Suppr超能文献

有待占据的数字领地:国家与网络空间国有化

A digital territory to be appropriated: the state and the nationalization of cyberspace.

作者信息

Koulos Thanos

机构信息

Public Administration and Sociology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, South Holland, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Open Res Eur. 2022 Mar 28;1:119. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14010.2. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Next to land, water, air and space, cyberspace is the complex socio-technical setting often called the 'fifth domain'. Nationalism has taken over the organization of the first four domains, in the form of constructing national states, national territorial waters and national airspace. The basic proposition of this article is that the ideology of nationalism has also infiltrated the fifth domain - cyberspace - in two ways. First, through state-led cyber-nationalism via official government websites that present 'national' achievements and propagate the official state positions on disputes about territory, symbols or history. Second, through individual communities who use the internet to sustain a sense of national belonging and/or to promote and disseminate their nationalist ideals. Both ways are important in an online national identity (re)production framework that, in a fluid, global, modern world, functions supportively towards the traditional national identity (re)production mechanisms. This article aims to examine the patterns of the nationalization of cyberspace through an analysis of state-led institutions and government websites that aim to enhance national identity and the sense of national belonging in a globalized world, as well as to propagate official state positions. It will focus on Greek, Dutch, US and Israeli websites. The term 'nationalization' in this context denotes the ideological charging of the cyber-footprint of the nation: how the internet produces and re-produces the nation, how the users partake in the national community by way of 'consuming' the digitalized national ideology, and the way cyber-nationalism defines people's sense of belonging.

摘要

除了陆地、水域、空气和太空,网络空间是一个复杂的社会技术环境,常被称为“第五领域”。民族主义已经以构建民族国家、国家领海和国家领空的形式主导了前四个领域的组织。本文的基本观点是,民族主义意识形态也通过两种方式渗透到了第五领域——网络空间。第一,通过官方政府网站主导的网络民族主义,这些网站展示“国家”成就,并宣传官方对领土、象征或历史争端的立场。第二,通过个人群体,他们利用互联网来维系民族归属感和/或宣扬和传播他们的民族主义理想。在一个流动、全球化的现代世界中,这两种方式在在线民族身份(再)生产框架中都很重要,该框架对传统民族身份(再)生产机制起到了支持作用。本文旨在通过分析旨在增强民族身份和在全球化世界中的民族归属感以及宣传官方国家立场的国家主导机构和政府网站,来研究网络空间的国有化模式。它将聚焦于希腊、荷兰、美国和以色列的网站。在这种背景下,“国有化”一词指的是国家网络印记的意识形态灌输:互联网如何产生和再生产国家,用户如何通过“消费”数字化的民族意识形态来参与民族共同体,以及网络民族主义如何界定人们的归属感。

相似文献

1
A digital territory to be appropriated: the state and the nationalization of cyberspace.
Open Res Eur. 2022 Mar 28;1:119. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14010.2. eCollection 2021.
2
Lala activists in dark times: queer feminist resistance to the cyber-nationalist attacks in China.
J Lesbian Stud. 2024;28(3):460-485. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2023.2281060. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
3
A Discourse Analysis of Quotidian Expressions of Nationalism during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Chinese Cyberspace.
J Chin Polit Sci. 2021;26(2):277-293. doi: 10.1007/s11366-020-09692-6. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
4
Reflexive Green Nationalism (RGN): A sociological antidote to the climate crisis?
Front Sociol. 2022 Oct 14;7:1021641. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.1021641. eCollection 2022.
5
Apriori Algorithm for the Data Mining of Global Cyberspace Security Issues for Human Participatory Based on Association Rules.
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 9;11:582480. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582480. eCollection 2020.
6
Multiculturalism and interculturalism: redefining nationhood and solidarity.
Comp Migr Stud. 2018;6(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40878-018-0082-6. Epub 2018 May 17.
7
Constructing the understanding of teenagers deviant use of cyberspace.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;67(8):1068-1071. doi: 10.1177/0020764020975791. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
8
Authoritarianism and National Identity: Examining the Longitudinal Effects of SDO and RWA on Nationalism and Patriotism.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Aug;43(8):1086-1099. doi: 10.1177/0146167217704196. Epub 2017 May 6.
9
Is Nationalism Rising in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic? Individual-Level Evidence from the United States.
J Chin Polit Sci. 2021;26(1):169-187. doi: 10.1007/s11366-020-09696-2. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验