Su Ruolin, Shen Wensong
School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Xin Jian Building, 1954 Huashan Road, Shanghai, 200030 China.
Department of Sociology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
J Chin Polit Sci. 2021;26(1):169-187. doi: 10.1007/s11366-020-09696-2. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
Following the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, analysts have noted a global rise of nationalism as countries have engaged in a number of nationalist moves in response to the pandemic. However, the implication of policy changes at the individual-level remains unclear: do citizens support those nationalist government responses? More importantly, do people tend to be more nationalistic following the outbreak? Building on terror management theory (TMT), this article examines whether and how ideological beliefs affect individuals' support for nationalist policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. According to TMT, to cope with death anxiety, people are predisposed to ideological defense, resulting in cohesion with individuals who validate their beliefs and hostility toward those who threaten them. Thus, we argue that when states' nationalist policies are aligned with their ideology, people tend to support them; yet, when states' nationalist policies contradict their ideology, people tend to withdraw their support. Specifically, this study found that as non-conservatives (compared to conservatives) are more concerned with the virus, they are more likely to show an inclination of ideological validation. Given that their ideology advocates more tolerance, non-conservatives are less likely to support nationalistic policies. To test the hypotheses, we applied structural equation modeling to a March 2020 CNN Poll (nationally representative US data about COVID-19). The statistical analysis demonstrated strong support for our arguments.
在新冠疫情出现后,分析人士指出,随着各国针对疫情采取了一系列民族主义举措,全球民族主义情绪有所抬头。然而,政策变化在个体层面的影响仍不明确:公民是否支持那些民族主义的政府应对措施?更重要的是,疫情爆发后人们是否会变得更加民族主义?基于恐怖管理理论(TMT),本文探讨了在新冠疫情期间,意识形态信念是否以及如何影响个人对民族主义政策的支持。根据恐怖管理理论,为了应对死亡焦虑,人们倾向于进行意识形态防御,从而与认同自己信念的人凝聚在一起,并对威胁他们的人产生敌意。因此,我们认为,当国家的民族主义政策与他们的意识形态一致时,人们倾向于支持这些政策;然而,当国家的民族主义政策与他们的意识形态相矛盾时,人们则倾向于撤回支持。具体而言,本研究发现,与保守派相比,非保守派更担心病毒,因此他们更有可能表现出意识形态认同的倾向。鉴于他们的意识形态主张更多的宽容,非保守派不太可能支持民族主义政策。为了检验这些假设,我们对2020年3月的一项美国有线电视新闻网民意调查(关于新冠疫情的具有全国代表性的美国数据)应用了结构方程模型。统计分析有力地支持了我们的观点。