• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口腔公共卫生决策中的小型公众参与。

Mini-publics in dental public health policymaking.

机构信息

Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, UK.

出版信息

Community Dent Health. 2023 Nov 30;40(4):248-251. doi: 10.1922/CDH_00077Lowery04.

DOI:10.1922/CDH_00077Lowery04
PMID:37642353
Abstract

What are mini-publics and under what circumstances could they be applied to public health dentistry? This question is explored with reference to water fluoridation in England, a policy intervention characterised by a visceral politics that has embedded a systemic preference for non-decision-making. Mini-publics can nevertheless inform decision-making by inviting a representative sample of the affected citizenry to consider the available evidence and come to a set of conclusions and/or recommendations that if all parties cannot agree, none can reasonably object. In doing so, mini-publics have the potential to break the policy deadlock by adding an additional layer of legitimacy to the decision-making process, albeit this is dependent upon decision-makers granting value to their findings.

摘要

迷你公投是什么,在什么情况下可以将其应用于公共卫生牙科?本文参考英格兰的水氟化政策干预措施,探讨了这一问题。该政策干预措施的特点是政治上存在强烈的分歧,系统地倾向于不做决策。然而,迷你公投可以通过邀请受影响公民的代表性样本来考虑现有证据,并得出一系列结论和/或建议,从而为决策提供信息,如果各方无法达成一致,那么任何人都不能合理地反对。这样,迷你公投有可能通过为决策过程增加额外的合法性,打破政策僵局,尽管这取决于决策者是否重视他们的发现。

相似文献

1
Mini-publics in dental public health policymaking.口腔公共卫生决策中的小型公众参与。
Community Dent Health. 2023 Nov 30;40(4):248-251. doi: 10.1922/CDH_00077Lowery04.
2
Politics at a distance: Infrastructuring knowledge flows for democratic innovation.远程政治:为民主创新构建知识流。
Soc Stud Sci. 2022 Feb;52(1):106-126. doi: 10.1177/03063127211033990. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
3
Health technology adoption and the politics of governance in the UK.英国的健康技术采用与治理政治
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Dec;63(12):3102-12. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.009. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
4
Science, Politics, and Communication: The Case of Community Water Fluoridation in the US.科学、政治与传播:美国社区水氟化的案例。
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Jun;28(6):401-410. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 29.
5
Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research.哪些公众以及为何是刻意选择的?——对公共卫生与卫生政策研究中公众参与审议的范围界定审查
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;131:114-21. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
6
How much do the general public want to be involved in decisions on implementing water fluoridation?普通民众希望在实施水氟化决策中参与到什么程度?
Br Dent J. 2000 May 13;188(9):500-2. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800521.
7
Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes.关于审议方法的思考:公众参与过程的设计与评估问题
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Jul;57(2):239-51. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00343-x.
8
Community Water Fluoridation: Caveats to Implement Justice in Public Oral Health.社区饮水氟化:公共口腔健康实施正义的警示。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;18(5):2372. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052372.
9
Stock options, tax credits or employment contracts please! The value of deliberative public disagreement about human tissue donation.股票期权、税收抵免或就业合同!关于人体组织捐赠的审议性公众分歧的价值。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(2):209-16. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
10
Challenges to the adoption of community water fluoridation.社区水氟化的采用面临的挑战。
Fam Community Health. 1980 Nov;3(3):33-40. doi: 10.1097/00003727-198011000-00004.