Centre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Bahia, Brazil.
Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.
Ethn Health. 2024 Jan;29(1):46-61. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2023.2245183. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
There is limited evidence regarding the impact of race/racism and its intersection with socioeconomic status (SES) on breast and cervical cancer, the two most common female cancers globally. We investigated racial inequalities in breast and cervical cancer mortality and whether SES (education and household conditions) interacted with race/ethnicity.
The 100 Million Brazilian Cohort data were linked to the Brazilian Mortality Database, 2004-2015 (n = 20,665,005 adult women). We analysed the association between self-reported race/ethnicity (White/'Parda'(Brown)/Black/Asian/Indigenous) and cancer mortality using Poisson regression, adjusting for age, calendar year, education, household conditions and area of residence. Additive and multiplicative interactions were assessed.
Cervical cancer mortality rates were higher among Indigenous (adjusted Mortality rate ratio = 1.80, 95%CI 1.39-2.33), Asian (1.63, 1.20-2.22), 'Parda'(Brown) (1.27, 1.21-1.33) and Black (1.18, 1.09-1.28) women vs White women. Breast cancer mortality rates were higher among Black (1.10, 1.04-1.17) vs White women. Racial inequalities in cervical cancer mortality were larger among women of poor household conditions, and low education (P for multiplicative interaction <0.001, and 0.02, respectively). Compared to White women living in completely adequate (3-4) household conditions, the risk of cervical cancer mortality in Black women with 3-4, 1-2, and none adequate conditions was 1.10 (1.01-1.21), 1.48 (1.28-1.71), and 2.03 (1.56-2.63), respectively (Relative excess risk due to interaction-RERI = 0.78, 0.18-1.38). Among 'Parda'(Brown) women the risk was 1.18 (1.11-1.25), 1.68 (1.56-1.81), and 1.84 (1.63-2.08), respectively (RERI = 0.52, 0.16-0.87). Compared to high-educated White women, the risk in high-, middle- and low-educated Black women was 1.14 (0.83-1.55), 1.93 (1.57-2.38) and 2.75 (2.33-3.25), respectively (RERI = 0.36, -0.05-0.77). Among 'Parda'(Brown) women the risk was 1.09 (0.91-1.31), 1.99 (1.70-2.33) and 3.03 (2.61-3.52), respectively (RERI = 0.68, 0.48-0.88). No interactions were found for breast cancer.
Low SES magnified racial inequalities in cervical cancer mortality. The intersection between race/ethnicity, SES and gender needs to be addressed to reduce racial health inequalities.
关于种族/种族主义及其与社会经济地位(SES)的交叉对全球两种最常见的女性癌症——乳腺癌和宫颈癌的影响,证据有限。我们调查了乳腺癌和宫颈癌死亡率的种族不平等现象,以及 SES(教育和家庭状况)是否与种族/族裔相互作用。
1000 万巴西队列数据与巴西死亡率数据库(2004-2015 年,n=20665005 名成年女性)相关联。我们使用泊松回归分析了自我报告的种族/族裔(白人/“棕色人种”/黑人/亚洲人/土著人)与癌症死亡率之间的关联,调整了年龄、日历年份、教育、家庭状况和居住地。评估了加性和乘法相互作用。
与白人女性相比,土著(调整后的死亡率比=1.80,95%CI 1.39-2.33)、亚洲(1.63,1.20-2.22)、“棕色人种”(1.27,1.21-1.33)和黑人(1.18,1.09-1.28)女性的宫颈癌死亡率更高。与白人女性相比,黑人(1.10,1.04-1.17)的乳腺癌死亡率更高。在家庭条件较差和教育程度较低的女性中,宫颈癌死亡率的种族不平等现象更大(P 交互作用<0.001 和 0.02)。与生活在完全适当(3-4)家庭条件下的白人女性相比,3-4、1-2 和无适当条件的黑人女性宫颈癌死亡率的风险分别为 1.10(1.01-1.21)、1.48(1.28-1.71)和 2.03(1.56-2.63)(交互作用引起的相对超额风险-RERI=0.78,0.18-1.38)。在“棕色人种”女性中,风险分别为 1.18(1.11-1.25)、1.68(1.56-1.81)和 1.84(1.63-2.08)(RERI=0.52,0.16-0.87)。与高学历白人女性相比,高、中、低学历黑人女性的风险分别为 1.14(0.83-1.55)、1.93(1.57-2.38)和 2.75(2.33-3.25)(RERI=0.36,-0.05-0.77)。在“棕色人种”女性中,风险分别为 1.09(0.91-1.31)、1.99(1.70-2.33)和 3.03(2.61-3.52)(RERI=0.68,0.48-0.88)。未发现乳腺癌的相互作用。
低 SES 放大了宫颈癌死亡率的种族不平等现象。需要解决种族/族裔、SES 和性别之间的交叉问题,以减少种族健康不平等。