Sadeghpour Marvi Houman, Baloochi Beydokhti Tahereh, Sajjadi Moosa, Khaleghimanesh Behruz
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.
Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Apr 17;13(2):e126384. doi: 10.5812/aapm-126384. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Hemodialysis patients suffer from pain caused by needle insertion into the fistula site. Non-pharmacological methods may be associated with acceptable effects.
The present study aimed to compare the effects of two interventions on pain intensity during needle insertion into the arteriovenous fistula in hemodialysis patients.
This self-controlled, single-blind clinical trial was conducted on 54 hemodialysis subjects with arteriovenous fistula in Mashhad in 2021. In this regard, the patients were selected according to the inclusion criteria and randomly assigned to two groups (lidocaine spray and rhythmic breathing). In each group, pain intensity was assessed based on the visual analogue scale (VAS) before the intervention, followed by measuring the post-intervention pain intensity during three consecutive hemodialysis sessions every other day. Regarding the lidocaine spray group, two puffs of 10% lidocaine spray (20 mg) were sprayed on the needle insertion site five minutes before cannulation. However, the patients in another group took a long deep breath through the nose with three numbers, held their breath in the lungs for three numbers, and slowly exhaled through the mouth with three numbers two minutes before cannulation. The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 20, and Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, chi-squared, and paired -tests were run. In this study, P < 0.05 was considered significant.
The results represented a significant decrease in the pain severity scores of both rhythmic breathing (P = 0.023) and lidocaine spray (P < 0.001) groups after the intervention. Moreover, a more significant difference was observed between pre-and post-intervention pain intensity scores in the group treated with lidocaine spray (1.16 ± 1.56) compared to the other group (0.508 ± 1.25).
The lidocaine spray group had a larger difference in the pre-and post-intervention pain intensity scores than the rhythmic group; however, the difference was not significant. The rhythmic breathing can be used by nurses as a non-pharmacological method with low complications in hemodialysis departments because of declining pain.
血液透析患者会遭受因将针头插入动静脉内瘘部位而引起的疼痛。非药物方法可能具有可接受的效果。
本研究旨在比较两种干预措施对血液透析患者动静脉内瘘穿刺时疼痛强度的影响。
2021年在马什哈德对54例有动静脉内瘘的血液透析受试者进行了这项自身对照、单盲临床试验。在这方面,根据纳入标准选择患者并随机分为两组(利多卡因喷雾组和节律性呼吸组)。在每组中,在干预前根据视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛强度,然后在每隔一天的连续三次血液透析治疗期间测量干预后的疼痛强度。对于利多卡因喷雾组,在插管前五分钟将两喷10%利多卡因喷雾(20毫克)喷在穿刺部位。然而,另一组患者在插管前两分钟通过鼻子深吸气数三个数,在肺部屏住呼吸数三个数,然后通过嘴巴缓慢呼气数三个数。使用SPSS 20版软件对数据进行分析,并进行曼-惠特尼U检验、威尔科克森检验、卡方检验和配对检验。在本研究中,P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
结果显示,干预后节律性呼吸组(P = 0.023)和利多卡因喷雾组(P<0.001)的疼痛严重程度评分均显著降低。此外,与另一组(0.508±1.25)相比,利多卡因喷雾治疗组干预前后疼痛强度评分的差异更显著(1.16±1.56)。
利多卡因喷雾组干预前后疼痛强度评分的差异比节律性呼吸组大;然而,差异不显著。由于疼痛减轻,节律性呼吸可被护士用作血液透析科室并发症少的非药物方法。