Benichou J, Chastang C
Stat Med. 1986 Jul-Aug;5(4):375-85. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780050410.
Three recent sequential methods, group sequential analysis (GSA), the sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) and the triangular test (TT) are well suited to randomized clinical trials with a censored response criterion, as they do not require matched pairs of patients. We undertook a simulation study to investigate their statistical properties and to compare these three methods with the fixed-sample design. Our results suggest that the three methods have the expected statistical properties for size and power; they allow an important reduction of the average number of events before stopping, except with GSA when there is no treatment difference; the triangular test (closed design) appears the optimal design, as the variance of the number of events is smaller than with the sequential probability ratio test (open design) and analysis after every twenty new events does not alter the statistical properties of these sequential methods and enhances their usefulness.
最近的三种序贯方法,即成组序贯分析(GSA)、序贯概率比检验(SPRT)和三角检验(TT),非常适合具有删失反应标准的随机临床试验,因为它们不需要患者配对。我们进行了一项模拟研究,以调查它们的统计特性,并将这三种方法与固定样本设计进行比较。我们的结果表明,这三种方法在检验水准和检验效能方面具有预期的统计特性;它们能够显著减少停止试验前的平均事件数,但在无治疗差异时的成组序贯分析除外;三角检验(封闭式设计)似乎是最佳设计,因为事件数的方差小于序贯概率比检验(开放式设计),并且每20个新事件后进行分析不会改变这些序贯方法的统计特性,还能提高其有用性。