Kuşman Adnan, Kır Yağmur, Baskak Nilay Sedes, Akaslan Damla Sayar, Yalçınkaya Büşra, Cengiz Eylem Gökçe, Çakmak Işık Batuhan, Altınoklu Müge Ulusoy, Artar Müge, Baskak Bora
Bulanık State Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Muş, Turkey.
Bursa Acıbadem Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Bursa, Turkey.
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2023 Aug 13;60(3):214-222. doi: 10.29399/npa.28199. eCollection 2023.
Attachment style has been associated with socio-emotional outcomes, however little evidence suggests a possible association with executive functioning. Few studies have demonstrated that attachment style mediates working memory and learning relationships. We hypothesized that attachment style affects performance and cortical activity patterns of working memory.
We compared working memory performance and cortical activity in securely and insecurely attached first-year college students (N=49) using three n-back task conditions. Cortical activity was recorded by functional near-infrared spectroscopy during these three conditions of the n-back task. Attachment style was assessed using the Relationship Scale Questionnaire, categorized into four groups.
Both study groups showed similar working memory performance. The cortical representation of working memory was different between the two groups. The securely attached group demonstrated higher activity in the right superior frontal and superior-medial frontal areas across all n-back conditions as well as in the right superior frontal cortex during the two-back and three-back conditions. The insecurely attached group displayed higher activity in the bilateral supplementary motor area and the left premotor area only during the three-back condition.
These findings emphasize the potential influence of attachment style on the cortical representation of working memory. Different activity maps between the two groups may reflect varying cognitive strategies employed to achieve a comparable working memory performance. Moreover, these results suggest that each style may have a distinct strategy to achieve attachment-relevant and irrelevant neurocognitive tasks.
依恋风格已与社会情感结果相关联,然而,几乎没有证据表明其与执行功能可能存在关联。很少有研究表明依恋风格会介导工作记忆与学习之间的关系。我们假设依恋风格会影响工作记忆的表现及皮层活动模式。
我们使用三种n-back任务条件,比较了安全型和不安全型依恋的大一学生(N = 49)的工作记忆表现和皮层活动。在n-back任务的这三种条件下,通过功能近红外光谱记录皮层活动。使用关系量表问卷评估依恋风格,并将其分为四组。
两个研究组的工作记忆表现相似。两组之间工作记忆的皮层表征不同。在所有n-back条件下,安全型依恋组在右侧额上回和额中内侧回区域以及在二-back和三-back条件下的右侧额上回皮层表现出更高的活动。不安全型依恋组仅在三-back条件下在双侧辅助运动区和左侧运动前区表现出更高的活动。
这些发现强调了依恋风格对工作记忆皮层表征的潜在影响。两组之间不同的活动图谱可能反映了为实现可比的工作记忆表现而采用的不同认知策略。此外,这些结果表明每种风格可能都有独特的策略来完成与依恋相关和不相关的神经认知任务。