止试验前的平均事件数,但在无治疗差异时的成组序贯分析除外;三角检验(封闭式设计)似乎是最佳设计,因为事件数的方差小于序贯概率比检验(开放式设计),并且每20个新事件后进行分析不会改变这些序贯方法的统计特性,还能提高其有用性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验