Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
BMC Res Notes. 2023 Aug 29;16(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06453-5.
Researchers sought patient feedback on a proposed randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which gynecological cancer patients would modify their diets with intermittent fasting to gain insight into patients' perspectives, receptivity, and potential obstacles. A convenience sample of 47 patients who met the inclusion criteria of the proposed RCT provided their feedback on the feasibility and protocols of the RCT using a multi-method approach consisting of focus groups (n = 8 patients) and surveys (n = 36 patients).
Patients were generally receptive to the concept of intermittent fasting, and many expressed an interest in attempting it themselves. Patients agreed that the study design was feasible in terms of study assessments, clinic visits, and biospecimen collection. Feedback on what could facilitate adherence included convenient appointment scheduling times and the availability of the research team to answer questions. Regarding recruitment, patients offered suggestions for study advertisements, with the majority concurring that a medical professional approaching them would increase their likelihood of participation.
研究人员寻求患者对一项拟议的随机对照试验(RCT)的反馈,该试验将使妇科癌症患者通过间歇性禁食来改变饮食,以深入了解患者的观点、接受程度和潜在障碍。采用包括焦点小组(n=8 名患者)和调查(n=36 名患者)在内的多方法方法,对符合拟议 RCT 纳入标准的 47 名患者进行了反馈,评估了 RCT 的可行性和方案。
患者普遍接受间歇性禁食的概念,许多人表示有兴趣自己尝试。患者认为从研究评估、就诊和生物样本采集的角度来看,该研究设计是可行的。关于如何促进坚持的反馈包括方便的预约时间和研究团队能够回答问题。在招募方面,患者对研究广告提出了建议,大多数人认为专业医生与他们接触会增加他们参与的可能性。